Precision Imaging to Evaluate Kaposi Sarcoma (PRIME-KS): A Device Feasibility Trial (PRIME-KS)

March 22, 2026 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine
While tremendous progress has been made against HIV, both in preventing the infection and in treating AIDS, the disease it causes, AIDS-related malignancies like Kaposi sarcoma (KS) remain a significant health burden, in both the U.S. and especially the developing world. In many cases, multiple KS lesions develop simultaneously, and may progress and regress independently. Photographs are an essential part of the evaluation for KS, as reflected in their formal usage described in the KS Tumor Assessment Manual of Procedures. However, acquiring a clear, informative photo is not trivial, since anatomy is 3D and conventional imaging is 2D. The importance of accurate, quantitative 3D information is especially pronounced for the treatment of KS because when a tumor responds positively to treatment, the initial change is usually a flattening of the lesion, without any significant change in the projected 2D area. To evaluate the vertical space, along with other characteristics of a KS lesion, we have created an innovative imaging system, SkinScan3D, utilizing new commercial liquid lens technologies and AI based image analysis software, with strategies borrowed from astronomical imaging techniques previously used on NASA space telescopes. In this study, the investigators will develop and demonstrate a protocol for recording measurable 3D parameters, which may be used in a longitudinal study to rigorously monitor therapeutic responses of KS and statistically compare with that of the conventional AMC criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University School of Medicine
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Feng Gao, Ph.D.
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lee Ratner, M.D., Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thomas Odeny, MBChB, MPH, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will enroll at Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine.

Description

Eligibility Criteria:

  • Have been diagnosed with histologically or cytologically proven Kaposi sarcoma (KS).
  • Patients may be off treatment or on treatment for their KS.
  • Has at least 3 cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma lesions.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Cohort A: No treatment
Consenting and eligible patients will have tumor assessments performed at baseline then up to 12 additional visits (or more if the device cannot collect the data at a visit). These assessments will be done by ruler or calipers, cell phone 2D photographs, and SS3D camera.
Cohort B: Active treatment
Consenting and eligible patients will have tumor assessments performed at baseline then up to 12 additional visits (or more if the device cannot collect the data at a visit). These assessments will be done by ruler or calipers, cell phone 2D photographs, and SS3D camera.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of successful capture of high-quality 3D images of cutaneous KS lesions
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 additional visits, each visit will take approximately 30 minutes (estimated to be 12 months)
Feasibility is defined as > 90% of lesions captured in the conventional imaging procedures are also seen in the SkinScan3D data, and that unique height and volume data is captured by the SkinScan3D for > 70% of lesions.
Baseline and up to 12 additional visits, each visit will take approximately 30 minutes (estimated to be 12 months)
Time to detect response or failure to treatment (Cohort B only)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 12 additional visits, each visit will take approximately 30 minutes (estimated to be 12 months)
Differences between the SkinScan3D and standard 2D in time to detect response or failure to treatment.
Baseline and up to 12 additional visits, each visit will take approximately 30 minutes (estimated to be 12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Pensievision

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lee Ratner, M.D., Ph.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 202501193
  • U01CA292765 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings