Comparison of Bone Graft and Photodynamic Therapy in Class II Furcation
Comparative Treatment Evaluation of Human Mandibular Class II Furcation Defects Using Bone Grafts and Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy-A Randomized Control Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, 562157
- Dr. Prabhuji MLV
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Systemically healthy subjects Age group of 25-60 years Presence of class II furcation defect on buccal surfaces of mandibular molars as determined by clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Vertical probing depth (VPD) ≥4mm Horizontal probing depth (HPD) ≥4 mm Gingival margin (GM) coronal to or at the level of the roof of the furcation
Exclusion Criteria:
Current and former smokers Administration of antibiotics in the last 6 months History of any periodontal therapy in the past 6 months Known allergic responses to bovine derived graft materials and photosensitizers.
Pregnant and lactating women.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Photodynamic therapy
After debridement photodynamic therapy was performed by applying indocyanine green photo sensitizer to furcation defect sites for 1 min.
A diode laser with the wavelength of 810 nm and 100 mW 0f power output in the continuous mode was applied to this site.
The indocyanine dye has high absorption in the infrared spectrum with an absorption peak near 810 nm, which is close to the emission of diode lasers.
This dye has low toxicity, a rapid elimination time and is a good photo sensitizer.
The furcation defects then received the graft hydrated with sterile saline.
The graft material compacted into the bone defect was similar to the control site.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
percentage of bone fill
Time Frame: 9 months
|
amount of bone formation
|
9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 9 months
|
clinical attachment level
|
9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KCDS/185/PG/2015-16
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.