Anorectal Manometery in Pediatric Chronic Refractory Constipation

October 5, 2024 updated by: asmaa abdelnaby, Ain Shams University

The Diagnostic Value of Anorectal Manometry in Pediatric Chronic Refractory Constipation With or Without Fecal Incontinence

Anorectal manometry and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) are becoming the investigation of choice for understanding the pathophysiology of chronic constipation with or without fecal incontenance in children in many institutions. In high resolution anorectal manometery we are able to gain information whether the symptoms are related to sphincter dysfunction, impaired sensation, or pelvic floor dyssynergia

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary objective: To assess different patterns of anorectal manometry in children with chronic refractory constipation with or without fecal incontinence.

Secondary objective: To determine the effectiveness of different modalities of treatment of chronic refractory constipation based on the anorectal findings. To assess the safety ,tolerability and effectiveness of lubiprostone in pediatric age group with chronic refractory constipation. To assess the effect of elimination of cow milk products in patient with chronic refractory constipation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: yosra mohamed mohsen awad, MD
  • Phone Number: 01001831590

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children and adolescents aged from 4 to 16 years.

  2. Participants fulfilling Rome IV criteria for the diagnosis of functional constipation.

    At least 2 of the following present at least once per week for at least 1 month:

    • 2 or fewer defecations in the toilet per week
    • At least 1 episode of fecal incontinence per week
    • History of retentive posturing or excessive volitional stool retention
    • History of painful or hard bowel movements
    • Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum
    • History of large-diameter stools that may obstruct the toilet The symptoms cannot be fully explained by another medical condition (Hyams et al., 2016).
  3. Participants who have chronic refractory constipation. Chronic refractory constipation (CRC) is defined as children who are unable to pass stools in spite of being on maximum laxative therapy and require daily rectal stimulation in the form of enemas or suppositories to pass stools 4-Is willing and able to keep a diary on his/her own and willing and able to complete a questionnaire.

5-The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participants who have anorectal malformation
  • participants who have neurological disease affecting lower limbs
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to lubiprostone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: single arm as all participant will receive the treatment
all participant will receive lubiprostone
Drug: lubiprostone , single arm
laxative
Other Names:
  • lubicont
Procedure: biofeed back sessions
Biofeedback for participants with dyssynergic defecation and participants with reduced rectal sensations
Procedure: botox injection
Botulinum toxin injection for participants suffering from elevated anal canal pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the manometric parameters in children with chronic refractory constipation
Time Frame: 1 year
To measure the percent of the most common manometric parameters in children with chronic refractory constipation e.g dyssengeric defecation and reduced rectal sensetivity and anal sphincter dysfunction.
1 year
evaluate the efficacy of oral administration of lubiprostone 8 and 24 μg once daily for 4 weeks in participants with chronic refractory constipation
Time Frame: 1 month
Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) Frequency at Week 1,2,3 and 4 A SBM was defined as any bowel movement (BM) that does not occur within 24 hours after rescue medication use (laxative, suppository, or enema). Participants will be given a diary to complete at home where they will record all details of each SBM including the consistency of the stool and the difficulty they have in passing it.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the effect of biofeed back sessions in children with dyssengeric defecation and in children with rectal hyposensetivity
Time Frame: 3 months
Participants with chronic refractory constipation and manometry parameters showed dyssengeric defecation or hyposensitivity will receive biofeedback sessions and the investigators measure the difference in bowel management scoring tool before and after the biofeedback sessions the higher the score the worest the condition
3 months
To determine the effect of cow milk protein free diet on chronic refractory constipation in children
Time Frame: 1 month
Participants will receive cow milk free diet for 4 weeks and investigators measure the difference in bowel management scoring tool before and after cow milk free diet the higher the score the worest the condition
1 month
To determine the effect of botulinum toxin injection in children with elevated anal canal resting pressure
Time Frame: 3 month
Participants with chronic refractory and manometric parameters showed high anal canal resting pressure will have botulinum toxin injection and investigators measure the difference in bowel management scoring tool before and after the injection the higher the score the worest the condition
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ain Shams University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: asmaa abdelnaby mohamed soliman, master, Assistant lecturer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • manometery in constipation

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings