Efficiency of Rigid Versus Non-rigid Indirect Anchorage During Canine Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult females Bimaxillary protrusion requiring first premolars extractions Full permanent dentition Good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria:
History of previous orthodontic treatment Abnormalities in teeth size and/or shape Vertical, transverse, or anteroposterior skeletal discrepancies Anti-inflammatory medication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-Rigid connection
side received a non-rigid 0.014-inch St.St ligature ligating the upper second premolar to the miniscrew.
|
a nonrigid connection is placed between the miniscrews and the second premolar to prevent mesial tooth movement.
|
|
Active Comparator: Rigid Connection
rigid wire 19 x 25 inch stst wire was place between upper first molar and the miniscrew placed between the first molar and second premolar
|
a rigid connection is placed between the miniscrews and the first molar to prevent mesial tooth movement.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
anchorage loss
Time Frame: 4 month
|
amount of anchorage loss of the upper first molar during canine retraction using digital model in mm.
|
4 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
vertical position of the upper second premolar
Time Frame: 4 month
|
The secondary outcome was to assess the change in the vertical position of the upper second premolar following canine retraction using indirect anchorage using digital models in mm.
|
4 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Cairo University (CairoU)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.