Study to Investigate Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Motor Task for Remyelination and Functional Recovery

March 13, 2025 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Promote Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if stimulating the vagus nerve in combination with a motor task in people with multiple sclerosis can improve motor function. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is stimulating the vagus nerve safe and feasible after demyelinating episodes?
  • Does a paired motor task with vagus nerve stimulation improve motor function with someone who has multiple sclerosis?

Researchers will compare active vagus nerve stimulation to a sham stimulation to see if the paired vagus nerve stimulation can improve motor control.

Participants will:

  • Come in for study visits over a six month period. Study visits are three times weekly for the first month, then single follow up visits at two, three, and six months.
  • During study visits, participants will complete 30 minutes of the paired vagus nerve stimulation with a motor task, specifically the grooved peg test.
  • At various timepoints in the study, motor and disability tests will be administered to see if there are any changes in motor control for that participants. These tests include the timed 25 foot walk test, expanded disability scale, the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale - 29.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80010
        • Recruiting
        • Clinical Translational Research Center at CU Anschutz
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeffrey Bennett, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants ages 18-65 with diagnosis of multiple sclerosis at least 30 days from last relapse
  • Baseline grooved peg test time greater than or equal to 108 seconds for completion of the task (1 standard deviation below mean multiple sclerosis score).
  • Ability to sign informed consent
  • expanded disability status scale score (or estimated) of 2.5 or greater OR a clinical report of upper extremity dysfunction in their dominant hand

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current uncontrolled and/or clinically significant medical condition.
  • Primary progressive multiple sclerosis.
  • History of seizures or epilepsy.
  • Other central nervous system disease or significant brain trauma.
  • Bacterial or viral infection within the prior 30 days.
  • Prior treatment with total body irradiation, clemastine, bexarotene, or other experimental remyelinating agent.
  • Recent suicide attempt or continued expressed suicidal ideation.
  • Implanted devices, such as pacemakers, cochlear prosthesis, neuro-stimulators.
  • Abnormal ear anatomy or ear infection.
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or lack of use of contraception.
  • Unable to walk 25 feet continuously
  • Other significant disease or disorder that might impair study participation. Participants will be allowed to initiate or maintain background disease modifying therapy to reduce the risk of multiple sclerosis relapse and optimize recruitment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental - Active Stimulation
Participants in this arm will receive active stimulation during the paired motor task.
Device: Closed Loop Trans-Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation System
A closed loop system that delivers stimulation to the vagus nerve via the ear non-invasively following a trigger event.
Sham Comparator: Control - Sham Stimulation
Participants in this arm will receive sham stimulation during the paired motor task to create a control to the experimental group.
Device: Placebo
A closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation device that can deliver sham stimulation to the ear to simulate stimulation of the vagus nerve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in time to complete the grooved peg test
Time Frame: End of Study (6 months)
The participant will complete the grooved peg test with their dominant hand and will be timed while doing so. The change in time to completion will be tracked over the study.
End of Study (6 months)
Change from baseline of score of the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: End of Study (6 months)
The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer assessment evaluates movements of the upper limbs with score ranging from 0 - 66. A higher score indicates more function.
End of Study (6 months)
Change from baseline score of the Expanded Disability Status Scale
Time Frame: End of Study (6 months)
The expanded disability status scale scores range from 0 - 10, where 10 indicates full function.
End of Study (6 months)
Change in time from baseline to complete the timed 25 foot walk test
Time Frame: End of Study (6 months)
The timed 25 foot walk test is a performance measure where the participants walks 25 feet unassisted and the time to completion is recorded.
End of Study (6 months)
Change from baseline in composite disability metric
Time Frame: End of Study (6 months)
The fraction of participants in each intervention group at 6 months with improvement in disability will be determined by a composite disability metric composed of three elements: expanded disability status scale, timed 25 foot walk, and grooved peg test time. The metric will be deemed positive if there is a significant change in one or more of the measures as determined as follows: 1) decrease in expanded disability status scale score of 1 point (baseline expanded disability status scale score ≤5.5) or 0.5 point (baseline expanded disability status scale score of >5.5); 2) 20% decrease in timed 25 foot walk test; or 3) 25% decrease in grooved peg test time. The composite disability metric will be quantified by a trained study personnel.
End of Study (6 months)
Change from baseline in patient reported outcomes from the multiple sclerosis impact scale 29
Time Frame: End of Study (6 months)
The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale - 29 is a 29-item patient-reported measure of the physical and psychological impacts of multiple sclerosis. Participants are asked to rate how much their functioning and well-being has been impacted over the past 14 days on a 4-point scale. Higher scores indicate a greater disease impact.
End of Study (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Colorado, Denver

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Bennett, MD, Anschutz Campus - School of Medicine - Neurology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-1451

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Closed Loop Trans-Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation System

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings