First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Endoluminal Robotic System for En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Chi Fai Ng, MD
- Phone Number: 35052625
- Email: ngcf@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sha Tin, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- Prince of Wales Hospital
-
Contact:
- Chi Fai NG, MD
- Phone Number: 3505 2625
- Email: ngcf@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 75 years
- Body mass index <35 kg/m2
- Bladder tumour located <3 cm in size; clinically non-muscle invasive bladder tumour
- Clinically indicated for en-bloc resection.
- Willingness to participate as demonstrated by giving informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of endoscopic or imaging signs of detrusor muscle invasion
- Contraindication to general anaesthesia / spinal anaesthesia
- ASA > 2 patients
- Severe concomitant illness that drastically shortens life expectancy or increases risk of therapeutic intervention
- Untreated active infection
- Un-corrected coagulopathy
- Presence of another malignancy or distant metastasis
- Emergency surgery
- Vulnerable population (e.g. mentally disabled, pregnant)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment arm
Patients underwent En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours using Agilis Robotic System.
|
Patients underwent En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours using Agilis Robotic System.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful en-bloc tumour resection by the robotic system
Time Frame: During the operation
|
The number of cases completed the intervention by robotic system
|
During the operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dissection time and speed
Time Frame: During operation
|
Time required for submucosal dissection from the first cut
|
During operation
|
|
Total procedure time
Time Frame: During operation
|
Time from insertion of the robotic system into urethra until removal of the specimen from the body
|
During operation
|
|
Surgeon Console time
Time Frame: During operation
|
From the time start of any procedure to completion of urethral catheter insertion
|
During operation
|
|
Presence of detrusor muscle in specimen
Time Frame: During operation
|
Presence of detrusor muscle in specimen
|
During operation
|
|
Resection Margin
Time Frame: During operation
|
Number of subject with Negative resection margin
|
During operation
|
|
Intra-operative bladder perforation event
Time Frame: During operation
|
Number of subject
|
During operation
|
|
Need of bladder irrigation
Time Frame: Within 30 days after the study intervention.
|
Number of subject
|
Within 30 days after the study intervention.
|
|
Residual tumour or upstaging of tumour after second look TURBT
Time Frame: Within 30 days after the study intervention.
|
Number of subject
|
Within 30 days after the study intervention.
|
|
Post-operative complications
Time Frame: Within 90 days after the study intervention
|
Complication is defined according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification
|
Within 90 days after the study intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chi Fai NG, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ukai R, Kawashita E, Ikeda H. A new technique for transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumor in 1 piece. J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):878-9.
- McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ. 2013 Jun 18;346:f3012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3012.
- Cheng YY, Sun Y, Li J, Liang L, Zou TJ, Qu WX, Jiang YZ, Ren W, Du C, Du SK, Zhao WC. Transurethral endoscopic submucosal en bloc dissection for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: A comparison study of HybridKnife-assisted versus conventional dissection technique. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(7):1606-1612. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_786_17.
- McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J; Balliol Collaboration; Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.
- Maurice MJ, Vricella GJ, MacLennan G, Buehner P, Ponsky LE. Endoscopic snare resection of bladder tumors: evaluation of an alternative technique for bladder tumor resection. J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):614-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0587. Epub 2012 May 3.
- Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F, Joniau S, Vander Eeckt K, Serretta V, Larre S, Di Stasi S, Van Rhijn B, Witjes AJ, Grotenhuis AJ, Kiemeney LA, Colombo R, Briganti A, Babjuk M, Malmstrom PU, Oderda M, Irani J, Malats N, Baniel J, Mano R, Cai T, Cha EK, Ardelt P, Varkarakis J, Bartoletti R, Spahn M, Johansson R, Frea B, Soukup V, Xylinas E, Dalbagni G, Karnes RJ, Shariat SF, Palou J. Prognostic factors and risk groups in T1G3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients initially treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin: results of a retrospective multicenter study of 2451 patients. Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.040. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
- Paciotti M, Casale P, Colombo P, Fasulo V, Saita A, Lughezzani G, Contieri R, Buffi NM, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Hurle R. Long-term Follow-up After En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results from a Single-center Experience. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Feb 24;26:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.015. eCollection 2021 Apr.
- Zhang KY, Xing JC, Li W, Wu Z, Chen B, Bai DY. A novel transurethral resection technique for superficial bladder tumor: retrograde en bloc resection. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul 6;15(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1192-6.
- Teoh JY, MacLennan S, Chan VW, Miki J, Lee HY, Chiong E, Lee LS, Wei Y, Yuan Y, Yu CP, Chow WK, Poon DM, Chan R, Lai F, Ng CF, Breda A, Kramer MW, Malavaud B, Mostafid H, Herrmann T, Babjuk M. An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):546-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. Epub 2020 May 8.
- Hurle R, Lazzeri M, Colombo P, Buffi N, Morenghi E, Peschechera R, Castaldo L, Pasini L, Casale P, Seveso M, Zandegiacomo S, Taverna G, Benetti A, Lughezzani G, Fiorini G, Guazzoni G. "En Bloc" Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Single-center Study. Urology. 2016 Apr;90:126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
- Teoh JY, Mayor N, Li KM, Lo KL, Ng CF, Mostafid H. En-bloc resection of bladder tumour as primary treatment for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: routine implementation in a multi-centre setting. World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3353-3358. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03675-9. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
- Bilbro NA, Hirst A, Paez A, Vasey B, Pufulete M, Sedrakyan A, McCulloch P; IDEAL Collaboration Reporting Guidelines Working Group. The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines: A Delphi Consensus Statement Stage Specific Recommendations for Reporting the Evaluation of Surgical Innovation. Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):82-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004180.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRE2023.589-T
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.