Comparison Between Low Level Laser Therapy and Active Oxygen Releasing Gel on Wound Healing Cleft Lip Patients (LLLT)
Effect of Low-Level Diode Laser Versus Active Oxygen Releasing Gel Application on Healing Outcome in Secondary Cleft Lip Correction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 12345
- Hager Abdelmonem Abdelaziz
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: can be done in any time after six months from the previous surgery if it severely disfiguring or in the preschool stage for children the time of surgery should be based on the severity of deformities
- primary cleft lip repair was done
- secondary lip repair with or without nose correction is indicated
- the patient didn't undergo any surgeries procedures in the last 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- previously subjected to secondary lip repair surgery.
- syndromic cleft lip patient.
- patient reporting abnormal reaction or scar healing in the previous surgery
- smoking patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: control group
|
|
|
Experimental: Low level laser therapy
|
after secondary cleft lip surgery to improve wound healing and prevent scar formation laser was used with group I and Gel was applied to Group II
|
|
Experimental: active oxygen releasing gel
|
active oxygen releasing gel was used after the secondary cleft lip repair surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Healing outcome of the wound is being measured by time
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
|
measurements done by ultrasonography repeatedly , before and 1 week after surgery , 3 months after and 6 months after
|
6 months follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mohsena Ahmed, lecturer of orthodontoics
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- OR SUR-106-1-C
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.