Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Xu Liu, MD
- Phone Number: +86 021-22200000
- Email: drliuxu@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
- No. 241, West Huaihai Road
-
Contact:
- Xu Liu, MD
- Phone Number: +86 021-22200000
- Email: drliuxu@126.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1.Adults aged 18-80 years diagnosed with persistent atrial fibrillation. 2.Ineffectiveness or intolerance to at least one Class I or III anti-arrhythmic drug.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major valvular diseases needing surgical intervention.
- Presence of a left atrial thrombus on recent imaging.
- Recent myocardial infarction or severe heart failure (LVEF ≤ 30%).
- Current Severe Infection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pulsed field ablation
Utilizing pulsed field ablation (PFA), combining pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with extensive ablation based on anatomical landmarks (including posterior wall box isolation) and electrogram-guided ablation, aiming to target all potential arrhythmic substrates.
|
Utilizing pulsed field ablation (PFA), combining pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with extensive ablation based on anatomical landmarks (including posterior wall box isolation) and electrogram-guided ablation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency Ablation
Using conventional radiofrequency ablation technology, combines pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with extensive ablation based on anatomical landmarks (including posterior wall box isolation) and electrogram-guided ablation, aiming to target all potential arrhythmic substrates.
|
Using conventional radiofrequency ablation technology, combines pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with extensive ablation based on anatomical landmarks (including posterior wall box isolation) and electrogram-guided ablation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Freedom from Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months after ablation procedure
|
Proportion of participants free from atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence at 12 months post-ablation.
|
12 months after ablation procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedural Safety
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
Incidence of procedural complications such as esophageal injury and pulmonary vein stenosis.
|
From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation Burden Reduction
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
Reduction in atrial fibrillation burden assessed through follow-up evaluations.
|
From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
|
Symptom Relief (EHRA scores)
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
Improvement in clinical symptoms (EHRA scores)
|
From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
|
Quality of Life (Short Form 36 Health Survey).
Time Frame: From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
quality of life measurements (Short Form 36 Health Survey).
|
From enrollment to completion of follow-up(at least 12 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Xu Liu, Shanghai Chest Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- EXT-III
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.