tDCS and Cognitive Training for Restrictive Eating Disorders
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Maya Day
- Phone Number: 612-625-1542
- Email: day0016@umn.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55414
- University of Minnesota
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-65 years
- Self-reported enrollment in outpatient-level treatment at local eating disorder treatment centers in the Twin Cities region, and meeting DSM-5 criteria for AN (mild severity, based on BMI greater than or equal to 17.0 kg/m2) or atypical AN diagnosis (based on MINI and EDE assessments).
- Participant must be capable of giving informed consent, based on UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) risk assessment.
- Sufficient spoken English so as to be able to comprehend testing procedures. Normative ranges on a C-RENAL blood panel (panel and ranges specified here: https://labguide.fairview.org/showtest.asp?testid=3321)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Substance abuse in the participant
- Neurological condition or other developmental disorder
- Serious psychiatric disorder known to affect brain functioning and cognitive performance (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder)
- Medical instability, which will be evident based on required outpatient treatment status. In standard eating disorders treatment, individuals who are not medically stable are referred to higher levels of care (e.g., residential treatment, inpatient). Therefore, if a participant is enrolled in higher level care for their eating disorder diagnosis, this indicates medical instability and they will be excluded from enrollment in this study.
- tDCS contraindication (e.g., history of craniotomy, history of metallic cranial plates, screws, implanted devices).
- Acute suicidality (suicidalideation with a plan or intent), assessed via MINI suicidality module and Beck Depression Inventory suicide item
- Acute homicidality (homicidal ideation with a plan or intent), assessed via MINI
- Moderate, severe or extreme AN diagnostic severity, based on BMI as per DSM-5 criteria (e.g., BMI <17.0 kg/m2)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active tDCS
10 Active tDCS sessions: 10 active sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with cognitive training tasks.
Device used is StarStim.
|
10 active sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with cognitive training tasks.
Device used is StarStim.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham (fake) tDCS
10 Sham (fake) tDCS sessions: 10 fake sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with cognitive training tasks.
The device will be on the participants head, but the current will not be active.
|
10 fake sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with cognitive training tasks.
The device will be on the participants head, but the current will not be active.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the rate of dropout.
Time Frame: 14 days average
|
Feasibility and tolerability measure 1. Evaluating for less than 20% dropout over the course of the tDCS for R-EDs study.
|
14 days average
|
|
Number of participants retained in the tDCS
Time Frame: 14 days average
|
Feasibility and tolerability measure 2 .
# of participants retained in the tDCS and cognitive training space of the study (80% or more retention will be used as the assessment threshold).
|
14 days average
|
|
probabilistic reversal learning task
Time Frame: 14 days average
|
Change from pre intervention to post intervention scores in probabilistic reversal learning task performance
|
14 days average
|
|
Dimensional set shifting task
Time Frame: 14 days average
|
change from pre to post intervention scores in dimensional set shifting task.
|
14 days average
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lisa Anderson, University of Minnesota
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PSYCH-2022-31551
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.