Efficacy, Safety of Astragalus Membranaceus in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Efficacy and Safety of Astragalus Membranaceus on the Improvement of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Symptoms in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350000
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participate voluntarily and sign an informed consent form
- Age 50-85 years old;
- Memory loss for at least 6 months with a tendency of progressive deterioration;
- Mild or moderate patients, i.e. MMSE total score:14< MMSE total score<24, 0.5≤CDR-GS≤2;
- The highest likelihood of AD (medial temporal lobe atrophy visual rating scale grade 2 or higher on coronal imaging) as demonstrated by cranial MRI scanning and oblique coronal hippocampal scanning review at the time of screening;
- Hachinski Ischemia Scale (HIS) score < 4;
- A diagnosis of dementia according to the DSM-V and a diagnosis of "probable AD" according to the NIA-AA criteria;
- No significant positive signs on neurological examination;
- The subject has the ability to read, write, and communicate, the subject has a stable and reliable caregiver or at least has frequent contact with the caregiver (at least 2 hours per day, 4 days per week), the caregiver will help the patient to participate in the study, the caregiver must accompany the subject to the study visit, and there must be sufficient interaction with the subject to provide valuable information for the rating of the scales. information for each scale score;
- The underlying treatment for AD prior to enrolment remains unchanged, but needs to have been on long-term stable use for more than 4 weeks prior to randomisation to the subgroups, and the dose remains stable during the study period. Such drugs include:cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine;
- The TCM diagnosis was spleen and kidney deficiency. -
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-AD-induced memory and cognitive impairment, such as a diagnosis of other types of dementia, including, but not limited to, Mixed Disease Dementia, Vascular Dementia, Parkinson's Disease Dementia, Lewy Body Dementia, Huntington's Chorea-related Dementia, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, Brain Tumour, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Frontotemporal Lobar Dementia, etc.; Endocrine system pathology (e.g., Thyroid Disease, Parathyroid Disease) as well as Folic Acid, Vitamin B12 deficiency or any other causes of dementia; the presence of impaired consciousness, etc;
- A history of seizures; psychosis, including but not limited to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or delirium; and
- Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score >17;
- Significant focal lesions on MRI with one of the following: a. >2 infarct foci >2cm in diameter; b. Infarct foci in key areas such as thalamus, hippocampus, internal olfactory cortex, parafrontal olfactory cortex, angular gyrus, cortex, and other subcortical grey matter nuclei; and c. Cerebral white matter damage with a Fazekas Scale score ≥3;
- Patients who have taken other herbal preparations within the past 1 month;
- Astragalus allergy or contraindication;
- Presence of abnormal laboratory parameters: impaired renal function (blood Cr > 1.5xULN) or creatinine clearance (C cr) < 50mL/min or abnormal liver function (ALT or AST > 2xULN);
- Patients who refused or had contraindications to MRI or EEG (pacemakers, coronary and peripheral arterial stents, metallic implants, claustrophobia, or severe visual or hearing impairments); refused to have blood drawn;
- Hachinski Ischaemia Scale score ≥ 4;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients; and
- Other unmanageable clinical problems (e.g. neoplasms, HIV infection, syphilis spirochete infection, hepatitis C virus infection, active hepatitis B or other severe chronic infectious diseases, severe neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory and other systemic diseases);
- Patients who have participated in other clinical studies within the past 3 months;
- Those who, in the opinion of the investigator, need to be excluded
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Astragalus membranaceus
|
Astragalus tablets 15g, warm water to drink, once a day, take for 1 year, during which routine treatment should also be carried out.
|
|
No Intervention: Routine treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The primary efficacy outcome measure will be the absolute change in the Clinical Dementia Rating
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Clinical Dementia Rating scale scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating worse.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The absolute scores change in the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test [ROCF] recall score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The ROCF scale scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test-copy score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The ROCF copy scale scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Trail Making Test-A score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The Trail Making Test-A scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Digit Span Forward score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
TheDigit Span Forward score scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Trail Making Test-B score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The Trail Making Test-B scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Digit Span Backward score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The Digit Span Forward score scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Verbal Fluency Test score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The Verbal Fluency Test score scores range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale score scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute scores change in the Hamilton Depression Scale score between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Scale score scores range from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the blood pressure between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
To observe the changes of orthostatic blood pressure in patients
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the level of plasma β-amyloid40 (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Amyloid is one of the main biomarkers of dementia
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the level of plasma β-amyloid42 (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Amyloid is one of the main biomarkers of dementia
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the level of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Glial fibrillary acidic protein is one of the main biomarkers of dementia
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the level of plasma neurofilament light chain (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Neurofilament light chain is one of the main biomarkers of dementia
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the level of plasma hyper-phosphorylated tau-181 (ng/ml) between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Neurofilament light chain is one of the main biomarkers of dementia
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the neurite density index between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Neurite density index, range from 0-1, is the main indicator of neurite-oriented diffusion and density imaging (NODDI),with higher scores indicating better
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the orientation dispersion index between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Orientation dispersion indexrange from 0-1, is the main indicator of neurite-oriented diffusion and density imaging (NODDI) ,with higher scores indicating better.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in the isotropic volume fraction between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Isotropic volume fraction, range from 0-1, is the main indicator of neurite-oriented diffusion and density imaging (NODDI), with higher scores indicating worse .
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in thickness, between baseline and week 24.
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Cortical thickness is the main indicator of grey matter.Cortical thickness was obtained by analyzing structural MRI using the freesurfer.
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in volume, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Volume, is the main indicator of brain structure.Volume was obtained by analyzing structural MRI using thevoxel-based morphometry
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in delta, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Delta, is the main indicator of the cerebral cortex activity
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in theta, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Theta, is the main indicator of the cerebral cortex activity(range from 4-7.5Hz)
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in alpha, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Alpha, is the main indicator of the cerebral cortex activity(range from 7.5-14Hz)
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in beta1, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Beta1, is the main indicator of the cerebral cortex activity(range from 14-20Hz)
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in beta2, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Beta2, is the main indicator of the cerebral cortex activity(range from 20-30Hz)
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
The absolute change in gamma, between baseline and week 24
Time Frame: Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Gamma, is the main indicator of the cerebral cortex activity(range from 30-50Hz)
|
Participants were followed up for 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Huangqi_AD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.