E4D Compare Adapted to Preclinical Endodontics
E4D Compare Adapted to Evaluate Pulpal Access Cavity Preparation in the D2 Preclinical Endodontics Course: Educational Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Second-year dental students enrolled in DDDS 719 Integrated Practice of Dentistry Lab II during 2022-2023 at Texas A&M School of Dentistry
- Students who have completed fixed prosthodontics preclinical course
- Students attending the endodontics preclinical course.
Exclusion Criteria:
- First, third and fourth-year dental students at Texas A&M School of Dentistry
- Second-year dental students NOT enrolled in DDDS 719 Integrated Practice of Dentistry Lab II during 2022-2023 at Texas A&M School of Dentistry
- Students who are not interested in participating.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-assessment - traditional method vs traditional method plus 3D software method
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
|
Compare self-assessment after traditional method only and with extra 3D software method
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
|
|
Grading - traditional method vs traditional method plus 3D software method
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
|
Compare technical skills after traditional method only and with extra 3D software method
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Grading - traditional/visual grading vs 3D software grading
Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
|
Compare traditional/visual grading to 3D software grading using different tolerance levels
|
baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks and 7 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB2022-1492-CD-EXM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.