A One-year Trajectory of Depression Status Changes in Older Adults With MCI and SD: a Longitudinal Cohort Study

November 25, 2024 updated by: Dan Ting Chen, Fujian Medical University

A One-year Trajectory of Depression Status Changes in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Subthreshold Depression: a Longitudinal Cohort Study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the one-year trajectory of changes in depression status in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and subthreshold depression, and to explore relevant risk factors for predicting changes in depression status. This one-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study involved 400 (expected) subjects who met the diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment combined with subthreshold depression in older adults, and their depressive status was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Follow up monitoring of depression status at 6 and 12 months. Obtain factors related to changes in depressive status (such as age, gender, education level, cognitive function, anxiety level, sleep status, social support, psychological resilience, social network, etc.). By studying the longitudinal trajectory of depression status in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment and subthreshold depression, a multi state Markov model with time and state discreteness is constructed, namely: State 1 (normal); State 2 (subthreshold depression); State 3 (mild depression); State 4 (moderate depression); State 5 (severe depression). Deeply explore and analyze the impact of certain factors and indicators on the transition between states, and estimate the probability of transition between states.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
466

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350000
        • Fujian Provincial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Select elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment and subthreshold depression who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria from multiple elderly care institutions, a tertiary hospital in Fuzhou, and communities in Fujian Province as the research subjects.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: ≥ 60 years old
  2. Meets the diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment and subthreshold depression
  3. Having basic comprehension and verbal expression skills
  4. Voluntarily participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed as depression patients, including patients with organic mental disorders and patients with a history of depression related mental disorders
  2. Cognitive impairment caused by other diseases (such as neurological and psychiatric disorders, metabolic disorders, poisoning, infections, etc.)
  3. Severe heart, liver, and kidney diseases
  4. Serious chronic diseases and complications, such as congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes and other diseases with serious complications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive state
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) is used to investigate the psychological feelings of patients in the past week. Result evaluation criteria: The total score range is 0-15 points, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. 1-5 points are subthreshold depression, 6-7 points are mild depression, 8-11 points are moderate depression, and 12-15 points are severe depression.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General information of patients
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Using a self-made general information scale, such as age, gender, education level, and other basic personal information
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Cognitive
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an assessment tool used for rapid screening of mild cognitive impairment. The total score is 30 points, and the higher the score, the better the cognitive function of the research subject. Literacy group ≤ 13 points, primary school group ≤ 19 points, and middle school and above group ≤ 24 points can be judged as cognitive impairment.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Activity of Daily Living
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale adopts a Liket four level rating. The evaluation results can be analyzed based on total score, dimension score, and individual score. A total score of 20 is considered completely normal, while a score above 20 indicates varying degrees of functional decline. A score of 1 for each item indicates normal functionality, while a score of 2-4 indicates decreased functionality.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Anxiety
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) has a total of 20 items, of which 5, 9, 13, 17, and 19 items are scored in reverse. The scale adopts a 1-4 level scoring method (1 point for no or very little time; 2 points for a small portion of time; 3 points for a considerable amount of time; 4 points for the vast majority or all of time). Individuals fill in the scale based on their own situation in the most recent week, multiply the calculated total score by 1.25, take an integer as the standard score, and use it as a statistical indicator. The higher the standard score, the more severe the anxiety level of the individual.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Social Function
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) includes three dimensions: objective support, subjective support, and support utilization, with a total of 10 items: 1 point (none) to 4 points (full support). The higher the score in each dimension, the more support received.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Social Function
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6) is used to measure the structural characteristics of individual family and friend networks, as well as the supporting functions played by the network, in order to reflect the social network level of the respondents. It consists of two parts: the home network and the friend network, each with three items, totaling six items. Each entry has 5 options, with a score of 0-5 points and a total score of 0-30 points. The higher the score, the higher the level of social network, and<12 points indicates insufficient social network.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) has a total of 19 items, divided into 7 components: subjective sleep quality, time to fall asleep, sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, hypnotic drugs, and daytime function. The higher the total score, the worse the sleep quality.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1
Resilience
Time Frame: 2023.6.1-2024.7.1
The Corner Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRISC) consists of 10 items and uses the Likert 5-point scoring system. A score of 0-4 indicates "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "often", and "always", with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological resilience.
2023.6.1-2024.7.1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fujian Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: DanTing Chen, Fujian Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • K2022-03-074

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings