Proximal Humerus Reconstruction After Resection for Tumors : Comparison Between Allograft Prosthetic Composite and Cement Sleeve Prosthetic Composite
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Theses surgical options are complex, technically challenging, and at risk of complications (dislocation, infections, allograft pseudarthrosis…). High complication rate, length of the surgical procedure and post-operative recovery are a concern for theses frail patients.
Timing before being able to schedule the intervention (selection of the appropriately sized allograft, restricted access to grafts…) is also an issue. Postponing cancer resection surgery increases the risk of both local and distant tumor invasion. In case of secondary bone tumors, surgery is often decided for pain relief rather than with a curative intent. In cases where rapid bone graft is not available, and urgent surgery is required for pain or for oncological reasons, the bone loss can be compensated for by a temporary cement sleeve . In some cases, either because life expectancy has improved or has been longer than anticipated, or because the patient declined a second surgery for the implantation of an allograft, some patients can stay with the reconstruction with a long-cemented stem and cement sleeve.
The objective of this study was to compare functional outcomes and complications between APC and cement sleeve reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that, in cases of proximal humerus resection for tumors, reverse prostheses included in cryopreserved allografts would yield better clinical results and greater longevity than suspended prostheses with proximal metaphyseal reconstruction using a cement sleeve.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nancy, France, 54000
- CHRU - Centre chirurgical emile galle
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- tumors of proximal humerus
- Malawer type I resection of this tumors
- primary reconstruction
Exclusion Criteria:
- resection and reconstruction by prosthesis alone
- resection and hemiarthroplasty reconstruction
- resection and revision protheses.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
allograft prosthetic composite
patients treated with resection and reconstruction with reverse prostheses included in cryopreserved allografts
|
resection of proximal humeral tumors and reconstruction with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
|
|
cement sleeve
patients treated with resection and reconstruction with suspended prostheses with proximal metaphyseal reconstruction using a cement sleeve
|
resection of proximal humeral tumors and reconstruction with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Constant score
Time Frame: through clinical completion an average of 2 years
|
Shoulder functional evaluation score : between 6 points ( worse outcome) and 100 points (better outcome)
|
through clinical completion an average of 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
complication
Time Frame: through clinical completion an average of 5 years
|
dislocation, infection,
|
through clinical completion an average of 5 years
|
|
mortality
Time Frame: through clinical completion an average of 5 years
|
death: intervention-related or non-intervention-related, cause of death, delay of death
|
through clinical completion an average of 5 years
|
|
revision
Time Frame: through clinical completion an average of 5 years
|
reoperation (with or without implant extraction), cause of revision, delay of revision
|
through clinical completion an average of 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Francois SIRVEAUX, Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024PI057
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.