Under-Resourced Adults With Chronic Pain eHealth Study (Flourish)

February 11, 2026 updated by: Eleshia Morrison, Mayo Clinic

Delivery of an eHealth Intervention for Under-resourced Adults With Chronic Pain (Flourish Study)

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of the dissemination of a cognitive-behavioral eHealth application (app) for pain self-management with Black and LGBTQ+ adults with high-impact chronic pain lasting at least 3 months and disrupting daily functioning (Implementation aim).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eleshia J. Morrison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Identify as Black and/or LGBTQ+
  • Reside in USA
  • Chronic pain diagnosis for at least 3 months.
  • Experience chronic pain that makes it harder to do their day-to-day activities
  • Have daily access to a smart mobile device (smartphone or table) and are willing to use the EPIO app.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to use the digital app for the study
  • Do not have daily access to a smart mobile device (smartphone or tablet)
  • Self-report cancer related pain, or severe untreated psychological illness (e.g., psychosis); and/or do not fit into one of the demographic categories listed in #1-3 for inclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Black adults with chronic pain
Behavioral: EPIO App
Participants will receive access to the app-based cognitive-behavioral pain self-management intervention program (EPIO) for 3 months.
Experimental: LGBTQIA+ adults with chronic pain
Behavioral: EPIO App
Participants will receive access to the app-based cognitive-behavioral pain self-management intervention program (EPIO) for 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in West Haven Yale Multiphasic Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The West Haven Yale Multiphasic Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) is a 52-item measure of various domains of the experience of pain, including pain interference (primary intervention outcome) and pain severity with daily functioning.
Baseline, 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Everyday Discrimination Scale-Expanded (EDS-E) score
Time Frame: Baseline
The Everyday Discrimination Scale-Expanded (EDS-E) is a self-report measure used to assess the frequency of various forms of discrimination experienced by individuals in their day-to-day lives. It consists of 10 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
Baseline
Change in Concerns About Pain-Short Form (CAP)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The Concerns About Pain-Short Form (CAP) is a 6-item measure of the nature of cognitive appraisals in response to pain and has been validated for use in diverse patient populations.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a 10-item questionnaire developed to assess the confidence people with ongoing pain have in performing activities while in pain. A raw score is presented with a range from 0 - 60, where high scores indicate greater levels of confidence in dealing with pain.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised (CPAQ-R) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-R) consists of 20 items, with 10 items each for the subscales of Activity Engagement and Pain Willingness. The items on the CPAQ are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (never true) to 6 (always true). Higher scores indicate higher levels of acceptance.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is a 14-item scale with seven items each for the anxiety and depression symptom subscales. For both subscales, a score of 8-10 indicates mild symptoms, 11-14 indicates moderate symptoms, and 15-21 indicates severe symptoms.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in Short Form-36 score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36-item, participant-reported survey that measures patient health and disability. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating maximum disability, and 100 indicating no disability.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The AUDIT-C consists of three questions, and each question has 5 answer choices valued from 0 points to 4 points. The AUDIT-C is scored on a scale of 0-12. A score of 4 for men and a score of 3 for women can raise suspicion of alcohol use disorder.
Baseline, 6 weeks
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks
The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) measures global perceived stress experienced by the participant over the preceding 30 days. The questions in this assessment tool ask how often the participant felt or thought a certain way during the past month. Possible answers include: 0 - never; 1 - almost never; 2 - sometimes; 3 - fairly often, and 4 - very often. Possible scores range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating a better outcome (less stress).
Baseline, 6 weeks
System Usability Scale score (SUS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The System Usability Scale is a 10-item measure of overall usability of the app regarding perceived usefulness and ease of use. The overall score is in a range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating better user satisfaction.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eleshia J. Morrison, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 23-009761

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings