Exercise Capacity Improvement by Conduction System Pacing in heArt Failure patieNts Without Compelling CRT inDication (ESCPAND)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Heart failure (HF) is a serious condition that affects a lot of people and places a significant burden on the healthcare system. Some HF patients also have issues with the natural electrical system of their heart, causing uneven heart contractions and worsening heart function. A treatment known as CRT has been helping such patients, but it does not work for everyone. A new technique called conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged that might offer a more natural way of maintaining heart contractions.
This study aims to determine if CSP can enhance the ability of HF patients to exercise, by looking at their maximum oxygen consumption (a measure of exercise capacity). It will also explore why some HF patients struggle with exercise more than others. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the new CSP treatment or a standard pacing method (right ventricular apical pacing). Patients will be checked regularly over a follow-up period of 24 weeks.
The main goal is to see if patients can exercise better with CSP after 24 weeks. The study will also look at other heart measures and safety concerns related to the devices. This study might show that CSP can help improve exercise capacity and heart function in certain HF patients. The results could guide health care professionals in offering better, tailored treatments for their patients.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Andreas Gevaert
- Phone Number: 038213538
- Email: Andreas.gevaert@uza.be
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Faro Verelst
- Phone Number: 038213538
- Email: faro.verelst@uza.be
Study Locations
-
-
Antwerp
-
Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
- Recruiting
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
-
Contact:
- Faro Verelst
- Phone Number: 038213538
- Email: faro.verelst@uza.be
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with heart failure as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
- Signs and/or symptoms of heart failure
- AND LVEF <50% OR LVEF ≥50% and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities consistent with the presence of LV diastolic dysfunction/raised filling pressures
- AND indication for cardiac pacing as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years old
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide consent or to undergo follow-up
- Class 1A indication for classical CRT as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Patients with a class 2A or higher indication for CRT can be included. However, patients with Class 1A indication for classical CRT but failure or suboptimal result of CS lead placement can be included.
- Significant cardiac or extracardiac comorbidity precluding maximal exercise testing, examples: Recent (<4 weeks) decompensation of heart failure, angina pectoris class ≥2 , uncontrolled hypertension or arrhythmia , severe valvular heart disease, significant peripheral vascular disease, orthopaedic limitation ...
- Comorbidity that may influence 6-month prognosis, examples:
Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR ≤20 mL/kg/min or dialysis) , severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (≥GOLD 3) , active malignancy ...
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Conduction system pacing
In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing.
|
In the conduction system pacing group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in a septal position to achieve conduction system pacing, either His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing.
In the usual care group, the right ventricular lead will be placed in the right ventricle apex as usual.
|
|
Active Comparator: Right ventricular apical pacing
Control group, in this group patients will receive a pacemaker with the ventricular lead in the right ventricle apex.
|
This is the usual care group.
Patients will receive a pacemaker device with the right ventricular lead inserted in the apex and not in the septal position.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Change of VO2 peak from baseline to 24 weeks
|
24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: 4 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Change of VO2 peak from baseline to 4 weeks
|
4 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
|
Echocardiographic parameters (Ejection Fraction)
Time Frame: 4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Change from baseline to 4,12 and 24 weeks (EF%)
|
4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
|
QRS width
Time Frame: 4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Change from baseline to 4,12,24 weeks (msec)
|
4, 12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
|
Biomarker, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels
Time Frame: 4 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Change from baseline to 4, 24 weeks (pg/ml)
|
4 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
|
Health-related quality of life scores
Time Frame: 4,12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
KCCQS - Kansas City cardiomyopathy quality score
|
4,12 and 24 weeks after pacemaker implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andreas Gevaert, University Hospital, Antwerp
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.