Effect of a New HA Filler in Correcting Nasolabial Fold
New HA Filler Versus Juvederm for Nasolabial Fold Correction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seongnam, Korea, Republic of, 13620
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who had prominent NLFs with a WSRS score of 3 or 4 on both sides
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with active facial skin diseases or history of severe allergies, autoimmune disorders, or hypersensitivity to HA or any of the excipients contained in the investigational filler
- participants who had used a local topical preparation (steroid and retinoid) within 2 weeks before the study
- participants who had undergone chemical peeling, laser procedures, or acne treatments within 4 months before the study
- participants who had been injected with other biomaterials, including HA within 6 months before the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: New HA filler (Curea)
The left/right assignment was sealed in a nontransparent envelop.
|
Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Juvederm
The left/right assignment was sealed in a nontransparent envelop.
|
Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
WSRS
Time Frame: at 24 weeks after treatment
|
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale from 1 (no visible fold) to 5 (extremely deep and long folds)
|
at 24 weeks after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
GAIS
Time Frame: at 24 weeks after treatment
|
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale from 3 (very much improved) to -1 (worse).
|
at 24 weeks after treatment
|
|
Adverse events related to the procedure
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
|
Patients were required to report any adverse events up to 24 weeks
|
up to 24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bo Ri Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-2105/684-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.