Expanding Access to Care Through Telemedical Support for Vital Sign Monitoring in High-risk Patients With Cancer
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Wendi Mitchell
- Phone Number: 269-373-7443
- Email: research@wmcc.org
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49007
- West Michigan Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant is a male or female 18 years of age or older.
- Participant is a current patient at West Michigan Cancer Center/Bronson Cancer Center.
- Participant is receiving bevacizumab as part of active treatment.
- Participant is willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participant is unable to understand English.
- Participant is hospitalized.
- Participants are unable to obtain blood pressure readings at home.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
Standard of care
|
Cellular enabled blood pressure cuff vs. standard blood pressure cuff
|
|
Active Comparator: Smart Cuff Group
Smart blood pressure cuff
|
Cellular enabled blood pressure cuff vs. standard blood pressure cuff
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To determine whether remote blood pressure monitoring improves adherence to recommendations for daily systolic and diastolic blood pressure monitoring compared to usual care
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
|
Comparing the number of participants who complete the recommended daily blood pressure readings available for clinician assessment via review of a remote blood pressure monitoring platform versus a patient recorded blood pressure log book
|
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement of early identification of bevacizumab-induced hypertension with usual care blood pressure monitoring
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
|
Frequency of clinician notifications of clinically significant elevations in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure readings
|
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
|
|
Improvement of early identification of bevacizumab-induced hypertension with remote blood pressure monitoring
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
|
Frequency of clinician notifications of clinically significant elevations in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure readings
|
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
|
|
Patient satisfaction with usual care blood pressure monitoring
Time Frame: 1 week after enrollment, 6 weeks after enrollment and 12 weeks after enrollment
|
Patient questionnaire containing seven questions, using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 equals "Strongly Disagree" and 5 equals "Strongly Agree" for six questions.
One question is measured using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 equals "Very Difficult" and five equals "Not Difficult At All"
|
1 week after enrollment, 6 weeks after enrollment and 12 weeks after enrollment
|
|
Patient satisfaction with remote blood pressure monitoring
Time Frame: 1 week after enrollment, 6 weeks after enrollment and 12 weeks after enrollment
|
Patient questionnaire sent via mobile application by Veta Health, containing seven questions, using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 equals "Strongly Disagree" and 5 equals "Strongly Agree" for six questions.
One question is measured using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 equals "Very Difficult" and five equals "Not Difficult At All"
|
1 week after enrollment, 6 weeks after enrollment and 12 weeks after enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Shalowitz, West Michigan Cancer Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 002-2024-Shalowitz
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.