Strategies to AchieVe Viral Suppression for Youth With HIV (SAVVY)

February 2, 2026 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Strategies to AchieVe Viral Suppression for Youth With HIV (The SAVVY Study)

Although there have been advances in antiretroviral treatment (ART) for HIV, adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AHIV) continue to have disparate HIV outcomes particularly viral suppression (VS), when compared to other populations likely related to multi-layered challenges (social determinants, cognitive development), system, and biomedical challenges including the reliance on oral ART as the only choice for HIV treatment. Given that approximately 1/3 of AHIV despite being in care fail to attain or sustain VS with resultant individual and public health risk, there is a need to develop real-world implementable interventions that can improve the participants virologic outcomes. The Strategies to AchieVe Viral Suppression for Youth with HIV (SAVVY) Study aims to 1) optimize personal ART choice by using the HIV-ASSIST clinical program to inform CHOICE counseling regarding an AHIV's preferred approach, including the possibility of long-acting injectable ART (LAI-ART); 2) facilitate access to the participants preferred choice through deploying a focused team to navigate barriers to attaining LAI-ART; and 3) decipher and address the patient, provider, and systemic barriers to the uptake and routinization of LAI-ART among AHIV by applying an implementation science framework and assessing cost-effectiveness providing critical data to support comprehensive approaches to optimizing ART and VS for AHIV, a key population identified in the Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States Initiative.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adolescents and young adults (AHIV) ages 12-30 years have disproportionately poorer outcomes across the HIV care continuum, including lower rates of adherence to oral ART (oART) and viral suppression (VS) than older adults, correlating with individual risk of poor health and disease progression and public health risk of secondary transmission. AHIV are a priority population in the Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States Initiative (EHE). Unique multi-layered factors (e.g., cognitive development, psychosocial determinants, system barriers) underlie AHIV's nonadherence and VS; therefore, AHIV-specific interventions are needed to address those factors and ultimately improve VS. Toward this aim, the investigators has shown that AHIV are more likely to be retained in care and achieve and maintain VS if cared for at clinics with youth-friendly structures and services, more likely to achieve VS with single tablet regimens (STR) vs. multi-tablet oral ART (oART) regimens, and have high interest in ART strategies not taken orally, specifically long-acting injectable ART (LAI-ART). These findings underscore the importance of engaging AHIV in decision-making and providing access to alternative biomedical strategies that obviate daily adherence, like LAI-ART, should the participant choose. Though uptake and roll-out has been slow, LAI-ART (cabotegravir/rilpivirine) administered q4-8 weeks has been approved for HIV treatment in those >12 years-old who have achieved VS-excluding up to 50% of all AHIV due to the decreased likelihood of VS. The investigators have reported provider biases and disparities in ART initiation by patient age and have concern that AHIV may have decreased access to LAI-ART, resulting in a tiered system that precludes LAI-ART access from those who may want and benefit from it most. AHIV need biomedical and care delivery innovations to address the challenges meeting EHE goals by optimizing feasibility of delivering novel biomedical tools for AHIV through minimizing medication and healthcare system barriers. The central hypothesis of the Strategies to AchieVe Viral Suppression for Youth with HIV (SAVVY) Study is that informed choice, counseling on ART options, and facilitating access, will increase rates of achieving and sustaining VS among AHIV. The study proposes to present and solicit informed choice of ART among both AHIV with and without VS, including facilitating LAI-ART (if VS can be achieved). For AHIV who prefer LAI-ART, the SAVVY intervention will support AHIV in successfully meeting or maintaining criteria (VL<50 copies/mL) for LAI-ART consideration, and deploy a focused team that facilitates access to LAI-ART. Study outcomes include VS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for AHIV undergoing the SAVVY intervention, identification of implementation barriers utilizing an established implementation science framework, and assessment of the cost-effectiveness of SAVVY using an economic-epidemiologic model. The investigators interdisciplinary team has expertise to implement the SAVVY study and the investigators anticipate that the results of The SAVVY study will inform the real-world implementation and optimization of LAI-ART AHIV toward reducing disparities in outcomes and ending the epidemic for the key population of AHIV.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
288

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Allison Agwu, MD ScM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • prescribed ART,
  • willing to sign informed consent (including communication with one's primary HIV provider)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relevant drug resistance mutations (per medical record) that compromises activity of Cabotegravir (CBG) + rilpivirine (RPV)
  • disallowed medications,
  • pregnancy.
  • Mental health, cognitive, or behavioral dysfunction that in the opinion of the site PI would impair participation;
  • severe illness/hospitalization at the time of enrollment,
  • plan to move away in the next 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Virally suppressed at entry (VL<50 copies/mL)

Participants are on ART and are currently virally suppressed. Participants will undergo CHOICE counseling and determine if the participant prefers to stay on oral ART or switch to LAI-ART. The SAVVY long-acting access team (SLAT) will facilitate prior authorizations and other logistic matters needed to access LAI-ART. The study will not provide drug.

