Osteopathic Manipulative Techniques in Collegiate Dancers
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Louisiana
-
Monroe, Louisiana, United States, 71203
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Members of the ULM dance team (HawkLine)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-competitive members of the team, those injured and those that opt out of the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Population
This pilot study will collect data from, diagnose, treat, and reassess dancers on the ULM dance team.
They will be asked to complete multiple questionnaires and a survey to determine their medical history, dance background, and mental health.
The Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire in Professional Dance (MPQDA) will be used to collect dancer demographics, history, and performance-related pain levels.
The Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) will collect data on the dancers' areas of pain and perceived movement quality and function while performing.
Then, the dancer will be treated for 15 minutes using OMT by the osteopathic medical student and supervising physician beginning with the area of greatest restriction within the lower body, including the lumbar spine, hips, knees, ankles, and feet.
Following diagnosis and treatment, dancers will attend a dance practice, and be re-evaluated immediately afterward.
After 24 hours, dancers will be evaluated again with the force plate.
|
Dancers will then individually be screened for somatic dysfunctions (SD) by a physician and VCOM OMS-III student doctor under their direct supervision.
OMS-III student investigators will receive training and be assessed on their abilities before performing OMT on subjects.
This will take place at the dancers' place of practice in a private area equipped with an OMM table.
The areas to be screened include the lumbar spine, hips, knees, ankles, and feet.
All diagnoses in these areas will be documented with specific notation for the area of greatest restriction on paper.
After making a diagnosis or multiple diagnoses, the dancer will be treated utilizing OMT for 15 minutes starting with the area of greatest restriction in the lower body by the OMS-III student doctor under direct supervision of a physician, should an adverse event take place.
The type of treatment(s) used will be at the discretion of the supervising physician and the VCOM student doctor.
They may use any OMT technique, exc
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in perceived pain after Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire in Professional Dance (MPQDA) will be used to collect dancer demographics, history, and performance-related pain levels.
The questionnaire includes the following blocks (questions contents are in parentheses):prevalence and localizations; subjective sensation of pain; temporal course of pain.
On a four-point ordinal scale from 'not' (= 0) to 'very' (= 3), accompanying symptoms (tension, redness, swelling, warming, restrictions of mobility and resilience) are asked.
|
7 days
|
|
Changes in balance after Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
This pilot study will utilize the IsoBALANCE® force plate and scoring system to balance in collegiate dancers before and after receiving OMT.
Distance in CM traveled along X and Y axis will be measured during 2 30-second bouts: the first with eyes open and the second with eyes closed.
A radius of movement from center (in cm) will also be calculated.
|
7 days
|
|
Changes in performance after Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The Dance Functional Outcome Survey (DFOS) will collect data on the dancers' areas of perceived movement quality and function while performing.
14 questions in the areas of ADL and dance/technique specific "requiring answers of agreement or disagreement to a statement" Max of 40 points; 1 general dance performance grade question (0-100 scale); and Technique section: Max 50 points.
Higher score reflects higher function.
|
7 days
|
|
Changes in performance after Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Screening 6 from Athlete's Form #2 on the International Olympic Committee Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool 1 (SMHAT-1) will be used to screen for eating habits and attitudes toward food, eating, weight, and body image that may identify risk factors of disordered eating.
The 9-item screen asks about food attitudes over the previous 14 day period.
It is scored on a 3 to Zero scale (3=always, 0=sometimes/rarely/never) with higher scores indicating more risk for disordered eating.
Topics included guilt after eating; desire to be thinner; satisfaction with body shape; trying to lose weight; avoidance of disappointing parents.
|
7 days
|
|
Changes in performance after Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) measures the degree to which an individual identifies with the athlete role.
The AIMS is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that was developed to assess domain-specific self-identification as an athlete.
The original 10-item AIMS version produced a more has been used in investigations of a wide variety of sport-related phenomena from its 3 sub-scales: social identity, exclusivity, and negative affectivity.
For this study, the participants will complete the 10-item version.
8 of the items are worded positively; 2 are worded negatively (inversely scored) using a 1 to 7 Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stephanie N Aldret, DO, CAQSM, FAOASM, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bowling A. Injuries to dancers: prevalence, treatment, and perceptions of causes. BMJ. 1989 Mar 18;298(6675):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6675.731.
- Werber B. Dance medicine of the foot and ankle: a review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011 Jan;28(1):137-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2010.10.005.
- Opdam KTM, van Loon J, Zwiers R, Kuijer PPFM, van Dijk CN. Corticosteroid Injections in Posterior Ankle Impingement Syndrome: A Survey of Professional and Elite Student Ballet Dancers. J Dance Med Sci. 2021 Mar 15;25(1):24-29. doi: 10.12678/1089-313X.031521d.
- 10. Teitz, C. C. (2000). Hip and knee injuries in dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 4(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313x0000400105
- Sammarco GJ. Diagnosis and treatment in dancers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Jul-Aug;(187):176-87.
- 7. Mainwaring, L. M., Krasnow, D., & Kerr, G. (2001). And the dance goes on: Psychological impact of injury. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 5(4), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313x0100500402
- Gunnar Brolinson P, McGinley SM, Kerger S. Osteopathic manipulative medicine and the athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2008 Feb;7(1):49-56. doi: 10.1097/01.CSMR.0000308664.13278.a7.
- Ofei-Dodoo S, Black JL, Kirkover MA, Lisenby CB, Porter AST, Cleland PM. Collegiate Athletes' Perceptions of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment. Kans J Med. 2020 Jun 25;13:147-151. eCollection 2020.
- Shah S, Weiss DS, Burchette RJ. Injuries in professional modern dancers: incidence, risk factors, and management. J Dance Med Sci. 2012 Mar;16(1):17-25.
- 2. Malkogeorgos, A., Mavrovouniotis, F., Zaggelidis, G., & Ciucurel, C. (2011). Common dance related musculoskeletal injuries. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 11(3).
- Benardot D. Nutritional Concerns for the Artistic Athlete. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021 Feb;32(1):51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-181
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.