Effectiveness of Delirium Care Protocol After Cardiac Surgery
Effectiveness of Postoperative Delirium Prevention, Diagnosis and Intervention Protocol on Patients Monitored in the Intensive Care Unit After Cardiac Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Center
-
Antalya, Center, Turkey, 07000
- Antalya Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteering to participate in the study,
- Being 18 years or older,
- Ability to speak and communicate in Turkish,
- Having undergone cardiac surgery and being on the first postoperative day,
- Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 and above,
- Having a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 and above,
- Not having a serious psychiatric or neurological diagnosis,
- No serious visual or auditory problems
Exclusion Criteria:
- Undergoing surgeries other than cardiac surgery (such as abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair, thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, deep vein thrombosis, peripheral artery disease, carotid endarterectomy),
- Previous cardiac surgery,
- Postponing or canceling the surgery,
- No preoperative admission to the cardiovascular surgery service and no emergency surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control group (standard clinical care)
Control group receiving standard care administered by doctors and nurses for delirium management in the intensive care unit
|
|
|
Experimental: Intervention group (care with protocol)
The intervention group received care in line with the postoperative delirium prevention, diagnosis and intervention protocol after the delirium training given by the researcher to intensive care unit nurses.
|
The intervention group received care in line with the postoperative delirium prevention, diagnosis and intervention protocol after the delirium training given by the researcher to intensive care unit nurses.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Confusion Assessment Scale in the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Time Frame: Three weeks
|
With the application of CAM-ICU, an evaluation is made as "there is delirium" or "there is no delirium".
CAM-ICU; It consists of four items including sudden change of consciousness or fluctuation in the patient's level of consciousness, attention assessment, and evaluation of thought organization and level of consciousness.
According to this scale, in order for patients to be diagnosed with delirium, the first and second items and one of the third or fourth items must result in favor of delirium.
|
Three weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Time Frame: Three weeks
|
It is used to evaluate the patients' state of consciousness.
With a scale consisting of three parts: eye opening, motor and verbal response, the patients' response to stimuli in these three areas is evaluated and scored.
It is evaluated between three and fifteen points, with fifteen points indicating full consciousness and three points indicating deep coma.
In order for CAM-ICU to be applied to patients, the GCS score must be eight or above.
If the GCS score is eight or below, the patient is considered to be in a coma and cannot be evaluated.
|
Three weeks
|
|
Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)
Time Frame: Three weeks
|
Before starting the delirium evaluation, the state of consciousness (alertness) is first evaluated.
RASS takes values between "(+4)" and "(-5)".
While the ideal level where the patient is alert and calm is scored as "0" on the scale, positive RASS scores "(+1,+2,+3,+4)" indicate an agitated patient; Negative RASS scores "(-1,-2,-3,-4,-5)" indicate patients who are sedated or in a coma.
|
Three weeks
|
|
Information Assessment Form for Postoperative Delirium (Pretest-Posttest)
Time Frame: One week
|
The knowledge assessment form for postoperative delirium (Pretest-Posttest) was developed by researchers by scanning the literature in order to measure the knowledge levels of nurses working in intensive care units before and after training on postoperative delirium.
For each item in the form consisting of 30 questions, answers were received from the participants as "True", "False" and "I don't know".
"1" point was given for each "True" statement, and "0" point was given for each "False" and "I don't know" statements.
The highest score that can be obtained from the test is "30".
The form, consisting of items regarding the definition of delirium, risk factors, symptoms, prevention, diagnosis and intervention of delirium, was applied by the researcher to all nurses who attended the training before and after the training.
|
One week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gonul Kara Soylemez, MD, Mustafa Kemal University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, Speroff T, Gautam S, Bernard GR, Inouye SK. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.
- Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A, Radtke F, Riese F, Slooter AJ, Veyckemans F, Kramer S, Neuner B, Weiss B, Spies CD. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):192-214. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594. Erratum In: Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Sep;35(9):718-719.
- Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
- Allen SR, Frankel HL. Postoperative complications: delirium. Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Apr;92(2):409-31, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.01.012.
- Hshieh TT, Inouye SK, Oh ES. Delirium in the Elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 May;36(2):183-199. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.11.001.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MustafaKU-SBF-GKS-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.