Guided Sausage Technique in Bone Regeneration As a Novel Digital Work Flow (RCT)
Innovative Approach in Guided Bone Regeneration Using Digitally Designed Surgical Guide
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare amount of bone resorption and flap dehiscence following guided bone regeneration with or without digitally designed surgical guide. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does it differ in amount of bone resorption between the conventional and digital guided bone regeneration?
- What is the difference between conventional and digital protocols regarding flap dehiscence following guided bone regeneration? Researchers will compare digital guided versus conventional technique to choose adequately which protocol to use.
Participants will:
- Receive guided bone regeneration around implant
- Visit the clinic after 2,7,14 days for detection any signs of flap dehiscence
- Bone gain and bone density will be assessed after 6 months
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tanta, Egypt
- faculty of dentistry Tanta university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- medium horizontal ridge defect according to clone classification
- must have a general health showing no contraindications for surgery
- must be at least 35 years old
- patients also have adequate soft tissue thickness and width of keratinized gingiva
Exclusion Criteria:
- no sign of uncontrolled systemic diseases
- non smoker
- not pregnant
- sever ridge deficient
- patients below 18 years old
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: conventional guided bone regeneration
a medium horizontal ridge defect will receive bone graft and covered with membrane
|
10 sites with medium horizontal ridge defect will be treated with bone graft (50%autogenous mixed with 50%xenograft) covered with bilayer collagen membrane stabilized by tacks
|
|
Active Comparator: digital guided bone regeneration
digital designed guide will be used in a medium horizontal ridge defect to place bone graft and covered with membrane
|
10 sites with medium horizontal ridge defect will be treated with bone graft (50%autogenous mixed with 50%xenograft) placed by digital designed guide covered with bilayer collagen membrane stabilized by tacks
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
flap dehiscence
Time Frame: 14 days
|
the flap dehiscence will be assessed using a UNC periodontal probe through the the wound opening of buccolingual distance between sutured flap margins
|
14 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
bone gain
Time Frame: 6 months
|
bone gain will be assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
|
6 months
|
|
bone denisty
Time Frame: 6 months
|
cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be used to asses bone density
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bassem nabil elfahl, assistant professor, faculty of dentistry Tanta university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- #R-OMPDR- 6-24-3122
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.