Effects of Uremia on Brachial Plexus Electrophysiology and Brachial Plexus Block
Effects of Uremia on Brachial Plexus Electrophysiology and Brachial Plexus Block: One Prospective Parallel Cohort Study
As a late stage of renal failure, uremia not only leads to severe impairment of renal function in patients, but also often leads to a variety of complications, among which multiple peripheral neuropathy is particularly common. This lesion is mainly caused by the combination of multiple mechanisms, such as the accumulation of uremic toxins, electrolyte disorder, nutrient deficiency and factors related to hemodialysis. Therefore, it is important clinical significance to deeply explore the effects of uremia on electrophysiological properties and nerve block of brachial plexus.
At present, there are relatively few studies on the effects of uremia on the brachial plexus, especially the prospective parallel cohort studies on its electrophysiological properties and nerve block. As a new anesthetic technique, ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block has the advantages of precise positioning, scientific administration, reducing complications and improved safety, but the application effect and safety in uremic patients still need to be further verified.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Uremia group [group U]
- Patients aged 18 years and older
- ASA classification I-IV
- BMI 18.5-29.9
- Patients with uremia planning to undergo forearm or hand surgery
- Diagnostic criteria: Patients must meet the internationally recognized diagnostic criteria for uremia and require hemodialysis
- Informed consent: Patients or their legal representatives must sign an informed consent form, agreeing to participate in this study and undergo related examinations and treatments
Non-uremia group [Group N]
- Patients aged 18 years and older
- ASA classification I-IV
- BMI 18.5-29.9
- Patients planning to undergo forearm or hand surgery
- In addition to possibly having diabetes, patients should not have any other diseases that could cause peripheral neuropathy
- The patient or their legal representative must sign an informed consent form, agreeing to participate in this study and receive the relevant examinations and treatments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals allergic to study medications (such as ropivacaine)
- Those with contraindications to local anesthesia or nerve blockades, such as coagulation disorders, infections, etc.
- Those with severe cardiovascular or respiratory diseases
- Those unable to comply with study requirements, such as cognitive impairment, mental disorders, etc.
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Uremia group (U group)
|
Adjust the neural stimulator, with a stimulation duration of 0.1 ms, a stimulation frequency of 1Hz, and a stimulation current of 1.0mA.
Under ultrasound guidance, the needle tip is used to touch the radial nerve, ulnar nerve, median nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve respectively, until a clear motor response is observed in the corresponding muscles.
Thereafter, the minimum stimulation threshold current is verified by reducing the current until the distal motor response disappears.
If no motor response is elicited, the current intensity is appropriately increased to achieve a motor response of the extensor tendon of the radial nerve, and the flexor tendon motor responses of the ulnar nerve, median nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve.
|
|
Experimental: Non-uremia group (Group N)
|
Adjust the neural stimulator, with a stimulation duration of 0.1 ms, a stimulation frequency of 1Hz, and a stimulation current of 1.0mA.
Under ultrasound guidance, the needle tip is used to touch the radial nerve, ulnar nerve, median nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve respectively, until a clear motor response is observed in the corresponding muscles.
Thereafter, the minimum stimulation threshold current is verified by reducing the current until the distal motor response disappears.
If no motor response is elicited, the current intensity is appropriately increased to achieve a motor response of the extensor tendon of the radial nerve, and the flexor tendon motor responses of the ulnar nerve, median nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference in the minimum excitatory threshold current for motor electrical stimulation of the radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous nerves between patients with uremia and those without uremia.
Time Frame: one year
|
Under ultrasound guidance, using a high-frequency linear array transducer and a dedicated nerve stimulation needle, the nerves are localized in-plane technique under direct visualization.
Adjust the nerve stimulator with a stimulation duration of 0.1 ms, a stimulation frequency of 1Hz, and a stimulation current of 1.0mA.
Under ultrasound guidance, the needle tip is used to touch the radial nerve, ulnar nerve, median nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve respectively, until a clear motor response is observed in the corresponding muscles.
Thereafter, the minimum stimulation threshold current is verified by reducing the current until the distal motor response disappears.
If no motor response is elicited, the current intensity is appropriately increased to achieve motor responses of the extensor tendon of the radial nerve, and the flexor tendons of the ulnar nerve, median nerve, and musculocutaneous nerve.
|
one year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The onset time of forearm sensory block in two groups of patients
Time Frame: one year
|
Testing the time for cold sensation disappearance using alcohol swabs
|
one year
|
|
Onset time of forearm motor block in two groups of patients
Time Frame: one year
|
Time when forearm muscle strength drops to grade 0.
|
one year
|
|
The recovery time of forearm sensation in two groups of patients
Time Frame: one year
|
Forearm tactile recovery time
|
one year
|
|
Recovery time for forearm movement in two groups of patients
Time Frame: one year
|
Time for forearm muscle strength to recover to pre-surgery status
|
one year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY20250123-09
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.