Remote Symptom Review in Patients With Implantable Diagnostic Holter (BIOMONI-DIG)

May 30, 2024 updated by: Andres Iñiguez Romo

Efficiency of a Clinical Process Based on Remote Review of Symptoms in Patients With an Implantable Diagnostic Holter.

To study the clinical and organizational benefit of implementing a methodology for monitoring patients receiving an implantable diagnostic BIOMONITOR III holter and successive models, consisting of remote review of alerts sent by the device via the HOME MONITORING remote monitoring platform and the transmission of relevant patient symptoms through the use of a specific application installable on the patient's phone. The efficiency of this methodology will be compared with a control group consisting of monitoring through the usual clinical practice of the hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Population of patients: Patients over 18 years old who require the implantation of an implantable diagnostic holter due to indications of syncope or atrial fibrillation, and who are willing to use an application installed on their phone to telematically send clinical symptoms that may occur during the active study period.

Design: Clinical, randomized, prospective, single-center study.

Investigational Device: BIOMONITOR III implantable cardiac holter and successive models with HOMEMONITORING remote monitoring system for constant monitoring of patient's cardiac signals. Installation of the Patient APP on the patient's phone for symptom transmission.

Overall Objective: To study the clinical and organizational benefit of implementing a methodology for monitoring patients receiving an implantable diagnostic BIOMONITOR III holter and successive models, consisting of remote review of alerts sent by the device via the HOME MONITORING remote monitoring platform and the transmission of relevant patient symptoms through the use of a specific application installable on the patient's phone. The efficiency of this methodology will be compared with a control group consisting of monitoring through the usual clinical practice of the hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Vigo, Spain, 36211
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients indicated for implantation of a subcutaneous implantable holter due to syncope or cryptogenic stroke (atrial fibrillation detection)
  • Patients over 18 years old.
  • Patients who consent to the installation of a patient application for telematic submission of patient-related symptoms.
  • Patients capable of using the patient application.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 80 years of age or, failing that, not able to use an application to send their symptoms.
  • Life expectancy of less than 12 months for any reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Homemonitoring + APP
The patients receive the usual standard treatment with remote holter monitoring along with an app for the notification of adverse events.
The patients will download an app through which they will be able to report adverse events related to their cardiovascular health.
No Intervention: Homemonitoring
The patients receive the usual standard treatment with remote holter monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TIME FRAME
Time Frame: one year
Time from the first alert by Home Monitoring of the implantable holter to the clinical diagnosis according to the patient's clinical indication.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of in-person visits in each group
Time Frame: one year
Number of in-person visits in each group
one year
Incidence remote transmissions activated by patient indication
Time Frame: one year
Number of remote transmissions activated by patient indication
one year
Rate of false positives
Time Frame: one year
Number of false positives, according to physician's diagnosis.
one year
Rate of symptoms sent by the patient
Time Frame: one year
Number of false positives (according to physician's diagnosis)
one year
Rate of symptoms sent by the patient that correspond to remote alerts sent by the patient
Time Frame: one year
Rate of symptoms sent by the patient that correspond to remote alerts sent by the patient (e.g., the symptom corresponds to a detected arrhythmia)
one year
Rate of symptoms not corresponding to detected arrhythmias
Time Frame: one year
Rate of symptoms not corresponding to detected arrhythmias(e.g., the symptom corresponds to a detected arrhythmia)
one year
Number of new non-cardiac clinical diagnoses discovered thanks to the symptoms sent by the patient.
Time Frame: one year
Number of new non-cardiac clinical diagnoses discovered thanks to the symptoms sent by the patient.corresponds to a detected arrhythmia
one year
Qualitative Patient Objectives
Time Frame: one year
Measured through a satisfaction survey on the use or non-use of the patient application to telematically send their symptoms
one year
Efficacy of implementing a clinical process based on remote monitoring of patient symptoms
Time Frame: one year
Change in patient interaction with the physician - fewer calls/visits to the hospital.
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Andrés Iñiguez Romo, MD, phD, Servicio Galego de Saude

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FF088

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.