Optimization of Beta-lactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients With Cystatin C (OPTIMIZE-GNI)

July 29, 2026 updated by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Optimization of Beta-lactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected or Documented Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections With Cystatin-C (OPTIMIZE-GNI)

This is a Phase 4, interventional, multi-center pharmacokinetics (PK) study in up to 200 adult patients who are residing in an ICU. This study will compare the abilities of Cystatin C (CysC) and CysC-based estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) equations to characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime relative to Serum Creatinine (SCR), Serum Creatinine based Equation (SCRE), and iohexol in critically ill patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections. We hypothesize that CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations will characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels with greater accuracy and precision than SCR and SCREs. Iohexol will be administered to patients enrolled in the study and serve as the reference indicator of measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR), which is the gold standard assessment of kidney function. We further hypothesize that the predictive performances of CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations in estimating the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels will be comparable to iohexol. Firstly, population PK (PopPK) modeling will be used to develop meropenem and cefepime PopPK models informed by CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, and SCREs (renal function biomarkers), and iohexol clearance. Secondly, model diagnostics will then be used to compare the predictive performances of the renal function biomarkers PopPK models for each antibiotic relative to iohexol PopPK model. Lastly, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) will be used to design PK/ pharmacodynamics (PD) optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes based on the renal function biomarker PopPK model with the best predictive performance for use in the treatment of critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections and varying degrees of renal function. The primary objective of this study is to compare the abilities of renal function biomarkers (CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, SCREs) relative to iohexol to characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime in critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 4, interventional, multi-center pharmacokinetics (PK) study in up to 200 adult patients who are residing in an ICU. This study will compare the abilities of Cystatin C (CysC) and CysC-based estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) equations to characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime relative to Serum Creatinine (SCR), Serum Creatinine based Equation (SCRE), and iohexol in critically ill patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections. We hypothesize that CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations will characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels with greater accuracy and precision than SCR and SCREs. Iohexol will be administered to patients enrolled in the study and serve as the reference indicator of measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (mGFR), which is the gold standard assessment of kidney function. We further hypothesize that the predictive performances of CysC and CysC-based eGFR equations in estimating the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime at the population and individual levels will be comparable to iohexol. Firstly, population PK (PopPK) modeling will be used to develop meropenem and cefepime PopPK models informed by CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, and SCREs (renal function biomarkers), and iohexol clearance. Secondly, model diagnostics will then be used to compare the predictive performances of the renal function biomarkers PopPK models for each antibiotic relative to iohexol PopPK model. Lastly, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) will be used to design PK/ pharmacodynamics (PD) optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes based on the renal function biomarker PopPK model with the best predictive performance for use in the treatment of critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections and varying degrees of renal function. The primary objective of this study is to compare the abilities of renal function biomarkers (CysC, CysC-based eGFR equations, SCR, SCREs) relative to iohexol to characterize the PK profiles of meropenem and cefepime in critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections. The secondary objective of this study is to develop PK/PD optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes based on the renal biomarker function PopPK model with the best predictive performance relative to the iohexol PopPK model for critically ill adult patients with suspected or documented AMR Gram-negative infections.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
161

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
        • Torrance Memorial Medical Center
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502-2006
        • Harbor UCLA Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202-2608
        • Henry Ford Health System - Henry Ford Hospital
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Corewell Health - Infectious Disease
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Hospital - Infectious Diseases
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834-9997
        • East Carolina University - Infectious Diseases and Tropical/Travel Medicine Clinic
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine - Division of Infectious Diseases
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239-3098
        • Oregon Health and Science University - Adult Infectious Diseases Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213-3403
        • University of Pittsburgh - Medicine - Infectious Diseases
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24014
        • Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >/=18 years at the time of enrollment.
  2. Residing in an ICU.
  3. Documented or suspected Antimicrobial Resistant (AMR) Gram-negative infection for which the prospective participant is receiving meropenem or cefepime as part of their clinical management.
  4. Expectation that the prospective participant will reside in the ICU and receive meropenem or cefepime for the duration of the study, and that all study procedures will be completed.
  5. Expectation that IV access will be sufficient for drug infusion and either IV or arterial access will be sufficient to allow for all protocol-required blood sampling to occur.
  6. The prospective participant, or their legally authorized representative (LAR), is able and willing to provide signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prospective participant has a documented hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to iohexol, any contrast agents, or iodine.
  2. Prospective participant has a documented prior history of severe cutaneous reactions to iohexol, any contrast agents, or iodine.
  3. Prospective participant received iohexol on the calendar day of enrollment or the expectation that they will receive iohexol for clinical care (i.e., Standard of Care [SOC]) during the study.
  4. Prospective participant had a major surgery within one calendar day prior to enrollment.
  5. Prospective participant had a recent (within 6 months) burn involving > 25% of total body surface area.
  6. Prospective participant had a penetrating injury within one calendar day prior to enrollment.
  7. Prospective participant is currently receiving or is expected to receive any type of renal replacement therapy including hemodialysis or extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, during study period.
  8. Prospective participant has a documented diagnosis of diabetes with a serum creatinine (SCR) obtained for clinical care purposes (i.e., SOC results) >3 mg/dL during screening.
  9. Prospective participant has documented severe thyrotoxicosis as noted in medical records during screening.
  10. Prospective participant is homozygous for sickle cell disease as noted in medical history/records.
  11. Prospective participant has a documented diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome as noted in medical records during screening.

  12. Prospective participant is anuric* for >/ = 1 calendar day during screening AND has any one of the following documented conditions as noted in medical history/records:

    • Pheochromocytoma
    • Myelomatosis
    • Multiple myeloma
    • Paraproteinemia *Anuria is defined as urine production <100 mL in a calendar day
  13. Prospective participant is pregnant or breastfeeding.
  14. Prospective participant received or is expected to receive albumin from one calendar day prior to enrollment to end of study period.
  15. Prospective participant received or is expected to receive >/= 3 units of any blood product other than platelets from one calendar day prior to enrollment to end of study period.
  16. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, precludes participation because it could affect the prospective participant's safety.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm 1
Adult patients in the ICU receiving either meropenem or cefepime as part of their clinical management will receive one dose of IV iohexol 1500 mgI (5 mL) via slow push administration on Study Days 1 and 2 prior to the start of first or second daily meropenem or cefepime dose. N=200
Drug: Iohexol
Iohexol,N,N´ -Bis(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-5-[N-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-acetamido]-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalamide, is a non-ionic, water-soluble radiographic contrast medium with a molecular weight of 821.14 (iodine content 46.36%)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clearance (Cl)
Time Frame: Days 1-2
Days 1-2
Composite Euclidean distance score
Time Frame: Days 1-2
Summarizes predictive precision, accuracy, and bias of the cefepime or meropenem renal function biomarker population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model relative to the corresponding iohexol clearance PopPK model using the validation dataset.
Days 1-2
Intercompartment rate constant
Time Frame: Days 1-2
Days 1-2
Volume of distribution (Vd)
Time Frame: Days 1-2
Days 1-2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) optimized meropenem and cefepime dosing schemes
Time Frame: Days 1-2
For PopPK models
Days 1-2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 2, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 30, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 23-0013
  • 5UM1AI104681-12 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings