Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

August 1, 2025 updated by: Kexiang Liu, MD, Second Hospital of Jilin University

Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting : A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study on Graft Patency and Clinical Outcomes

This randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial was divided into two groups, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, according to the surgical method. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the RIMA-SVG surgical method in improving saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and reducing clinical complications. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two surgical method groups: RIMA-SVG Group (150 patients): SVGs are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA). Ao-SVG Group (150 patients): The aorta is clamped, and SVGs are connected to the ascending aorta (Ao).All patients will undergo CABG on a beating heart with sequential vein grafts to bypass at least two or more coronary vessels. The primary outcome is 1-year graft patency. The secondary outcomes include neurological complications, mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and surgical site infection event.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial was divided into two groups, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, according to the surgical method. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the RIMA-SVG surgical method in improving saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and reducing clinical complications. A total of 300 patients undergoing CABG on a beating heart will be randomized into two surgical technique groups: RIMA-SV Group (150 patients): SVGs are anastomosed to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA). Ao-SVG Group (150 patients): The ascending aorta is clamped, and SVGs are anastomosed to the aorta. All patients will undergo CABG via median sternotomy, and the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) will be used to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD). SVGs will be sequentially grafted to the circumflex artery, diagonal branch, and right coronary artery. The primary outcome is 1-year graft patency, assessed by coronary CT angiography and classified using the FitzGibbon grading system. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), neurological complications, and surgical site infection event. Patients will be followed at 12 months for clinical evaluations and imaging assessments. Inclusion criteria include patients aged 18 to 80 years undergoing planned CABG with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts and who are able to provide written informed consent. Exclusion criteria include additional cardiac surgeries, severe subclavian artery stenosis, unsuitable SVGs (e.g. bilateral varicosities), history of intracranial hemorrhage, active bleeding, malignancy, or emergency surgery. Randomization will be computer-generated, and all aspects of the study will remain blinded to ensure unbiased assessments.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China, 130000
        • The Second Hospital of Jilin University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18 to 80 years.
  2. Scheduled for their first planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).
  3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unable to provide written informed consent.
  2. Patients requiring other cardiac surgeries (e.g. valve replacement, congenital heart defect surgery, or aortic dissection repair).
  3. Patients with severe stenosis of the left or right subclavian artery.
  4. Patients for whom aortic clamping is infeasible due to calcification of the ascending aorta.
  5. Patients with bilateral SVG varicosities unsuitable for grafting.
  6. Patients with active malignancy.
  7. Patients with active bleeding or a history of bleeding tendency.
  8. Patients with previous intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke within 14 days preoperatively, or severe carotid artery stenosis.
  9. Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction.
  10. Patients requiring emergency surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: RIMA-SVG Group
Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) will be connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA).
Procedure: RIMA-SVG
Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA)
Other Names:
  • RIMA
Active Comparator: Ao-SVG Group
SVGs will be connected directly to the ascending aorta.
Procedure: Ao-SVG
The ascending aorta is clamped, and SVGs are anastomosed to the aorta.
Other Names:
  • Ao

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-Year Graft Patency
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
The patency of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) will be assessed 1 year post-surgery using coronary CT angiography
1 year post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurological Complications
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Incidence of neurological complications, including stroke within 1 year after CABG.
1 year post-surgery
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-surgery
Incidence of Perioperative complications related to CABG, including myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and other major adverse events.
2 weeks post-surgery
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Incidence of MACCE, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, Incidence of death from any cause within 1 year after CABG.
1 year post-surgery
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Incidence of MACCE, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, within 1 year after CABG.after CABG.
1 year post-surgery
Surgical site infection event
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery
Incidence of surgical site infection event during hospitalization and within 1 year
1 year post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Second Hospital of Jilin University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: kexiang liu, Ph.D., Second Hospital of Jilin University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JDEYXXGWK460

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the primary and secondary outcomes of the study-including baseline characteristics, graft patency results, perioperative complications, and 12-month clinical outcomes-will be made available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared with qualified researchers following study completion and publication, subject to approval by the trial steering committee and in accordance with ethical and data protection guidelines.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be shared via request from the corresponding author starting 6 months after study completion and publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the de-identified individual participant data will be granted to qualified researchers whose proposed use of the data has been reviewed and approved by the trial's principal investigator and data access committee. Applicants must submit a detailed research proposal outlining the scientific rationale, intended analyses, and data protection measures. A data use agreement must be signed prior to data release to ensure compliance with ethical and legal standards.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings