Virtual Reality in Invasive Techniques in Physiotherapy

April 29, 2025 updated by: Rodrigo Martín-San-Agustin, University of Valencia

Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality as a Distraction Tool to Reduce Pain and Discomfort Associated With Dry Needling Application

Dry needling is a common physical therapy technique that uses solid acupuncture needles that are repeatedly inserted and removed into the human body. These techniques, despite their benefits, can cause pain. The objective of this study is to analyze the use of virtual reality as a distractor in invasive techniques in physiotherapy. The hypothesis is that the use of immersive virtual reality, evoking relaxation situations, will reduce the sensation of pain during and/or after the technique. To do this, healthy participants will be recruited and the participants will be divided into two groups (experimental and control). Participants in the experimental group will undergo the dry needling technique on latent myofascial trigger points along with the use of immersive virtual reality. The same technique will be performed on participants in the control group but without the use of virtual reality. Pain during and after puncture and strength after puncture will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46020
        • Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have at least one identifiable latent myofascial trigger point in the muscles studied

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suffer any musculoskeletal or neural alteration that could alter the results obtained
  • Suffer from belonephobia or extreme and uncontrollable fear of sharp objects

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry needling and immersive virtual reality
Participants assigned to "Dry needling and immersive virtual reality" group will carry out a first session in which the dry needling technique will be performed together with immersive virtual reality and the results will be recorded. Likewise, after two weeks, these participants will repeat the dry needling session (with virtual reality) and evaluation, adding a previous exercise session.

The study consists of two sessions, separated by a period of two weeks. In the first session, a dry needling procedure based on the Hong technique is performed on the main latent myofascial trigger point of the medial gastrocnemius, vastus medialis quadriceps or biceps femoris muscles.

The procedure will be carried out simultaneously with the use of immersive virtual reality distraction software, applied through MetaQuest 2 virtual reality glasses. This procedure consists of immersive visualization (video and sound images that represent scenes related to relaxation).

In the second session, the same procedure will be repeated, with the addition that the participants will perform 3 sets of 10 repetitions (12RM intensity) of the plantar flexion exercises prior to performing the dry needling technique. of ankle, knee extension or knee flexion (depending on the muscle evaluated) with the aim of stimulating the area to be evaluated, simulating post-exercise fatigue.

Active Comparator: Standard dry needling
Participants assigned to "Standard dry needling" group will undergo a first session in which the dry needling technique will be performed and the results will be recorded. After two weeks, these participants will repeat the dry needling and evaluation session, in this case adding a previous exercise session.

The study consists of two sessions, separated by a period of two weeks. In the first session, a dry needling procedure based on the Hong technique is performed on the main latent myofascial trigger point of the medial gastrocnemius, vastus medialis quadriceps or biceps femoris muscles.

In the second session, the same procedure will be repeated, with the addition that the participants will perform 3 sets of 10 repetitions (12RM intensity) of the plantar flexion exercises prior to performing the dry needling technique. of ankle, knee extension or knee flexion (depending on the muscle evaluated) with the aim of stimulating the area to be evaluated, simulating post-exercise fatigue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain during dry needling
Time Frame: Immediately after technique application in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)
Pain perception during dry needling technique measured using a numerical pain rating scale (0-10)
Immediately after technique application in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain after dry needling
Time Frame: Immediately after technique application; 30 minutes after technique application; 1 hour after technique application; 6 hours after technique application; 24 hours after technique application in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)
Pain after dry needling technique measured using a numerical pain rating scale (0-10)
Immediately after technique application; 30 minutes after technique application; 1 hour after technique application; 6 hours after technique application; 24 hours after technique application in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)
Pain pressure threshold
Time Frame: Before technique; Immediately after technique; 30 minutes after technique; 60 minutes after technique in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)
Pain pressure threshold measured using an algometer
Before technique; Immediately after technique; 30 minutes after technique; 60 minutes after technique in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)
Strength
Time Frame: Before technique; Immediately after technique in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)
Strength measured using a hand-held dynamometer
Before technique; Immediately after technique in each session (two sessions separated by two weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín, PhD, University of Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3250436

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.