Non Dilation on the Central Venous Catheterization(NDCVC-01) (NDCVC-01)
Effect of Central Venous Puncture Dilation and Non Dilation on the Success Rate of Catheterization
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Central venous catheter is widely used, but there are various complications. During the procedure of skin expansion with central venous catheterization, the use of a dilator can lead to complications such as hematoma, fatal bleeding, discomfort or serious threat to the patient's life. The aim of this study was to eliminate the procedure of skin expansion, to ensure the success rate of catheterization, to reduce complications, to reduce operation time, to improve efficiency, and to improve patients' comfort.
This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.The sample size was calculated by non-inferiority test:(1)the success rate of central venous catheterization was 97.98% according to Meta-analysis references;(2)α =0.025;(3)power 90%;(4)missed follow-up rate 20%, and ultimately 336 samples were included in the study,168 patients in each group.
Patients will receive written and verbal information about the trial before written consent is obtained. Randomization will take place on the day of surgery, and patients will be assigned to the intervention group (direct catheterization with non-dilation) or the control group (catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator) . The randomization is performed using concealed allocation where envelopes are prepared externally using a randomization list prepared by a research assistant.
Under ultrasound guidance, The patient will undergo central venous catheterization by an experienced anesthesiologist based on grouping information.In the control group, catheter was inserted after skin expansion with dilator, while in the test group, catheter was inserted directly with non-dilator.The success rate of catheterization, the total time of catheterization, and complications were recorded.The patients were followed up for 24 hours after surgery and asked about their comfort level.
Shapiro-Wilk test is used to test normality for continuous variables, with data expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and independent t-test is used for statistical analysis.For categorical data, the incidence of immediate complications is expressed as a percentage (%), and chi square test is used to statistically analyze the incidence of various complications.For the Primary outcome ,success rate of catheterization, the method of confidence interval is used. If the lower limit of confidence interval > negative non-inferiority threshold, the non-inferiority is considered. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sanqing Jin, MD
- Phone Number: 0086-13719366863
- Email: sanqingjin@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yingyin Zhao
- Phone Number: 0086-13678943039
- Email: zhaoyy78@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
- the Sixth Affiliated Hostipal, Sun Yet Sen University
-
Contact:
- Sanqing Jin, MD
- Phone Number: 0086-13719366863
- Email: sanqingjin@hotmail.com
-
Contact:
- Yingyin Zhao
- Phone Number: 0086-13678943039
- Email: zhaoyy78@mail.sysu.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) patients aged 18 years or older
- (2) patients with internal jugular vein catheterization
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1)Patients with infection at the puncture site
- (2)Patients with contraindications to central venous catheterization
- (3)Patients with imaging examination suggesting thrombosis in the internal jugular vein before puncture
- (4)Patients who refused to participate, did not sign or refused to sign the informed consent form
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: The test group:Direct catheterization with non-dilation
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, place the catheter into the vessel directly along the guide wire without using an dilator to expand the skin
|
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, place the catheter into the vessel directly along the guide wire without using an dilator to expand the skin
|
|
Active Comparator: The control group: Catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, after the skin is expanded with a dilator, the catheter is inserted into the vessel along the guide wire
|
Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the right internal jugular vein was punctured and a guide wire was inserted, after the skin is expanded with a dilator, the catheter is inserted into the vessel along the guide wire
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success Rate of Catheterization
Time Frame: Intraoperative (Start by locating the vessel until the catheter is confirmed to be in the target vessel)
|
The ratio of the number of successful catheterization to the number of participants in each group. Confirm that the catheter in the target vessel is defined as:(1)The syringe smoothly draws back blood;(2)After the fluid is connected, the infusion drops flow smoothly |
Intraoperative (Start by locating the vessel until the catheter is confirmed to be in the target vessel)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total time of catheterization
Time Frame: Intraoperative (Start with the tip of the needle touching the skin until the catheter is in the target) vessel
|
This total time was defined as the time from the tip of the needle touching the skin to confirmation that the catheter was in the target vessel
|
Intraoperative (Start with the tip of the needle touching the skin until the catheter is in the target) vessel
|
|
Incidence of immediate complications
Time Frame: Intraoperative (Start by locating the vessel until the catheter is confirmed to be in the target vessel)
|
immediate complications include:arterial puncture; pneumothorax; hemothorax; hematoma; Oozing blood; arrhythmia. definition: Arterial puncture : puncture of an artery with a needle during catheter placement. Pneumothorax :a collection of air or gas in the pleural cavity, which can cause the lung to collapse, confirmed by positive imaging. Hemothorax: a collection of blood in the pleural cavity, which can cause the lung to collapse, confirmed by positive imaging. hematoma: hematoma on the ultrasonography surrounding the vessel, severe hematoma defined as a visible hemotama large enough to be seen outside the skin. Oozing blood: Blood oozes from the skin at the point of puncture, or requiring dressing change. arrhythmia:a irregular heartbeat, include premature beats; atrial tachycardia; paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; atrial flutter; atrial fibrillation and so on. |
Intraoperative (Start by locating the vessel until the catheter is confirmed to be in the target vessel)
|
|
Patient Comfort Score
Time Frame: 24 hours after catheterization
|
Patients were assessed for comfort using the visual analogue scale(0-10).
0 was very uncomfortable, 10 was very comfortable, and the higher the score, the more comfortable the patient was.
|
24 hours after catheterization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sanqing Jin, MD, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883. No abstract available.
- Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.
- iData Research. Central Venous Catheter Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis, Global, 2020-2026. 2020. Accessed October 26, 2023
- 秦志均,等.改良中心静脉穿刺术对穿刺置管并发症的影响.现代临床医学2016( 04) :023
- Collier PE. Prevention and treatment of dilator injuries during central venous catheter placement. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Nov;7(6):789-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
- Kulvatunyou N, Heard SO, Bankey PE. A subclavian artery injury, secondary to internal jugular vein cannulation, is a predictable right-sided phenomenon. Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep;95(3):564-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00012.
- Oropello JM, Leibowitz AB, Manasia A, Del Guidice R, Benjamin E. Dilator-associated complications of central vein catheter insertion: possible mechanisms of injury and suggestions for prevention. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Aug;10(5):634-7. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(96)80142-x. No abstract available.
- Adhya S, Laha SK. Central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 30;357(9):944; author reply 944-5. No abstract available.
- Safety Committee of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. Practical guide for safe central venous catheterization and management 2017. J Anesth. 2020 Apr;34(2):167-186. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02702-9. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
- Lim T, Ryu HG, Jung CW, Jeon Y, Bahk JH. Effect of the bevel direction of puncture needle on success rate and complications during internal jugular vein catheterization. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):491-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da48.
- Lee YH, Kim TK, Jung YS, Cho YJ, Yoon S, Seo JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Hong DM. Comparison of Needle Insertion and Guidewire Placement Techniques During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization: The Thin-Wall Introducer Needle Technique Versus the Cannula-Over-Needle Technique. Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2112-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001167.
- Kim E, Kim BG, Lim YJ, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Kim HC, Choi YH, Park HP. A prospective randomised trial comparing insertion success rate and incidence of catheterisation-related complications for subclavian venous catheterisation using a thin-walled introducer needle or a catheter-over-needle technique. Anaesthesia. 2016 Sep;71(9):1030-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13543. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
- Song IK, Kim EH, Lee JH, Jang YE, Kim HS, Kim JT. Seldinger vs modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterisation in neonates: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1332-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
- Teja B, Bosch NA, Diep C, Pereira TV, Mauricio P, Sklar MC, Sankar A, Wijeysundera HC, Saskin R, Walkey A, Wijeysundera DN, Wunsch H. Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):474-482. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8232. Erratum In: JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jun 1;184(6):707. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.2175.
- Smith RN, Nolan JP. Central venous catheters. BMJ. 2013 Nov 11;347:f6570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6570. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024ZSLYEC-387
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.