Safety and Feasibility of an ExoNET for Supination Assistance for Stroke Survivors

January 7, 2025 updated by: James Lanphier Patton, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Assisting Stroke Survivors With Engineering Technology (ASSET): Design Project D3: Exoskeletal Networks for Forearm Supination

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of an exoskeletal network of passive, multi-joint springs for forearm supination. Also known as the forearm ExoNET, the device is a passive, robotic device that will properly assist forearm supination in the post-stroke adult population.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ExoNET, a passive robotic solution that provides a soft, biomimetic, and elastic alternative to robotics that embodies intelligence within the mechanical design. Several groups have been exploring performance enhancement using springs with custom-tuned parameters via optimization. Here, it is possible to have a simple reconfigurable system that can not only assist performance, but can also make training easier, faster, and more complete. This contribution has the potential to be clinically significant for rehabilitating neurologically impaired individuals because this proposal will investigate how motor learning can be facilitated through novel assistive technology.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of using the forearm ExoNET. Specifically, investigators would like to see if the forearm ExoNET tuned to assistance will lead to a reduction in forearm muscle activity and an increase in active supination range of motion. To accomplish this, we plan to have participants perform upper extremity activities of daily living requiring active forearm supination wearing the ExoNET. To achieve these goals, we will use a wearable surface electromyography (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) using Delsys wearable sensors on the forearm muscles.

Investigators hypothesize that individuals with post-stroke arm movement deficits will experience gains in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) measures that are significantly above their baseline levels while using the forearm ExoNET tuned to supination assistive support. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that a forearm ExoNET tuned to supination assistive support will lead to a significant reduction in arm muscle activity and no significant difference in range of motion across a series of upper-extremity tasks in adults without a history of stroke. Lastly, it is hypothesized that usage of a forearm ExoNET tuned to supination anti-assistance can be safe, feasible and tolerated by patients in a given treatment session.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60610
        • Recruiting
        • Shirley Ryan Abilitylab
        • Principal Investigator:
          • James Patton, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Valentino I Wilson, MEng
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Courtney Celian, OTR/L

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between the ages of 40-70 (to reduce confounding effects of aging on muscle, movement accuracy and proprioception)
  2. Have sustained a single, unilateral stroke at least 8 months prior to enrollment
  3. Severe to moderate upper extremity impairment (ARAT score 0-30)
  4. Ability to move their elbow and wrist when supported against gravity
  5. Cortical stroke with hemiparesis, tactile sensation
  6. Available medical records about lesion locations indicating the stroke was caused by a middle cerebral artery ischemic infarct

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bilateral paresis
  2. Diffuse/multiple lesion sites or multiple stroke events
  3. Hemispatial neglect or visual field cut that prevent visual feedback
  4. Shoulder pain and/or articular rigidity on the upper limb joint
  5. Severe sensory deficits indicated by the Two-Point Discrimination Test
  6. Botox injection to the affected upper extremity within the previous 4 months
  7. Aphasia, cognitive impairment, or affective dysfunction that would influence the ability to consent, perform the experiment, or follow commands
  8. Concurrent participation in upper extremity rehabilitation either as part of a research intervention protocol or a prescribed therapy
  9. Other neurological issues
  10. Meet any of the contraindications to Delsys Trigno Sensors:

    • Implanted with electronic devices of any kind, including cardiac pace-makers or similar assistive devices, electronic induction pumps, and implanted stimulators
    • Irritated skin or open wounds
    • Silver allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 - Assistance, Sham, Anti-Assistance
Group 1 receives all three interventions in the order of assistance, then sham (slack springs), then anti-assistance. Each intervention corresponds to different settings on the device.
The device spring components will be tuned to produce an assistive supination torque on the forearm.
The device spring components will be tuned to slack springs to serve as a placebo. The user will think they are receiving forces but in reality the device will not be providing any forces.
The device spring components will be tuned to produce a resistive supination torque on the forearm.
Experimental: Group 2 - Sham, Assistance, Anti-Assistance
Group 2 receives all three interventions in the order of sham (slack springs), then assistance, then anti-assistance. Each intervention corresponds to different settings on the device.
The device spring components will be tuned to produce an assistive supination torque on the forearm.
The device spring components will be tuned to slack springs to serve as a placebo. The user will think they are receiving forces but in reality the device will not be providing any forces.
The device spring components will be tuned to produce a resistive supination torque on the forearm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 2 (post evaluation), week 3 (post evaluation)
Observational measure used to assess change in upper extremity performance in individuals with a damaged nervous system
Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 2 (post evaluation), week 3 (post evaluation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer (FMUE)
Time Frame: Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 2 (post evaluation), week 3 (post evaluation)
Observational measure used to measure change in upper extremity impairment in individuals with a damaged nervous system
Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 2 (post evaluation), week 3 (post evaluation)
Box and Blocks
Time Frame: Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 2 (post evaluation), week 3 (post evaluation)
Measures change in unilateral gross motor dexterity
Tested at week 1 (baseline evaluations), week 2 (post evaluation), week 3 (post evaluation)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electromyography using Delsys
Time Frame: Treatment phases (week 1, week 2 and week 3)
Delsys sensors will be used to measure change in biceps activity
Treatment phases (week 1, week 2 and week 3)
Joint Kinematics using Microsoft Kinect
Time Frame: Treatment phases (week 1, week 2 and week 3)
Markerless joint tracking system will be used to collect changes in the joint kinematics to identify changes in limb movement compensatory strategies
Treatment phases (week 1, week 2 and week 3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU00218538

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.