Traditional In-Person Vs. Remote AR Clinical Simulation (AR Brazil)
Remote Augmented Reality Versus Traditional In-person Resuscitation Assessment: an International Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94304
- Lucile Parkard Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Brazilian resident
Exclusion Criteria:
- a history of severe motion sickness
- currently have nausea
- a history of seizures
- wear corrective glasses.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental: Augmented Reality Enhanced Simulation (Treatment group)
Participants will experience augmented simulations with a holographic mixed-reality setting based on different workplace scenarios such as medical crisis via Augmented Reality (AR) headset.
|
Augmented simulation of medical crisis scenarios
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional In Situ Simulation (Control group)
Participants will experience in-person simulations of different workplace scenarios such as medical error and workplace harassment
|
In Person simulation of medical crisis scenarios
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance
Time Frame: immediately after simulation
|
Measured with Instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance.
The instrument consists of 26 items, which are rated on a scale from +2 to -2.
A total assessment score of performance is given based on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) at the end of the instrument.
|
immediately after simulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of the AR system's usability
Time Frame: immediately after simulation
|
Measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS).
The scale has 10 items.
Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)
|
immediately after simulation
|
|
Evaluation of the AR system's ergonomics
Time Frame: immediately after simulation
|
Measured with the ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors.
The scale has 6 items.
Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)
|
immediately after simulation
|
|
Reassessment of Non Technical Skill (NTS) with Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
Time Frame: immediately after simulation
|
Measured with individual Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS).
The BARS scoring system uses four categories assessing situation awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork.
The score ranges from 1 and 9 (1 = poor and 9 = excellent)
|
immediately after simulation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 74626
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.