Biomechanical Investigation of Symptomatic FAI and Two Groups of Asymptomatic Controls (CAM-FAI adult)
An Integrated Biomechanical Investigation of Subjects With Symptomatic FAI and Two Groups of Asymptomatic Controls: a Comparison in Dynamic Tasks
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an orthopaedic condition that is primarily characterized by the presence of anatomic bony abnormalities in the femoral head and/or the acetabulum resulting in an abnormal contact between the two during hip motion, especially in positions of increased hip flexion and rotation, ultimately leading to hip pain. Unfortunately, a FAI diagnosis is frequently only made once symptoms have become severe to an extent that they limit everyday life activities. Moreover, another important aspect that has been consistently overlooked in past FAI movement studies is the influence muscle strength and activation can have on movement pattern and symptom presentation. The diagnosis and management of FAI needs to be addressed through a more wholesome investigation of the biomechanical influence on the manifestation of symptoms.
This project aims to further unravel the link between spinopelvic anatomy, its biomechanical contribution to femoro-pelvic motion and the manifestation of femoroacetabular impingement in adult male population. By, for the first time, integrating three-dimensional (3D) instrumented motion analysis with state-of-the-art full-body biplanar X-ray imaging (EOS imaging, Paris France), we will more specifically investigate the presence of an association between spinopelvic kinematics and the link to symptomatic FAI morphology, as well as investigate the presence of differences in these measures between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with comparable femoral morphology.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an orthopaedic condition that is primarily characterized by the presence of anatomic bony abnormalities in the femoral head and/or the acetabulum resulting in an abnormal contact between the two during hip motion, especially in positions of increased hip flexion and rotation, ultimately leading to hip pain. FAI can be radiologically classified into 3 types of morphology: Pincer, CAM and mixed type. While a clear-cut radiological classification makes the identification of FAI seem quite straightforward, it fails to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Unfortunately, a FAI diagnosis is frequently only made once symptoms have become severe to an extent that they limit everyday life activities. Not only this movement restriction is a significantly debilitating factor in such a young active population, a recent study reported FAI patients to see on average 4.0 health care providers, undergo on average 3.4 diagnostic imaging tests, and receive on average 3.1 treatments prior to final diagnosis. This raises the cost of an individual FAI diagnosis to be €1,563.26 higher than the calculated minimum required cost. Such calculations clearly reveal the long-lasting, multifactorial burden of FAI on society.
Moreover, another important aspect that has been consistently overlooked in past FAI movement studies is the influence muscle strength and activation can have on movement pattern and symptom presentation. To our knowledge only three studies have looked into muscle strength by using mainly hand-held dynamometers to record the isometric strength of hip musculature. Their findings suggest hip muscle weakness in symptomatic FAI subjects, but whether this weakness is a pain protective consequence, or an actual cause of FAI is still unknown.
In conclusion, the diagnosis and management of FAI needs to be addressed through a more wholesome investigation of the biomechanical influence on the manifestation of symptoms.
This project aims to further unravel the link between spinopelvic anatomy, its biomechanical contribution to femoro-pelvic motion and the manifestation of femoroacetabular impingement in adult male population. By, for the first time, integrating three-dimensional (3D) instrumented motion analysis with state-of-the-art full-body biplanar X-ray imaging (EOS imaging, Paris France), we will more specifically investigate the presence of an association between spinopelvic kinematics and the link to symptomatic FAI morphology, as well as investigate the presence of differences in these measures between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with comparable femoral morphology.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Stijn Ghijselings, MD
- Phone Number: +32 16 33 88 18
- Email: stijn.ghijselings@uzleuven.be
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Orthopedic Research
- Phone Number: +32 16 33 88 18
- Email: orthopedie.research@uzleuven.be
Study Locations
-
-
Vlaams-Brabant
-
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
- Recruiting
- University Hospitals of Leuven
-
Contact:
- Stijn Ghijselings, MD
- Phone Number: +32 16 33 88 18
- Email: stijn.ghijselings@uzleuven.be
-
Contact:
- Orthopedic Research
- Phone Number: +32 16 33 88 18
- Email: orthopedie.research@uzleuven.be
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants in all three study groups will be excluded if x-ray scans shows a pincer FAI morphology or radiological sign of osteoarthritis.
Inclusion Criteria:
- All participants will be males aged between 21 and 35 years old.
For symptomatic CAM-FAI patients
- The presence of CAM-FAI morphology at the head-neck junction of the femur
- Alpha angle >60
- Reduced hip internal rotation (IR<15)
For asymptomatic CAM controls:
1. Exhibit asymptomatic CAM on x-ray scansAlpha angle >60
For Healthy control group:
- Exhibit no symptoms or abnormal morphologies of the proximal femur (Alpha angle >60 , IR>15).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Symptomatic CAM-FAI patients
33 patients that exhibit symptomatic CAM-FAI on medical imaging (Alpha angle >60) and have reduced hip internal rotation (IR<15).
All participants in this group will be males aged between 21 and 35 years old.
|
Every subject in this study will undergo a radiographic analysis of the hip and spine using a low-dose, full-body biplanar X-ray acquisition (in standing, sitting and squatting position, EOS imaging).
A hip-specific 3D motion analysis will be performed. The 3D motion protocol will be divided into 2 main sections. First section: Consist of movements categorized within the activities of daily living (walking at self-selected speed, uphill walking, standardized deep squat and non-standardized deep squat) Second section: Consists of movements that are categorized within athletic training and have been specifically chosen to induce large hip ranges of motion (Sumo squats, dead lifts, forward lunges, running uphill and downhill) Each movements will be repeated 6 times. Three times with the dominant foot/opposite leg on the force plate to collect kinetic data. All data will be captured using two 10-15 camera 3D motion capture systems and one capturing an instrumented treadmill (M-gait) |
|
Experimental: Asymptomatic CAM-FAI patients
33 healthy control that exhibit asymptomatic CAM on x-ray scans (Alpha angle >60).
All participants in this group will be males aged between 21 and 35 years old.
|
Every subject in this study will undergo a radiographic analysis of the hip and spine using a low-dose, full-body biplanar X-ray acquisition (in standing, sitting and squatting position, EOS imaging).
A hip-specific 3D motion analysis will be performed. The 3D motion protocol will be divided into 2 main sections. First section: Consist of movements categorized within the activities of daily living (walking at self-selected speed, uphill walking, standardized deep squat and non-standardized deep squat) Second section: Consists of movements that are categorized within athletic training and have been specifically chosen to induce large hip ranges of motion (Sumo squats, dead lifts, forward lunges, running uphill and downhill) Each movements will be repeated 6 times. Three times with the dominant foot/opposite leg on the force plate to collect kinetic data. All data will be captured using two 10-15 camera 3D motion capture systems and one capturing an instrumented treadmill (M-gait) |
|
Experimental: Healthy controls
33 healthy control that exhibit no symptoms or abnormal morphologies of the proximal femur (Alpha angle >60 , IR>15).
All participants in this group will be males aged between 21 and 35 years old.
|
Every subject in this study will undergo a radiographic analysis of the hip and spine using a low-dose, full-body biplanar X-ray acquisition (in standing, sitting and squatting position, EOS imaging).
A hip-specific 3D motion analysis will be performed. The 3D motion protocol will be divided into 2 main sections. First section: Consist of movements categorized within the activities of daily living (walking at self-selected speed, uphill walking, standardized deep squat and non-standardized deep squat) Second section: Consists of movements that are categorized within athletic training and have been specifically chosen to induce large hip ranges of motion (Sumo squats, dead lifts, forward lunges, running uphill and downhill) Each movements will be repeated 6 times. Three times with the dominant foot/opposite leg on the force plate to collect kinetic data. All data will be captured using two 10-15 camera 3D motion capture systems and one capturing an instrumented treadmill (M-gait) |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The presence of CAM morphology in combination with symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
|
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Consists of six separate subscales assessing Pain, Symptoms, Physical function in daily living, Physical function in Sport and Recreation, Participation in Physical Activities and hip and/or groin-related Quality of Life (QOL).
|
Baseline
|
|
Radiographic spinopelvic parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Radiographic spinopelvic parameters will be collected via a radiographic analysis of the hip and spine using a low-dose, full-body biplanar X-ray acquisition (in standing, sitting and squatting position) as well as a classic x-ray image in 45° Dunn view of both hips.
|
Baseline
|
|
3D motion analysis parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
|
3D motion analysis parameters will be collected via a hipspecific 3D motion analysis where different movements will be performed on the force plate.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stijn Ghijselings, MD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- S66441
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Femoroacetabular Impingement
-
NCT00605969CompletedFemoroacetabular, Impingement
-
NCT02368483CompletedSymptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement
-
NCT00606047CompletedFemoroacetabular Hip Impingement Syndrome
-
NCT07271277Not yet recruitingFemoroacetabular Impingement
-
NCT07422662Not yet recruitingFemoroAcetabular Impingement
-
NCT06420180Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07322705Not yet recruitingFemoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
-
NCT07285876CompletedFemoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
-
NCT05031390CompletedFemoroacetabular Impingement
Clinical Trials on EOS
-
NCT05441332CompletedPatellofemoral Pain Syndrome
-
NCT05921721Not yet recruitingHip Dysplasia | Femoroacetabular Impingement
-
NCT05224908CompletedPregnancy Related | EOS | Fetus Fetus | Breech Fetal Presentation
-
NCT03076658RecruitingIntervertebral Disc Degeneration | Osteoarthritis, Spine
-
NCT03397459UnknownLordosis | Cervicobrachial Neuralgia
-
NCT04513691CompletedMaternal; Chorioamnionitis, Affecting Fetus | Early-Onset Sepses, Neonatal
-
NCT04895891Recruiting