Multicentre Interventional Pilot Study on the Evaluation of the Functionality, Safety and Reliability of a New Robotic Prosthesis for the Lower Limb at the Transfemoral Level (MOTU-ATP)
The goal of this multicenter interventional pilot is to verify the functionality of a prosthesis for trans-femoral amputees.
The main question it aims to answer are:
- Is to verify the technical functionality, safety and reliability of the propulsive lower limb prosthesis prototype, with active ankle, so as to provide indications regarding the technical and functional developments to be implemented in the finalization of the device.
- Provide an indication of the functional effectiveness of the device and its satisfaction by patients.
Participants will perform:
- walking tests inside parallel bars on flat and/or inclined terrain;
- walking tests on treadmill;
- stair climbing/descent tests.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
FI
-
Firenze, FI, Italy, 50143
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- trans femoural amputation
- Medicare Functional Classification Levels k3-k4
- expert prosthesis wearer (more than one year)
- electronic knee prostheses user
- energy-release prosthetic foot user
Exclusion Criteria:
- Relevant medical comorbidities
- heart device wearers (PMK or AICD)
- cognitive impairment
- anxious or depressed illness
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: prosthetic group
prosthetic group performs the entire protocol with the prosthesis prototype.
|
evaluation of functionality, degree of safety and reliability of the lower limb prosthesis prototype
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ad hoc check-list Adverse Event
Time Frame: baseline
|
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
|
baseline
|
|
ad hoc check-list Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 2
|
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
|
day 2
|
|
ad hoc check-list Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 3
|
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
|
day 3
|
|
ad hoc check-list Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 4
|
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
|
day 4
|
|
ad hoc check-list Adverse Event
Time Frame: day 5
|
questionnaire that evaluate the device feasibility of the prosthesis and description of any adverse events.
|
day 5
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gailey R, Allen K, Castles J, Kucharik J, Roeder M. Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(1):15-29. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.11.0147.
- Mak AF, Zhang M, Boone DA. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Mar-Apr;38(2):161-74.
- Pirouzi G, Abu Osman NA, Eshraghi A, Ali S, Gholizadeh H, Wan Abas WA. Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:849073. doi: 10.1155/2014/849073. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
- Segal AD, Orendurff MS, Klute GK, McDowell ML, Pecoraro JA, Shofer J, Czerniecki JM. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;43(7):857-70. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.09.0147.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MOTU ATP - Studio clinico
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.