Vertical and Horizontal Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Techniques
Vertical and Horizontal Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh Versus Reinforced Perforated PTFE Mesh
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Abdusalam Alrmali, BDS, MFDS RCS, MDS
- Phone Number: 734-763-3325
- Email: aalrmali@umich.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Alice Ou, RDH, MS
- Phone Number: 734-763-3346
- Email: aliceou@umich.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- University of Michigan School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Physical status according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I or II, which includes patients who are systematically healthy or may suffer from mild to moderate, however well-controlled systemic diseases.
- Subjects having at least one free end saddle edentulous area of the posterior area of the mandible with moderate horizontal and vertical bone defects >≥3mm.
- Capacity to understand and accept the written conditions of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient oral hygiene.
- Smoking habit of >10 cigarettes/day (self-reported).
- Abuse of alcohol or drugs.
- Pregnancy or individuals attempting to get pregnant (self-reported).
- Acute local or systemic infections.
- Uncontrolled diabetes or other metabolic disease.
- Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction.
- Autoimmune disorders.
- Patients who underwent radiotherapy in the last 5 years.
- Patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy or who are immunocompromised.
- Any other contraindications for undergoing surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh
A customized CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh will be used to cover the bone graft
|
A composite graft composed of a 50:50 proportion of autogenous bone and a demineralized bone mineral will be positioned around the bony defect or placed in the membrane, depending on the group randomization.
The selected membrane will then be secured with screws to ensure a complete and stable coverage of the grafted area.
|
|
Active Comparator: Reinforced Perforated PTFE Mesh (RPM)
A Reinforced Perforated PTFE Mesh membrane will be used to cover the bone graft
|
A composite graft composed of a 50:50 proportion of autogenous bone and a demineralized bone mineral will be positioned around the bony defect or placed in the membrane, depending on the group randomization.
The selected membrane will then be secured with screws to ensure a complete and stable coverage of the grafted area.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ridge width changes in mm
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Radiographic changes of the ridge width based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan measurements
|
6 months
|
|
Ridge height changes in mm
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Radiographic changes of the ridge width based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan measurements
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Histological outcomes of the augmented bone
Time Frame: 6 months
|
In terms of the amount of newly formed vital bone, residual graft particles, and connective tissue (CT)/other non-mineralized tissue components as a percentage
|
6 months
|
|
The volumetric bone gain of the grafted area in mm3
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Radiographic changes of bone volume based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan measurements
|
6 months
|
|
Rate of complications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Percentage that had complications associated with each technique
|
6 months
|
|
Cost analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Difference in cost-effectiveness in dollars
|
6 months
|
|
Change in the mucosal thickness in mm
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in the mucosal thickness due to the provided space from baseline to the surgical mesh removal using an ultrasound
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hom-Lay Wang, DDS MSD PhD, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00262750
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.