Comparison of the Efficacy of Telerehabilitation and In-person Rehabilitation Based on Wearable Devices After ACLR Surgery: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Purpose: Investigate whether telerehabilitation based on wearable devices is clinically as effective as in-person rehabilitation for ACLR patients.
Subjects: 164 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent ACLR. Design: A mixed-block randomization method was used to randomly assign participants to two groups: the telerehabilitation group and the in-person rehabilitation group, with a 50% probability of assignment to each group. All participants received standard postoperative rehabilitation training with identical content. The telerehabilitation group received postoperative telerehabilitation guidance via software and sensors. The in-person rehabilitation group received therapist-administered treatment with three rehabilitation sessions per week. All participants underwent regular follow-ups (1 day preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively).
Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the Lysholm score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Scale, SF-36 questionnaire, VAS score, and isokinetic muscle strength of the knee joint.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Purpose: Investigate whether telerehabilitation based on wearable devices is clinically as effective as in-person rehabilitation for ACLR patients.
Subjects: Participants: This study recruited 164 participants (aged ≥18 years) undergoing ACLRsurgery;
Inclusion criteria:
(1) Age range 18-60 years; (2) First-time unilateral ACLR surgery or ACLR combined with meniscus resection surgery; (3) No other lower limb joint injuries at the same time; (4) Possession of an internet-connected mobile device capable of using a mobile application; (5) Alert and oriented, with no communication impairments; Exclusion Criteria: (1) Patients undergoing revision surgery; (2) Patients who have previously undergone other lower limb surgeries; (3) Patients scheduled for another lower limb surgery within the next 6 months; (4) Patients with concomitant knee ligament injuries or severe structural damage beyond meniscal tears; (5) Patients with other comorbidities that may interfere with rehabilitation exercises; (6) Patients undergoing acute-phase surgery; (7)Patients undergoing acute surgery.
Protocol: Participants were randomly assigned to two groups using a mixed-block randomization method: the telerehabilitation group and the in-person rehabilitation group. The allocation probability for both groups was 50%. All participants received routine outpatient diagnosis and treatment. Postoperative rehabilitation training used a standardized postoperative rehabilitation training protocol with identical content. The telerehabilitation group received postoperative telerehabilitation guidance via software and sensors. The in-person rehabilitation group received three face-to-face rehabilitation sessions per week. All participants underwent regular follow-ups (1 day preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively).
Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the Lysholm score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Scale, SF-36 questionnaire, VAS score, isokinetic muscle strength of the knee joint, and muscle strength symmetry.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: quan J Wang, M.D.
- Phone Number: 13801076267
- Email: wjqsportsmed@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
- quan Jian Wang
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
(1) Age range 18-60 years; (2) First-time unilateral ACLR surgery or ACLR combined with meniscus resection surgery; (3) No other lower limb joint injuries at the same time; (4) Possession of an internet-connected mobile device capable of using a mobile application; (5) Alert and oriented, with no communication impairments;
Exclusion Criteria:
(1) Patients undergoing revision surgery; (2) Patients who have previously undergone other lower limb surgeries; (3) Patients scheduled for another lower limb surgery within the next 6 months; (4) Patients with concomitant knee ligament injuries or severe structural damage beyond meniscal tears; (5) Patients with other comorbidities that may interfere with rehabilitation exercises; (6) Patients undergoing acute-phase surgery; (7)Patients undergoing acute surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: in-person rehabilitation group
The in-person rehabilitation group takes a face-to-face approach, with therapists providing outpatient rehabilitation instruction twice a week for six weeks.
|
The in-person rehabilitation group uses a face-to-face approach, with therapists providing outpatient rehabilitation guidance to patients three times a week for six weeks.
After that, patients exercise at home according to the rehabilitation manual.
|
|
Experimental: telerehabilitation group
The telerehabilitation group uses software and sensors to provide remote postoperative rehabilitation guidance.
|
The telerehabilitation group uses smart wearables and mobile apps worn around the knee joint to perform telerehabilitation at home.
Both sets of training sessions are identical.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lysholm score
Time Frame: From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
Used to assess knee joint function, with a score range of 0-100, where a higher score indicates better knee joint function.
|
From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
IKDC score
Time Frame: From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
Used to assess knee joint function, with a score range of 0-100.
The higher the score, the better the knee joint function.
|
From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
|
Tegner score
Time Frame: From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
Used to assess motor function.
The range is 0-10, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
|
From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
|
VAS score
Time Frame: From before ACLR surgery to 6 months after surgery.
|
Used to assess pain levels.
The range is 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher pain levels.
|
From before ACLR surgery to 6 months after surgery.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey(SF-36)
Time Frame: From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
Used to assess quality of life.
There are 9 subscales, each with a score range of 0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.
|
From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
|
|
Peak torque and symmetry of knee flexors and extensors
Time Frame: From before ACLR surgery to 6 months after surgery.
|
Used to assess knee muscle strength
|
From before ACLR surgery to 6 months after surgery.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale
Time Frame: six months after ACL reconstruction
|
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury Scale
|
six months after ACL reconstruction
|
|
VAS pain score
Time Frame: six months after ACL reconstruction
|
VAS pain score
|
six months after ACL reconstruction
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: quan J Wang, M.D., Peking University Third Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- M2023132
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.