Accuracy of Two Methods of Making Impressions for Complete-arch Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis
A Randomized Controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effectiveness of Two Methods of Taking Impressions for an Implant-supported Fixed Prostheses With One-piece Titanium Frameworks in Edentulous Jaws
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-70 years old (including 18 and 70 years old);
- The patient's maxilla or mandible cannot be preserved due to missing teeth or remaining teeth proposed for implant-retained restoration;
- The patient's missing teeth area is available for placement of 4-6 implants;
- Completion of osseointegration of the patient's implants after implant surgery;
- The patient has at least 2 mm width of keratinized mucosa in the remaining alveolar ridge;
- The patient voluntarily participates in the trial and signs an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient has a severe gag reflex;
- The patient has an intermaxillary distance of less than 20 mm in the posterior region;
- The distance between the two implants is less than 10 mm;
- Implants fitted with composite abutments with the abutment screw holes penetrating at an angle greater than 60 degrees to the alveolar ridge;
- Other patients judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for inclusion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: digital impression
intraoral scan
|
intraoral scanning of the edentulous arch and scan body
|
|
Active Comparator: conventional impression
open tray
|
conventional method of impression making with silicone rubber material
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Grade of framework passive fit
Time Frame: during the deliver of the framework
|
The passive fit of the titanium framework is measured with a scoring system.
Five aspects are evaluated.
whether to pry; Single Screw Probing misfit; All Screws; Probing misfit; Smooth during screwing; X-ray for misfit.
For each aspect, 0/1 is scored.
the total score is between 0 and 5.
|
during the deliver of the framework
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SH9H-2024-T29-2
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.