Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Two Matrix Systems for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
Assessment of Clinical, Radiographical Efficacy, Operator Ease and Satisfaction and Patient Comfort in Restoring Class II Cavities in Primary Molars With Fender Mate System Versus T-Band System: An in Vivo Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Noha El-Sayed Fathi Abdou, Lecturer
- Phone Number: 002 01288737074
- Email: noha_elsayed1@dent.suez.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Asmaa Ali Emam Abo-Elsoud, Assoc. Prof
- Phone Number: 002 01220989854
- Email: asmaa_ali@dent.suez.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Apparently healthy children free from any systemic diseases.
- Patients showing Frankel's positive and definitely positive behavior.
- Parent willing to participate in the study and signed on informed consent.
Each child has at least two carious primary molars (class II) bilaterally, indicated for composite restoration with criteria as follow: -
- No history of spontaneous pain or provoked pain.
- Fully erupted teeth.
- Fully erupted adjacent tooth.
- Caries involving two surfaces - proximal and occlusal
- Absence of clinical signs or symptoms suggesting a non-vital tooth such as sinus tract, soft tissue swelling, mobility or tenderness to percussion.
- No pathological external or internal root resorption.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients showing Frankel's negative and definitely negative behavior.
Children having primary molars with:
- Caries involving less than or more than two surfaces
- Extensively damaged teeth
- Missing adjacent tooth.
- Mobility.
- Spaced dentition.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fender Mate matrix group
Twenty primary molars will be restored with composite restoration using the Fender Mate matrix
|
Matrix Systems used for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
|
|
Experimental: Conventional T-band matrix group
Twenty primary molars will be restored with composite restoration using T-band matrix
|
Matrix Systems used for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical assessment of Proximal Contact Points
Time Frame: Baseline
|
clinically assessment of the Proximal Contact Points using waxed dental floss in restoring class II cavities in primary molars using Fender Mate system in comparison with conventional T-band matrix.
|
Baseline
|
|
Radiographically Assessment of proximal overhangs
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Radiographically Assessment of the proximal overhangs using bite wing radiograph in restoring class II cavities in primary molars using Fender Mate system in comparison with conventional T-band matrix.
|
Baseline
|
|
Assessment of operator ease and satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
-Assessment of operator ease and satisfaction using questionnaire in restoring class II cavities in primary molars using Fender Mate system in comparison with conventional T-band matrix, which includes:
|
Baseline
|
|
Assessment of patient comfort
Time Frame: Baseline
|
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindukurthi MK, Setty JV, Srinivasan I, Melwani AM, Manasa Hegde K, Radhakrishna S. Restoration of Proximal Contacts in Decayed Primary Molars Using Three Different Matrix Systems in Children Aged 5-9 Years: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):70-74. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1929.
- Bhatia HP, Sood S, Sharma N, Singh A, Rajagopal V. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):748-751. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2060.
- Gomes IA, Filho EM, Mariz DC, Borges AH, Tonetto MR, Firoozmand LM, Kuga CM, De Jesus RR, Bandeca MC. In vivo Evaluation of Proximal Resin Composite Restorations performed using Three Different Matrix Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Aug 1;16(8):643-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1735.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- matrix system for 1ry teeth
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.