Socket Preservation Using Biodentin Versus Xeno Graft for Single Rooted Teeth
Histomorphometric and Radiographic Assessment of Bone After Socket Preservation Using Biodentin Versus Xeno Graft for Socket Preservation of Single Rooted Mandibular Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: maxim gerges, MSc
- Phone Number: +201011466614
- Email: maxim.gerges@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt
- Recruiting
- Cairo University
-
Contact:
- maxin gerges, MSc
- Phone Number: +201011466614
- Email: maxim.gerges@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of both sex with badly decayed tooth indicated for extraction
- The ages of the patients ranged from 25 to 50 years.
- Patients with healthy systemic condition (Medically free)
- Adequate inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part.
- Good oral hygiene
- Cooperative patients who are willing to commit for 6 months follow up
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
- Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
- Smokers
- Patient with medical condition that contraindicates surgical procedures
- Pregnant or nursing.
- Substance abuse.
- Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as alcoholism or parafunctional habits severe bruxism or clenching.
- Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
- Patients on medication that may interfere with healing (corticosteroids, bisphosphonate, Chemo/radio therapy).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: biodentine group
|
biodentine used in socket preservation
|
|
Active Comparator: xeno graft group
|
biodentine used in socket preservation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
radiographic assessment to calculate bone width in millimeters after socket preservation in mandibular single rooted teeth using cone beam computed tomography
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
calculation of bone width gain in millimeters in extraction socket in mandibular single rooted teeth using cone beam computed tomography.
|
6 months postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Histomorphometric analysis of bone after socket preservation in mandibular single rooted teeth harvested by trephine bur
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
|
assessment of bone quality from extraction socket that were preserved bone will be harvested using trephine bur followed by implant placement
|
6 months postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Nov 5;8:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-126.
- Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.
- Starch-Jensen T, Vitenson J, Deluiz D, Ostergaard KB, Tinoco EMB. Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2022 Mar 31;13(1):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13101. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
- Henry PJ. Tooth loss and implant replacement. Aust Dent J. 2000 Sep;45(3):150-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00552.x.
- Iorio-Siciliano V, Blasi A, Nicolo M, Iorio-Siciliano A, Riccitiello F, Ramaglia L. Clinical Outcomes of Socket Preservation Using Bovine-Derived Xenograft Collagen and Collagen Membrane Post-Tooth Extraction: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;37(5):e290-e296. doi: 10.11607/prd.2474.
- Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol. 1998 Sep;69(9):1044-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044.
- Rajasekharan S, Martens LC, Cauwels RGEC, Anthonappa RP. Biodentine material characteristics and clinical applications: a 3 year literature review and update. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Feb;19(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0328-x. Epub 2018 Jan 25. Erratum In: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Apr;19(2):129. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0335-y. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021 Apr;22(2):307. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00553-7.
Helpful Links
- Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review
- Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Tooth loss and implant replacement
- Clinical Outcomes of Socket Preservation Using Bovine-Derived Xenograft Collagen and Collagen Membrane Post-Tooth Extraction: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes
- Biodentine™ material characteristics and clinical applications: a 3 year literature review and update
- Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEBD_CU_2024-01-26
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.