The Effect of Education Based on Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and Tele-Monitoring on Rational Drug Use in Haemodialysis Patients (Haemodialysis)

November 13, 2024 updated by: Hatice CEYLAN, Akdeniz University

Principal Investigator

Patients with chronic kidney disease may show altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to many drugs compared to patients with normal renal function. Therefore, effective and safe drug use is difficult in patients with chronic kidney disease and especially in dialysis patients. In addition, some drugs may have nephrotoxic effects by causing further deterioration in renal function, especially in high-risk renal patients. Prevention of problems related to drug use in haemodialysis patients will be possible with rational drug use (RUD). RDM is defined as 'the set of rules to be followed in order for patients to take medicines in accordance with their clinical needs, in doses that meet their personal needs, in sufficient time, at the lowest cost to themselves and the society'.

Rational drug use has become an increasingly important concept today. In studies investigating rational drug use, problems such as incorrect use of drugs, prescribing more drugs than necessary, unnecessary injection recommendation/administration, unnecessary antibiotic consumption, and unnecessary use of expensive drugs have been identified. As a result of incorrect drug use, poisoning or decreased sensitivity to drugs are observed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The Effect of Education Based on Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and Tele-Monitoring on Rational Drug Use in Haemodialysis Patients

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Bucak
      • Burdur, Bucak, Turkey, 15300
        • Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older,
  • No communication or medically recognised mental problems,
  • Patients receiving haemodialysis treatment for 6 months or longer were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with psychiatric illness
  • Diagnosed with malignancy
  • Individuals who do not allow access to their information.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Randomized

The Effect of Education Based on Self-Care Deficiency Theory on Rational Drug Use in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis In the study, which will last for 2 months, the patients in the intervention group will receive pre-test training based on the Self-Care Deficiency Theory. Also weekly reminder messages will be sent regularly.

Other Names:

Education Based on Self-Care Deficiency Theory on Rational Drug Use
Other: Rational Drug Use Training
Rational Drug Use Training and Tele-monitoring will include information on drugs and their importance, rational drug use, rational drug use in haemodialysis patients, harms of irrational drug use, benefits of rational drug use, obstacles encountered in rational drug use, ways to overcome obstacles encountered in rational drug use, and increasing self-efficacy. The first training is planned to last approximately 30-35 minutes for each patient and the second training (summary training) is planned to last approximately 15-20 minutes. With telemonitoring, reminder messages will be sent to patients' phones at intervals.
Other Names:
  • Tele-monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rationanl Drug use Scale
Time Frame: two months
The Rational Drug Use Scale (RUDS) consists of 21 items and one dimension (Appendix 3). The items are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1-Never, 2-Rarely, 3-Sometimes, 4-Most of the time and 5-Always) according to their fulfilment of the statements. Only the 17th item in the scale is reversed. After the reversed item is reversed, the sum of all scale items gives the 'total scale score'. The total score of the EHRS varies between 21 and 105. As the total score obtained from AİKÖ increases, rational drug use increases. When evaluating the total score obtained from AİKÖ; if the total score obtained is between 21- 52, it is scored as low level, between 53-67 as medium level, and between 68-105 as high level.
two months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Akdeniz University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023/197
  • Hatice CEYLAN (Registry Identifier: The Effect of Web Based Education Based on Self-Care Deficiency Theory on Self-Care Power and Self-Efficacy and Perceiv)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings