Use of Inhaled Colostrum to Control Pain in Neonatal Frenotomy and Comparison to Inhaled Lavender Essential Oil

March 10, 2025 updated by: Parc de Salut Mar

Is Inhaled Colostrum as Effective as Inhaled Lavender Essential Oil for Pain Control in Neonatal Frenotomy: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Neonatal pain must be treated because it may have long-term negative effects. Frenotomy (clipping the tongue-tie) is a painful procedure where common strategies to relieve pain (give oral sucrose, let the baby suck, etc) cannot be used because the technique is performed on the tongue. Inhaling lavender essential oil (LEO) helps treat pain during painful procedures such as blood sampling, vaccination, and frenotomy. We aimed to determine whether smelling colostrum had similar effects as inhaled LEO during frenotomies. We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial between September 2023 and June 2024 and evaluated babies who underwent a frenotomy. We assessed pain using the NIPS score, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and crying time. After obtaining parental informed consent, we randomized patients into experimental and control groups. In both groups, we performed swaddling, administered oral sucrose, and let the newborn suck for 2 minutes. In the experimental group, we placed a gauze pad with two drops of colostrum, whereas in the control group, we used one drop of LEO 2 cm under the neonate's nose prior to and during the frenotomy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Our hospital Ethics Committee (CEIm-PSMAR) approved this study (reference code: 2023/10996). Prior to patient enrollment we obtained a signed informed consent from the neonate's parents. This study was conducted according to the ethics code of the Barcelona Medical Association and the principles of the Helsinki-Fortaleza Declaration 2013, at the neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital in Barcelona (Spain) within an area of influence of approximately 400,000 people, which experiences approximately 1,400 births per year. The target population for this study, and thus, inclusion criteria were healthy full-term neonates born at our center or less than 15 days old referred for a frenotomy, who had ankyloglossia according to the Hazelbaker tool between September 2023 and June 2024. We assess for the presence of ankyloglossia as part of the routine neonatal evaluation using the Hazelbaker tool to evaluate its impact on tongue movement and on breastfeeding. According to the Hazelbaker tool, ankyloglossia exists if appearance scores 8 points or less and/or function scores 11 points or less. We offer a frenotomy to all patients with ankyloglossia. During the study period, if we identified a patient with ankyloglossia, we offered the patient's parents the opportunity to participate in this study.

Patients were enrolled if their parents agreed to and signed a written informed consent. We only included patients who were breastfed, as after randomization we may need to get colostrum. Enrolled patients were randomized into case or control group by simple random sampling using sequentially numbered containers. During the frenotomy the neonate was taken to the neonatal unit and monitored with a pulse-oximeter (COVIDIEN Nellcor Portable SpO2 Patient Monitoring System PM10N, Covidien Ireland Limited, IDA Business & Technology Park, Tullamore, Ireland) before, during and after the procedure. For both groups we swaddled, administered 1 mL of oral sucrose, and let the newborn suck for 2 minutes prior to the procedure. The control group had a 7 x 7 cm gauze pad with 1 drop (43.75 mg) of 100% pure LEO (Pranarôm España S.L.) placed 2 cm under their nose for 2 minutes prior to starting the frenotomy and for the duration of the procedure, whereas the experimental group had a gauze with 2 drops of colostrum of the patient's mother placed in the same way. We used two drops of colostrum but only one of LEO because the odor of colostrum is more subtle than that of LEO, and in our previous studies [32-33] we had used one drop of LEO, and that is how we routinely perform frenotomies. Once the procedure was completed, we removed the gauze pad and recorded vital signs, whether the baby cried or not, the seconds crying lasted, and the NIPS score on a data collection sheet. If a neonate cried, calming techniques such as holding, swaddling, and sucking were employed. A blinded observer assessed pain by means of the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score (Figure 2) [40], crying duration, and whether there was a change in heart rate (HR) and/or in oxygen saturation (satO2) before and after the procedure.

In a previously published study where we compared performing frenotomies using complementary analgesia or not with inhaled LEO, we observed a mean (SD) crying time of 14.8 vs 24.6 (10.8 vs 27.6) seconds in favor of LEO [32]. In order to detect a difference of 10 seconds in crying time, we calculated that we needed a sample size of 71 patients per group in order to draw conclusions with a CI 95% and a power of 80%. We chose to evaluate pain by means of the increase of HR rather than via the NIPS score because in previous research, we obtained NIPS scores of 1.88-2.92 and 2.02-2.38, and a NIPS score less than 3 indicates no pain. We used the NIPS score to assess whether neonates exhibited pain when using inhaled colostrum instead of LEO.

We recorded demographic (sex, gestational age, birth weight, age in hours at the time of frenotomy) and clinical variables (HR and satO2 before, during, and after the procedure, whether the patient cried or not during the procedure, length of crying time in seconds, presence of side effects during the procedure (apnea, desaturation, others) and highest NIPS score within the first 5 minutes after the procedure). The attending staff were trained to assess the NIPS score before we started recruiting patients. Even though patients were swaddled, it was feasible to feel if they moved their legs or arms. The independent variable was the use of inhaled colostrum or inhaled LEO during frenotomy. The dependent variables were HR and satO2 pre and post procedure, presence of crying and duration, hours of life at the time of the frenotomy, and the NIPS score. The controlled variables were gestational age, sex, and birth weight.

Statistical analysis: Quantitative variables (gestational age, birth weight, age at frenotomy, heart rate pre and post-procedure, increase in heart rate post-procedure, oxygen saturation pre and post-procedure, decrease in oxygen saturation post-procedure, and duration of crying) are described using the mean, standard deviation and range; experimental vs control groups were compared with a Student's t-test. We assessed the equality of variances by using Levene's test and applied the result of the Student's t-test accordingly. Sex, the presence of crying, and adverse effects between the two groups are presented in percentages and compared using Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set for a p <0.05. To perform statistical analyses we used STATA version 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
        • Hospital del Mar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy full-term neonates born at our center or less than 15 days old referred for a frenotomy, who had ankyloglossia according to the Hazelbaker tool who were breastfed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Denial of the patient's parents to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Lavender essential oil
Patients were swaddled, were given 1 mL of oral sucrose, and we let them suck for 2 minutes prior to the procedure. We placed a 7 x 7 cm gauze pad with 1 drop (43.75 mg) of 100% pure LEO (Pranarôm España S.L.) 2 cm under their nose for 2 minutes prior to starting the frenotomy and for the duration of the procedure.
Experimental: Colostrum
Patients were swaddled, were given 1 mL of oral sucrose, and we let them suck for 2 minutes prior to the procedure. We placed a 7 x 7 cm gauze pad with 2 drops of their mother's colostrum 2 cm under their nose for 2 minutes prior to starting the frenotomy and for the duration of the procedure.
Use of the patient's mother's inhaled colostrum during the frenotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increase in heart rate
Time Frame: Immediately before the technique and up to 5 minutes after completing it
Increase in heart rate before and after the procedure
Immediately before the technique and up to 5 minutes after completing it
Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Immediately before the technique and up to 5 minutes after completing it
Decrease in oxygen saturation before and after the procedure
Immediately before the technique and up to 5 minutes after completing it
NIPS score
Time Frame: Immediately before the technique and up to 5 minutes after completing it
Assessment of the highest Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score
Immediately before the technique and up to 5 minutes after completing it

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Silvia Maya-Enero, PhD, MD, Hospital del Mar

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023/10996

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Colostrum

Search Similar Trials