The MIND-GUT Digital Pilot Intervention Study (MINDGUT)

April 15, 2024 updated by: Gianluca Tognon, University of Skövde

Exploring the Interplay Between Diet, Obesity, Mental Health, and the Gut Microbiome. The MIND-GUT Digital Pilot Intervention Study.

This 12-week pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a dietary intervention targeting diet, obesity, mental health, and the gut microbiome in promoting weight loss and enhancing mental health among obese men and women aged 30-50. Participants, excluding those with specific medical conditions, will be randomly assigned to either an intervention or control group using a meal planning smartphone app. Clinical assessments will include anthropometry, mental health questionnaires, dietary recalls, and stool sample collections. The study's endpoints include program retention, adherence, changes in body weight, mental health, and gut microbiome diversity. Statistical analyses will evaluate intervention effects and the potential mediating roles of the gut microbiome. This pilot study has implications for health policies, public healthcare, digital health companies, and the biotech and pharmacology industries. Future plans involve a large-scale intervention study in multiple countries with ongoing collaborations.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Objective of the Pilot Study and Study Design:

This 12-week randomized pilot intervention study aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a dietary intervention targeting diet, obesity, mental health, and the gut microbiome in promoting weight loss and enhancing mental health among obese individuals aged 30-50.

Participant Recruitment and Randomization:

Participants aged 30-50, excluding those with specific medical conditions such as psychiatric medication use, food allergies affecting diets, eating disorders, diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, sensory deficits, recent antibiotic use, participation in other studies, language limitations, coeliac/inflammatory bowel disease, planned weight management within 3 months, and pregnant/lactating/post-menopausal women, will be recruited for the study. Randomization will be conducted to assign eligible participants to either an intervention or control group using a meal planning smartphone app.

Clinical Assessments:

Clinical assessments will include anthropometry, mental health questionnaires, dietary recalls, and stool sample collections.

Study Endpoints:

The study's endpoints include program retention, adherence, changes in body weight, mental health, and gut microbiome diversity.

Statistical Analyses:

Statistical analyses will evaluate the study feasibility, intervention effects on body weight and mental health changes, and the potential mediating roles of these effects by the gut microbiome.

Implications and Future Plans:

This pilot study has implications for health policies, public healthcare, digital health companies, and the biotech and pharmacology industries. Future plans involve a large-scale intervention study in multiple countries with ongoing collaborations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
126

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Skövde, Sweden, 54128
        • University of Skövde
        • Contact:
          • Gianluca Tognon, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 30- 50;
  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2;
  • stable physical activity;
  • one person per household;
  • commitment to full protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • use of psychiatric medications (e.g., serotonin reuptake inhibitors);
  • use of weight loss medications (GLP-1 receptor agonists);
  • food allergies affecting adherence to the MIND diet;
  • diagnosis of eating disorders;
  • diagnosis of diabetes;
  • diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome;
  • sensory deficits (e.g., COVID-19-induced loss of taste/smell);
  • antibiotic use during the latest 3 months;
  • participation in another study;
  • language understanding limitations (i.e., not able to understand either Swedish or English); - coeliac/inflammatory bowel disease;
  • planned weight management program within three months;
  • pregnancy;
  • lactation;
  • menopause.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control group
The control group comprises participants who do not receive the specific Mind diet intervention but undergo the same procedures as the intervention group, including weighing at the beginning and end of the study, completing identical questionnaires, and providing fecal samples at recruitment and follow-up. They will also use the same meal-planning app as the intervention group.
Behavioral: Dietary intervention based on the MIND diet
A 12-week pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving N=126 obese participants (1:1 gender ratio) to assess protocol feasibility, including recruitment, retention, compliance, physical examinations, and gut sample collection. Sample size, calculated by a statistician, expects a 5% body weight change at follow-up (std. dev. 10%). We chose a 12-week duration for this pilot study to allow sufficient time to observe significant changes in both body weight and mental health.
Experimental: Intervention group
The intervention group consists of participants who receive the Mind diet intervention. Like the control group, they will be weighed at the start and end of the study, answer the same questionnaires, and provide fecal samples at recruitment and follow-up. Additionally, they will use the same meal-planning app as the control group, but their dietary pattern will be based on the Mind diet.
Behavioral: Dietary intervention based on the MIND diet
A 12-week pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving N=126 obese participants (1:1 gender ratio) to assess protocol feasibility, including recruitment, retention, compliance, physical examinations, and gut sample collection. Sample size, calculated by a statistician, expects a 5% body weight change at follow-up (std. dev. 10%). We chose a 12-week duration for this pilot study to allow sufficient time to observe significant changes in both body weight and mental health.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Program retention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Evaluation of participants' continued engagement in the program over time i.e., % of individuals completing the second and third 24h diet recall and % of participants returning to the second visit at the end of the intervention.
12 weeks
Adherence
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Measurement of participants' compliance with the assigned diet and program through 24h recall interviews, assessed comparing reported intake frequencies of each food group with the recommended intake frequencies according to the principles of the MIND diet.
12 weeks
Acceptability
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Assessment of participants' experience of the program through qualitative interviews, focusing in particular on: Perception of and experience with the intervention, intervention components (dietary plans, use of the app, etc.), factors influencing participants' engagement, perceived impact on behavior and well-being, interaction with the staff, suggestions for improvement.
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in eating attitudes at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of a score calculated after administration of the EAT-26 questionnaire at baseline vs. follow-up. The EAT-26 comprises three subscales, namely, Dieting, Bulimia and Food Preoccupation, and Oral Control. Higher scores correspond to a worse outcome.
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in stress levels at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of PSS-4 questionnaire at baseline vs. follow-up. The PSS total score is calculated by reverse-coding the positive items and summing the scores for all items. The total scores range from 0 to 56, from 0 to 40, and from 0 to 16 for the PSS-14, PSS-10, and PSS-4, respectively. A higher score indicates more perceived stress.
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in depression symptoms at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of PHQ-9 questionnaire at baseline vs. follow-up. The PHQ-9 is a tool to assist clinicians in identifying and diagnosing major depression. It has a maximum score of 27. Higher scores correspond to worst outcomes in terms of depression symtoms.
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in anxiety symtoms at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of GAD-7 questionnaire at baseline vs. follow-up. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting worst outcomes in terms of anxiety severity.
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in body weight at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of body weight at baseline vs. follow-up
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in % total fat mass at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of body % total fat mass at baseline vs. follow-up
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in % visceral fat mass at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of body % visceral fat at baseline vs. follow-up
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in waist circumference at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of waist circumference at baseline vs. follow-up
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in hip circumference at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of hip circumference at baseline vs. follow-up
12 weeks
Study effectiveness: change in microbiome variety at follow-up
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Comparison of number and types of species at baseline vs. follow-up.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Skövde

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Uppsala University
Göteborg University
University of Pavia
State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center
Kristianstad University
The Food Scientist AB (Sweden)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GT-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings