Cohort Study on the Treatment of Severe Pneumonia with Traditional Chinese Medicine

September 25, 2024 updated by: Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Cohort Study on the Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Differentiation Scheme in Adjuvant Treatment of Severe Pneumonia Based on the Real World

This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study, with syndrome differentiation and treatment of traditional Chinese medicine as the exposure factor. Patients using syndrome differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine combined with conventional treatment of Western medicine are classified as the treatment cohort of Integrated Chinese and Western medicine, and patients using conventional treatment of Western medicine only are classified as the treatment cohort of Western medicine

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Severe pneumonia is a severe respiratory disease with high mortality, many complications and poor prognosis. Traditional Chinese medicine has certain curative effect in the adjuvant treatment of severe pneumonia, but there is a lack of systematic TCM syndrome differentiation scheme and its curative effect evaluation in the real medical environment. The cohort study on the efficacy of TCM syndrome differentiation scheme in the adjuvant treatment of severe pneumonia is conducive to providing new evidence for the optimization and evidence-based evaluation of TCM treatment scheme for severe pneumonia. Therefore, this study took severe pneumonia as the research object, standardized use of traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment scheme as the exposure factor, carried out a multi center prospective cohort study, used the 90 day mortality, 28 day mortality, treatment failure rate, etc., to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of severe pneumonia, and provided evidence for the application and promotion of traditional Chinese medicine in severe pneumonia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1016

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Haifeng Wang, doctor
  • Phone Number: 86-371-66248624
  • Email: wangh_f@126.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: jiangsheng Li, doctor
  • Phone Number: 86-371-66248624
  • Email: li_js8@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a severe respiratory disease with further development and deterioration of lung tissue inflammation, causing organ dysfunction and even life-threatening. Patients with SCAP are prone to hypoxemia, respiratory failure, septic shock, leading to multiple organ failure and poor prognosis. Western medicine treatment of SCAP mainly focuses on anti infection and mechanical ventilation. Although new intervention measures and management concepts are constantly optimized, the mortality rate of SCAP is still high. The treatment of SCAP is facing a severe situation, so it is necessary to seek new adjuvant therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • It met the diagnostic criteria of severe pneumonia;
  • Age ≥ 18 years old, regardless of gender.
  • Voluntary treatment.
  • Sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Patients with mental illness who are unable to cooperate or unwilling to cooperate with follow-up;
  • Those who are participating in clinical trials of other drugs;
  • Known allergic to therapeutic drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Treatment cohort of integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
Taking the use of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation treatment as the exposure factor, the continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for 3-5 days was defined as mild exposure, continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for 6-10 days as moderate exposure, and continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for more than 10 days as severe exposure. The exposure group was treated with syndrome differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine combined with conventional Western Medicine (treatment cohort of integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine).
Drug: traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)
Taking the use of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation treatment as the exposure factor, the continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for 3-5 days was defined as mild exposure, continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for 6-10 days as moderate exposure, and continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for more than 10 days as severe exposure. The exposed group used TCM syndrome differentiation therapy combined with conventional western medicine treatment (integrative medicine treatment cohort), and the non exposed group used conventional western medicine treatment without standardized TCM syndrome differentiation treatment (Western medicine treatment cohort). The treatment plan was formulated by the clinician, and the researcher did not intervene.
Western medicine treatment queue
The non exposure group (Western medicine treatment cohort) used conventional western medicine treatment but not standardized TCM syndrome differentiation treatment.
Drug: non traditional Chinese medicine (non-TCM)
Taking the use of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation treatment as the exposure factor, the continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for 3-5 days was defined as mild exposure, continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for 6-10 days as moderate exposure, and continuous use of traditional Chinese medicine for more than 10 days as severe exposure. The exposed group used TCM syndrome differentiation therapy combined with conventional western medicine treatment (integrative medicine treatment cohort), and the non exposed group used conventional western medicine treatment without standardized TCM syndrome differentiation treatment (Western medicine treatment cohort). The treatment plan was formulated by the clinician, and the researcher did not intervene.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day mortality
Time Frame: Mortality on the 90th day of treatment
Calculate the proportion of patients who died of the disease on the 90th day of treatment
Mortality on the 90th day of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day mortality
Time Frame: Calculate the proportion of patients who died of the disease on the 28th day after discharge
Calculate the proportion of patients who died of the disease on the 28th day after discharge
treatment failure rate
Time Frame: Early treatment failure was defined as clinical deterioration within 72 hours of treatment. Late treatment failure between 72 hours and to 28 days.
The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of treatment failure, which includes treatment failure that occurred early,late, or at both times.
Early treatment failure was defined as clinical deterioration within 72 hours of treatment. Late treatment failure between 72 hours and to 28 days.
time to clinical stability
Time Frame: every day in the treatment.
temperature of 37.2°C orlower, heart rate of 100 beats/min or lower, systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher, and arterial oxygen tension of 60 mm Hg or higher when the patient was not receiving supplemental oxygen.
every day in the treatment.
ICU stay time
Time Frame: the 28 days of the treatment phase.
length of ICU and hospital stays will be recorded.
the 28 days of the treatment phase.
hospitalization time
Time Frame: the 28 days of the treatment phase
length of hospital stays will be recorded.
the 28 days of the treatment phase
Mechanical ventilation time
Time Frame: the 28 days of the treatment phase
Time of invasive mechanical ventilation
the 28 days of the treatment phase
SOFA score
Time Frame: The sofa scores of the first, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eight days of admission and the first, second and third months after discharge were counted.
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.It is a scoring system for evaluating and monitoring the organ function of critically ill patients.The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 24. The higher the score, the worse the result.
The sofa scores of the first, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eight days of admission and the first, second and third months after discharge were counted.
Quality of life
Time Frame: The scores of the first, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eight days of admission and the first, second and third months after discharge were counted
Score according to the quality of life table,the minimum score is 12 points, and the maximum score is 60 points. The higher the score, the worse the result.
The scores of the first, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eight days of admission and the first, second and third months after discharge were counted
TCM syndrome score
Time Frame: The TCM syndrome scores of the first, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eight days and the first, second and third months after discharge were counted
Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Points.Including cough, expectoration, dyspnea, chest pain, anorexia and fatigue, each item is rated as 1-5 points from mild to severe.The minimum score is 6 points and the maximum score is 30 points. The higher the score, the worse the result.
The TCM syndrome scores of the first, seventh, fourteenth, twenty-first and twenty-eight days and the first, second and third months after discharge were counted
90 day readmission rate
Time Frame: The proportion of rehospitalization due to exacerbation within 90 days after discharge was recorded
The proportion of rehospitalization due to exacerbation within 90 days after discharge was recorded
The proportion of rehospitalization due to exacerbation within 90 days after discharge was recorded

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RESEARCH-SEVERE PNEUMONIA

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings