Postoperative Pain in Lumbar Disc Surgery (Pain)
Comparison of the Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management in Lumbar Disc Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34865
- Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation,
- Obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2),
- Infection in the surgical site,
- Known local anesthetic drug allergy,
- Chronic pain, and coagulation disorders were excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: erector spinae plane block
At the end of the surgery, while the patient was still intubated and in the prone position, the linear probe of a Samsung HM70 EVO ultrasound device was placed sagittally, approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the spinal cord.
After identifying the erector spinae muscle and transverse processes, a 22-G, 10-mm block needle (Braun Stimuplex Ultra 360, Germany) was advanced posterior to the transverse process after reaching the bone structure.
The location of the needle tip was then confirmed, 0.25% bupivacaine (20mL) was injected intermittently, and separation of the erector spinae muscle from the transverse process was observed.
The procedure was applied bilaterally (22 patients)
|
ESPB group received US-guided plane block, WI group received local anaesthetic wound infiltration
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: wound infiltration
In Group W, a dose of 0.5% bupivacaine (20 ml) was injected for wound infiltration into the surgery site.
(24 patients)
|
ESPB group received US-guided plane block, WI group received local anaesthetic wound infiltration
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
US-guided ESPB and WI on postoperative pain
Time Frame: postoperative 1 hour, 3 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours
|
Postoperative pain assessment was conducted in the recovery unit using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Standard postoperative intravenous analgesia included 75 mg of diclofenac sodium administered every 8 hours.
In cases where NRS was ≥4, rescue analgesia was provided with 100 mg of intravenous tramadol.
Anesthesia duration, surgical duration, NRS scores at postoperative 1 hour, 3 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours, time to first analgesic, and total analgesic requirement in the first 24 hours were recorded.
All side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, etc.) were documented.
|
postoperative 1 hour, 3 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Irem DURMUS MD
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023/514/250/34
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.