New Technological Pathway for Gait Rehabilitation (LABODIMOTO)
Effects on Gait Patterns of a New Technological Pathway for Gait Rehabilitation in Patients with Movement Disorders
**Brief Summary**
The study aims to explore how the integration of visual and motor systems can be trained and enhanced to improve gait rehabilitation in patients with various neurological and cardiovascular conditions. Scientific evidence highlights that physical activity requires coordination and precise processing of visual, auditory, and sensory information from the external environment, which is then integrated at the brain level. This process establishes synaptic connections that direct the movement of arms, hands, legs, and the trunk through bottom-up and top-down mechanisms. However, inaccurate or incomplete perceptual information can impair performance, even when accurate visual stimuli are provided, emphasizing the importance of assessing and enhancing visuo-motor integration.
The research investigates the central mechanisms controlling peripheral muscle activation patterns during gait. While over-ground walking in healthy individuals generally does not activate the prefrontal cortex except in dual-task scenarios, evidence suggests that post-stroke patients exhibit increased prefrontal cortex metabolism during walking. Recent studies have shown that gait training with exoskeletal systems improves walking patterns in post-stroke patients by altering muscle activation patterns and increasing fronto-parietal connectivity.
This study seeks to answer the following question: How do central and peripheral mechanisms interact to influence gait rehabilitation outcomes, and what role do visuo-motor integration and neuroplasticity play in this process? To address this, advanced neuroimaging technologies such as fMRI, dtMRI, and NIRS will be employed to investigate these mechanisms in vivo.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +3909060128179
- Email: roccos.calabro@irccsme.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mirjam Bonanno, PT, MSc
- Phone Number: +3909060128179
- Email: mirjam.bonanno@irccsme.it
Study Locations
-
-
Maine
-
Messina, Maine, Italy, 98124
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo
-
Contact:
- Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +3909060128179
- Email: roccos.calabro@irccsme.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, corrected for age and education, equal to or greater than 20.
- Subjects capable of walking independently (Functional Ambulation Categories - FAC > 2).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairments that compromise the understanding and/or execution of the proposed exercises.
- Associated comorbidities that prevent maintaining an upright position or walking (e.g., hypotension).
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
- Patients with contraindications to the use of the technological equipment required for the dynamic movement pathway.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Innovative gait rehabilitation pathway
The group will be treated with a dynamic pathway with advanced technology for gait rehabilitation.
|
Participants will be assigned to either an advanced or traditional training pathway based on the protocol.
The innovative tehcnology pathway for gait rehabilitation will incorporate devices such as exoskeletons, virtual reality systems, and body-weight suspension (BWS) devices to enhance gait rehabilitation.
At the end of the training period, participants will undergo follow-up evaluation tests to assess outcomes.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional gait rehabilitation
The group will be treated with conventional gait rehabilitation strategies.
|
The control group will undergo a traditional rehabilitation program that follows standard clinical protocols for gait recovery.
This program will include conventional therapeutic exercises aimed at improving strength, balance, coordination, and functional mobility
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neural correlates of movement
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at five weeks
|
We will assess motor functions using clinical scales (e.g., Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity), to explore potential links between gait rehabilitation and motor recovery. Time Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 12 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (T2, 3 months post-intervention). |
From enrollment to end of treatment at five weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neurophysiological outcome
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at five weeks
|
A secondary objective is to investigate the neurophysiological changes associated with the intervention.
This includes analyzing EEG parameters (such as changes in alpha, theta, and beta rhythms) to understand the underlying mechanisms driving motor improvements.
|
From enrollment to end of treatment at five weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1786-92. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779. Epub 2008 May 8. Erratum In: Stroke.2008 Aug;39(8): e143.
- Chang WH, Kim YH. Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation. J Stroke. 2013 Sep;15(3):174-81. doi: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
- Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326632.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 45/2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.