16% Carbamide Peroxide Home Bleaching: Soft vs. Rigid Tray in a Randomized Blinded Equivalence Trial (Rigid tray)
Home Bleaching With 16% Carbamide Peroxide Using Conventional (Soft) Tray or Rigid Tray: a Randomized Blinded Equivalence Clinical Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over 18 years of age.
- Patients with vital teeth without restorations, single crowns, implants and/or bridges on the anterior teeth.
- Absence of dental caries in the teeth to be whitened.
- Patients with satisfactory oral hygiene and periodontal health, not undergoing periodontal maintenance and not using chlorhexidine mouthwashes. Patients with recession and no sensitivity were included.
- The absence of sensitivity was measured by applying air with the syringe of the dental equipment.
- Patients whose canines were at least A2-A3 in colour.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have already undergone bleaching (less than 5 years).
- Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with white stains or changes in enamel development or staining.
- Patients with a history of trauma to the anterior teeth.
- Patients requiring internal bleaching.
- Smokers.
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Patients with allergy to any of the bleaching components.
- Patients with oral mucosal changes (desquamative gingivitis, oral lichen planus, leukoplakia, etc.).
- Patients with medical conditions considered by the investigators to compromise the safety of the study or the individual patient.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: SOFT-TRAY. Patients in this group will have the whitening gel applied using the splint
Participants will apply the 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel to a 1 mm soft ethylene vinyl acetate tray for 2 hours per day.
|
|
|
Other: RIGID-TRAY. Patients in this group wear a 0.5 mm rigid tray.
Patients in this group should have the 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel applied in a 0.5 mm rigid polyethylene terephthalate tray for 2 hours per day.
|
Traditionally, home bleaching has been done with soft silicone trays.
Patients now wear aligners, which are rigid trays used for orthodontic treatment.
The use of rigid trays for home whitening has not been validated.
The aim of this clinical trial is to analyse the effectiveness, comfort and sensitivity perceived by patients when whitening with 0.5 mm rigid aligners.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dental Sensitivity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-10
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess whether there is a difference in the absolute risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity, using a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10, when using conventional (soft) trays or rigid trays during home bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide.
|
1 month
|
|
Patient's oral quality of life Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-10
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess whether there is a difference in patient satisfaction using a 0-10 visual analogue scale when using conventional (soft) trays or rigid trays for home bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide.
|
1 month
|
|
Whitening Efficacy CIEL*a*b*
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To evaluate whether there is a difference in whitening efficacy using the VITA Easyshade V spectrophotometer and the VITA Classical and VITA Linearguide 3D-MASTER scales when using conventional (soft) trays or rigid trays during home bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide.
|
1 month
|
|
Gingival irritation VAS (0-10)
Time Frame: 1 month
|
To assess whether there is a difference in the absolute risk and intensity of gingival irritation using a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10 when using conventional (soft) trays or rigid trays during home bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide.
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: LAURA CEBALLOS, PhD Proffesor, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Study Director: Victoria Fuentes, PhD Reader, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Principal Investigator: ISABEL GIRALDEZ, PhD Assistan Proffesor, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chagas AS, Freitas KMS, Cancado RH, Valarelli FP, Canuto LFG, Oliveira RCG, Oliveira RCG. Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers. Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):63-68. doi: 10.2319/031319-197.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
- Levrini L, Paracchini L, Bakaj R, Diaconu A, Cortese S. Dental bleaching during orthodontic treatment with aligners. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):44-54.
- Carneiro TS, Favoreto MW, Centenaro GG, Carneiro OS, Crovador CJ, Stanislawczuk R, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Does simultaneous versus individual-arch at-home dental bleaching regimen influence patient satisfaction? A randomized clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Dec;34(8):1263-1271. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12962. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- URJC_IDIBO_3
- Research Ethics Committee (Other Identifier: The Research Ethics Committee of the College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. Project No. 1026125)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.