Participants will participate in a baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 month detailed assessment of viral suppression and quality of life indicators, etc.
Other: The SAVVY intervention includes CHOICE counseling and shared decision-making regarding ART preference (informed by the evidence-based HIV-ASSIST) and facilitating LA-ART access
The SAVVY intervention includes CHOICE counseling and shared decision-making regarding ART preference (informed by the evidence-based HIV-ASSIST) and facilitating LA-ART access to that choice through the deployment of the SLAT team. HIV-ASSIST is an interactive tool that offers clinicians comprehensive, individualized validated patient-specific ARV decision support along with evidence-based supporting educational material. The free online, interactive tool is designed to augment interpretation of current HIV clinical practice guidelines (CPG).It will be included in the CHOICE counseling providing participants with patient-centered approach, specifically addresses the patient's expressed needs, problems, issues and concerns with a goal of providing accurate and unbiased information on available choices. After CHOICE counseling, if the participant chooses LAI-ART, the participant is referred to the SAVVY LAI-ART access team (SLAT) to facilitate access.
Other Names:
  • CHOICE counseling
  • HIV-ASSIST
Other: Not virally suppressed at entry (VL >= 50 copies/mL)

Participants are on ART and are currently not virally suppressed. The participants will undergo CHOICE counseling and determine if the participant prefers to stay on oral ART or switch to LAI-ART. As the participant will not be able to switch to LAI-ART given the viremic state, the participant will have q2 week monitoring (for 3 months) of the viral load and if the participant becomes suppressed will then be offered CHOICE counseling again and can select at that point if the participant wants to stay on oral or transition to LAI-ART. The SAVVY long-acting access team will facilitate prior authorizations and other logistic matters needed to access LAI-ART. The study will not provide drug.

If the participant has not become suppressed by 3 months the participant would continue to be monitored by standard of care practices.

Participants will participate in a baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 month detailed assessment of viral suppression and quality of life indicators, etc.
Other: The SAVVY intervention includes CHOICE counseling and shared decision-making regarding ART preference (informed by the evidence-based HIV-ASSIST) and facilitating LA-ART access
The SAVVY intervention includes CHOICE counseling and shared decision-making regarding ART preference (informed by the evidence-based HIV-ASSIST) and facilitating LA-ART access to that choice through the deployment of the SLAT team. HIV-ASSIST is an interactive tool that offers clinicians comprehensive, individualized validated patient-specific ARV decision support along with evidence-based supporting educational material. The free online, interactive tool is designed to augment interpretation of current HIV clinical practice guidelines (CPG).It will be included in the CHOICE counseling providing participants with patient-centered approach, specifically addresses the patient's expressed needs, problems, issues and concerns with a goal of providing accurate and unbiased information on available choices. After CHOICE counseling, if the participant chooses LAI-ART, the participant is referred to the SAVVY LAI-ART access team (SLAT) to facilitate access.
Other Names:
  • CHOICE counseling
  • HIV-ASSIST

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who reach viral suppression
Time Frame: 12 months
Viral suppression (VL<20 copies/mL)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life (HRQOL) as assessed by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: 12 months
Health related quality of life as measured by the SF-12. Score range: 0-100 with higher score indicating better quality of life.
12 months
Self-Efficacy as assessed by the Self-efficacy scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Self-efficacy as measured by the self-efficacy scale. Scale range: 1 (cannot do it at all) to 10 (certain can do it).
12 months
Barriers to treatment adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Barriers to treatment as assessed by asking a series of 10 questions (Yes/No responses) addressing common Barriers to Treatment Adherence reported by individuals living with HIV, including housing, insurance, transportation, and other domains. Score range: 0-10 with a higher number of items reported equating to greater number of barriers.
12 months
HIV stigma scale
Time Frame: 12 months
HIV stigma as measured by the HIV stigma scale. The questionnaire uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (4). Possible score range of 3 to 12; higher scores reflect a higher level of perceived HIV-related stigma.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Allison Agwu, MD, SCM, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00421059
  • R01MH134724 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings