PRospective Observational Study of STereotactic Body rAdiation Therapy With Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Organ-confined High-risk Prostate Cancer: the PROSTAR Trial (PROSTAR)

July 29, 2025 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy and the 5th common cause of cancer-related mortality in men worldwide. The majority of patients with PCa is diagnosed with potentially curable disease and its management includes different approaches, such as surgery, Radiation Therapy (RT) and Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), for exclusive use or in combination each other. Randomized clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionated RT (i.e., 2.5-4 Gy per fraction) has become a valid alternative to conventionally fractionated RT in patients with PCa. The rationale of hypofractionation is based on the strong radiobiological evidence of the low α/β ratio of PCa cells (1.5-2 Gy) and the greater sensitivity to high dose per fraction. Data suggests that prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is an alternative treatment strategy for localized PCa with promising results in terms of disease control and toxicity, not inferior to conventionally fractionated RT. A systematic review of over 6000 men underwent prostate SBRT on prospective studies has demonstrated that this treatment provides favorable patient's quality of life, excellent disease control, and results in minimal serious acute or late toxicity.

Almost all the published studies, investigated the role of SBRT for organ-confined low- and intermediate favorable-risk disease. However, the HYPO-RT-PC trial addressed the role of SBRT in the context of unfavorable localized PCa. In this non-inferiority, phase III multicenter trial 1200 patients with either intermediate or high risk PCa were enrolled. The aim of the study was to demonstrate that SBRT (42.7 Gy in 7 fractions, 3 days per week, for 2.5 weeks) is non-inferior to conventional fractionation (78 Gy in 39 fractions, 5 days per week for 8 weeks) regarding failure-free survival, without significant differences in late normal tissues complications. Failure-free survival at 5 years was 84% in both treatment arms; adjusted HR was 1.002, hence ultra-hypofractionation was found to be non-inferior to conventional fractionated RT (given HR limit = 1.338). These results paved the way for the use of SBRT even in patients with unfavorable PCa. One controversial issue is the role of ADT in the setting of SBRT for localized PCa: in conventionally fractionated schedules, short term (4-6 months) and long term (1.5-3 years) ADT are considered the standard of care for unfavorable intermediate and high-risk PCa, respectively. However, in a systematic review/meta-analysis no benefit was found for ADT added to SBRT and similar results were reported also by King et al. in a retrospective study on over 1000 patients. The PACE C trial is one of three cohort of PACE that is multicenter, international phase 3 randomized controlled study. PACE C is set to explore the efficacy of SBRT in combination with ADT for patients with unfavorable intermediate and high-risk PCa and will recruit 1182 patients who will be randomized to receive either hypofractionated RT (60 Gy in 20 fractions) or SBRT delivered with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions.

In this scenario, our study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT (40 Gy in 5 fractions every other day) coupled with ADT (relugolix 18-24 monthsaccording to clinical care) in patients with localized high-risk PCa.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

49

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergamo, Italy, 24125
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Humanitas Gavazzeni
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elisa Villa, MD, radiation oncologist
      • Milan, Italy, 20159
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Humanitas PIO X
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ciro Franzese, MD, radiation oncologist
    • Milan
      • Rozzano, Milan, Italy, 20089
        • Recruiting
        • Irccs Humanitas Research Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Raffaella Lucchini, MD, radiation oncologist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients affected by localized high-risk prostate cancer candidate to radical radiotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2
  • Histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma
  • High-risk group classification according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), defined by the presence of any one of the following high-risk factors: cT3-cT4 OR Grade Group 4 or Grade Group 5 OR PSA >20 ng/mL
  • No pelvic nodal and distant metastases at staging with PSMA-PET
  • IPSS ≤ 15 (alpha blockers allowed)
  • Life expectancy of > 5 years
  • Prostate volume ≤ 100 cc

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous local radiation treatment of the prostate
  • Previous radiotherapy to the pelvis
  • Active Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease
  • Previous tumors unless disease free for a minimum of 5 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
high risk prostate cancer patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of treatment efficacy: Biochemical-relapse free survival at 2 years (defined as rising PSA > 2 ng/mL above post-SBRT nadir).
Time Frame: from baseline to two years
from baseline to two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biochemical-relapse free survival at 5 years (defined as rising PSA > 2 ng/mL above post-SBRT nadir)
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
from baseline to 5 years
Distant-metastases free survival at 2 years and 5 years
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
from baseline to 5 years
Cancer-specific survival at 2 and 5 years
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
from baseline to 5 years
Percentage analysis of ctDNA
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years

analysis of ctdna blood values at various timepoints to assess its concentration and evaluate the possible correlation with cancer and treatment. In particular calculation of the percentage of ctDNA over total cfDNA (Tumor Fraction percentage, TF%) at different timepoints.

Evaluation of TF% variation in correlation with clinical parameters (e.g., disease progression) defined on the bases of the current clinical practice.

from baseline to 5 years
The role of ctDNA clearance as a biomarker to intercept the molecular relapse
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
we want to assess ctdna clearance to see its possible correlation with a possible molecolar relapse, no unit of measure
from baseline to 5 years
EORTC QLQ-C30 for quality of life
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
Questionnaire used to evaluate the general quality of life of patients, no score will be assessted
from baseline to 5 years
EORTC PR-25 questionnaires for the GU, GI and sexual domains at baseline and follow-up visits
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
Questionnarie to assess the presence of possible side effects in the gastrointestinal tract, the questionnaire has no score.
from baseline to 5 years
International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
questionnaire used to evaluate the symptoms of prostatic hypertrophy. Minimum value = 0 (no symptoms), maximum value = 35 (severe symptomatology)
from baseline to 5 years
Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-SF)
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
questionnaire to evaluate urinary incontinence, minimum value = 0 (no urinary incontinence), maximum value = 19 (severe urinary incontinence)
from baseline to 5 years
International Index of Erectile Function 15 Item
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
questionnarie to evaluate the erectile function. Minimum value = 0 (severe erectile disfunction), maximum value = 25 (normal sexual activity)
from baseline to 5 years
Serum PSA (ng/ml) at follow-up visits
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
from baseline to 5 years
Testosterone (ng/ml) levels at follow-up visits
Time Frame: from baseline to 5 years
from baseline to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PROSTAR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High Risk Prostate Cancer

Search Similar Trials