Postoperative Pain After Breast Surgery Under Tumescent Local Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia ( TLA-001 )

January 23, 2026 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Prospective Unicentre Non-randomised Study: Comparison of Postoperative Pain After Breast Cancer-typical Surgery Under Tumescent Local Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia - TLA 001

The present study aims to investigate the impact of Tumescent Local Anesthesia (TLA) on pain perception following surgeries typical for breast cancer. Previous research has already confirmed the feasibility of conducting operations in TLA for benign breast conditions. In contrast to general anesthesia, Tumescent Local Anesthesia involves local anesthesia of the surgical site, allowing patients to remain awake during the procedure and eliminating the risks associated with general anesthesia. Additionally, if needed, sedatives or further anesthesia can be administered through the vein. Building upon the successful applications of TLA in benign breast surgeries, this follow-up study at the Department of Women's Health focuses on enhancing surgical techniques, pain management, and postoperative care for breast cancer-related procedures. Simultaneously, our goal is to gather scientific data regarding the application of this technique. This research contributes to the continuous advancement of medical practices in the field of breast surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
349

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • University Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population comprises patients presenting with invasive breast carcinoma or pure ductal carcinoma in situ with an indication for surgical treatment at the Department of Women's Health in Tübingen.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Histologically confirmed breast carcinoma or pure ductal carcinoma in situ
  • Planned operation:
  • Segmental resection/ breast-conserving surgery
  • Segmental resection/ breast-conserving surgery with SNB
  • Ablatio
  • Ablatio with SNB/ axilla exploration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expected lack of patient compliance or inability of the patient to understand the purpose of the study
  • Lack of patient consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Complete axillary dissection
  • Tumour-adapted reduction surgery, implant reconstructions
  • Surgeries where technical difficulties are expected under any anaesthesia (e.g. ASA IV, BMI > 40)
  • Bilateral breast operations
  • Men

Exclusion Criteria for surgery in TLA:

  • Injection phobia
  • Psychoses/ previous psychological illnesses
  • Advanced dementia
  • Language barrier

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Control Group
Surgery carried out according to clinical routine under general anaesthesia.
Procedure: General Anaesthesia
Breast surgery is carried out under general anesthesia.
Local Anaesthesia Group
Surgery carried out under local tumescent anaesthesia. Procedure
Procedure: Local tumescent anaesthesia
Breast surgery is carried out under local tumescent anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 5 weeks

The primary endpoint is the recording of postoperative pain. Pain will be measured on 1.-3. postoperative day using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be').

Additionally, the postoperative pain will be assessed using the VAS at the post-operative follow-up consultation, which usually takes place 2-5 weeks after surgery.
5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HRQoL/ Quality of life
Time Frame: 5 weeks
The outcome measure for Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in this study utilizes the Breast-Q questionnaire specific to breast cancer (BCT/Mastectomy). Preoperative assessments are conducted during the recruitment phase following participants' consent, providing baseline HRQoL data. Postoperative evaluations occur 2-5 weeks after the surgery during follow-up discussions, capturing changes in HRQoL in the immediate aftermath of the mastectomy and informing the study about the impact of the surgical intervention on participants' quality of life.
5 weeks
Postoperative pain medication requirements
Time Frame: 5 weeks

The outcome measure for postoperative pain medication requirements includes the assessment of administered pain medications, encompassing anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and non-opioid analgesics.

Patient's medical records will be examined to identify the pain medications administered postoperatively. The administered pain medications will then be categorized into anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and non-opioid analgesics. The total dosage of each type of pain medication administered will be calculated until hospital dischanrge. To evaluate the effectiveness of the administered pain medications in managing postoperative pain, pain assessment tool (Visual Analog Scale) will be used to measure pain intensity (2-3x daily for exercise and rest). On the first postoperative day, patients also receive the standardized QUIPS pain questionnaire consisting of 16 questions pain assesement after operation.
5 weeks
Complications
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Complications in the study will be recorded during the hospital stay and post-operative follow-up, using the Clavien- Dindo classification system to categorize and assess their severity, contributing vital insights into the safety and efficacy of the surgical intervention.
5 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 day until 2 weeks
The "length of hospital stay" refers to the time elapsed from a patient's admission to their discharge.
1 day until 2 weeks
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: 1 until 5 hours
In the current clinical study, the duration of surgery, measured as the time from incision to wound closure, will be meticulously recorded using precise timekeeping instruments. This involves capturing the elapsed time from the moment the surgical incision is made to the point when the wound is closed.
1 until 5 hours
Drainage delivery rate
Time Frame: Surgery until discharge (1 day until 2 weeks )
The drainage delivery rate will be assessed by measuring the volume of fluid collected by the drainage system until the point of discharge. This involves tracking the total volume in milliliters (ml) accumulated over the entire duration of drainage until the patient is discharged.
Surgery until discharge (1 day until 2 weeks )
Follow-up surgery for R1 situation
Time Frame: 5 hours
An additional outcome criterion is whether there is a R1 situation with subsequent surgery, answered yes/no.
5 hours
Preoperative fear of surgery and anaesthesia
Time Frame: 30 Minutes
The secondary outcome criterion, "preoperative fear of surgery and anesthesia," will be assessed using the APAIS (Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale) questionnaire and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. The APAIS questionnaire consists of multiple items measuring anxiety and information desire related to surgery and anesthesia, with higher scores indicating greater preoperative fear. The Visual Analog Scale, ranging from 0 (no fear) to 10 (extreme fear), allows participants to subjectively rate their apprehension, providing a numerical representation of the intensity of preoperative fear.
30 Minutes
Costs
Time Frame: 5 weeks
The costs of breast surgery conducted under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia serve as a crucial outcome criterion in the clinical study. This assessment involves comparing the overall expenses associated with each anesthesia method, including anesthesia administration, recovery, and potential complications, to determine the economic implications and cost-effectiveness of the two approaches in the context of breast surgery.
5 weeks
Satisfaction of the surgeon with the course of the operation
Time Frame: 5 hours
The satisfaction of the surgeon with the course of the operation will be measured on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 represents not satisfied at all and 10 signifies extreme satisfaction.
5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Tuebingen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bettina Böer, Dr., University Hospital Tübingen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SenoEx_TLA_Maligne

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings