Imaging-Guided Classification for Endophytic Renal Tumors: PN Strategies & Outcomes
A Novel Imaging-Guided Classification System for Completely Endophytic Renal Tumors: Strategies for Optimal Partial Nephrectomy and Clinical Outcome Comparison
Study Title:
Imaging-Guided Classification & Surgical Outcomes in Endophytic Renal Tumors
Study Goal:
This observational study investigates whether an imaging-guided classification system improves partial nephrectomy (PN) outcomes for completely endophytic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Main Question:
Does preoperative imaging classification reduce complications (e.g., ischemia time, urinary leakage) in PN for endophytic RCC compared to traditional methods?
Methods:
Patients undergoing PN for endophytic RCC will be grouped based on preoperative imaging classification. Surgical outcomes (complications, renal function) will be tracked for 5 years and compared to non-classified PN cases.
Significance:
Aims to optimize PN planning, minimize risks, and improve long-term renal preservation in complex RCC cases
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
I. Background of the study Completely endogenous renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is challenging to perform partial nephrectomy (PN) due to the extensive contact area between normal renal parenchyma and RCC and the inability to accurately determine its location from the renal surface.Considering the anatomical complexity and the high risk of complications associated with PN, urologists had favored radical nephrectomy (RN) for completely endophytic RCC to mitigate complications .Advances in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery and the use of intraoperative ultrasound have led some clinicians to report prognostic and perioperative outcomes similar to those of RN treatment using PN for these complex endogenous RCCs .Although these studies suggest that PN is an available treatment option for fully endogenous RCC, PN treatment of fully endogenous RCC is usually associated with higher intraoperative and perioperative complications, including longer thermal ischemia time (WIT), higher rates of urinary leakage, and higher rates of positive surgical margins, when compared with PN treatment of non-endogenous RCC .Therefore, performing accurate preoperative planning is essential to help clinicians perform PN for fully endogenous RCC and to minimize associated complications.
In surgery with preservation of renal units, precise preoperative assessment and personalized surgical strategies are crucial for the preservation of postoperative renal function, reduction of complications, and improvement of long-term survival of patients .Therefore, the development of an imaging-based classification system to optimize surgical techniques for completely endophytic tumors is of great clinical importance.
The core objective of this study was to establish a scientific classification system for completely endophytic renal tumors through an imaging-guided preoperative classification method, to explore individualized surgical strategies for preserving renal units, and to analyze their performance in terms of postoperative clinical outcomes to provide new ideas and guidance for clinical practice .
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tianjin
-
Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300211
- The Second Hospital Of Tianjin Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who completed partial resection of completely endogenous renal cancer from January 2018 to November 2024 at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University;
- Older than 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients without clinicopathologic, functional or prognosis data;
- Patients with unilateral multiple renal tumors , solitary kidney , or comorbid severe medical conditions;
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Type1
The tumor is entirely confined within the renal parenchyma, positioned transversely between the ventral and dorsal aspects of the kidney and sagittally within the relatively avascular zone between the upper and lower polar lines, without invading renal pelvis structures.
|
|
Type2
The tumor is located on the ventral aspect of the kidney, adjacent to the anterior wall of the calyx, without involvement of the collecting system .
IIb: The tumor is situated on the dorsal aspect of the renal pelvis, closely adjacent to the posterior calyceal wall, without invading the collecting system
|
|
Type3
The tumor occupies the renal hilum region, involves the renal lip or renal sinus, and is closely associated with renal arteries, veins, and the collecting system.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical technique
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Surgical options for completely endogenous renal cancer include laparoscopic, open, and robotic.
The impact on the patient is assessed according to the different surgical modalities.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Trifecta achievement
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
In renal cancer surgery (particularly partial nephrectomy), the Trifecta achievement consists of:
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Tumour subtype on histology
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
The tumor subtypes of renal cancer studied in this study included clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, and smoky cell carcinoma.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
tumor size
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
It was used to assess the size of the tumor, and in this study, due to the endogenous nature of the tumor, the tumors were generally small, less than 5 cm
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Smoking history
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
"0" means current or former smoker, '1' means no smoking.
Used to assess whether or not one has smoked.
To observe the effect on disease
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Alcohol use
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
"0" indicates current or previous alcohol consumption and '1' indicates no alcohol consumption.
Used to assess whether or not one has been drinking.
To observe the effect on disease.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Hypertension
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
"0" means having or currently having high blood pressure and '1' means not having high blood pressure.
It is used to assess whether or not a person has ever had a hypertensive disorder.To observe the effect on disease
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Diabetes
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
"0" means current or previous diabetes, '1' means no diabetes.
Used to assess for a history of diabetes.
To observe the effect on disease
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
age
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Patient's age at diagnosis
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Gender
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Sex of the patient, categorized as male, female.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Tumor side
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Split into left and right side.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
BMI
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Body Mass Index.The formula is: BMI = weight ÷ height squared (weight in kilograms; height in meters)
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
ECOG performance status
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
0 Fully normal mobility, with no difference in mobility from that before the onset of the disease.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Charlson comorbidity index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
Score 0: Low risk. The patient has no specific co-morbidities included in the CCI score, indicating that the patient is relatively healthy and has a high survival rate. Score 1-2: Moderate risk. Patients may have one or two milder co-morbidities, but overall risk is relatively low. Score 3-4: Moderate to high risk. Patients may have a moderate burden of co-morbidities and may have reduced survival. Score 5-6: High risk. Patients have a high burden of co-morbidities and may require closer monitoring and care. Score 7 and above: Very high risk. The patient has a more severe burden of co-morbidities and may have significantly reduced survival and a higher risk of treatment. |
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
ASA score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
P.A.D.U.A. score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
The scores are 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, ranging from "none" to "very serious", respectively.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
R.E.N.A.L. score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
The R.E.N.A.L. scoring system is based on the anatomical features of renal tumors, including tumor size (R), convexity (E), relationship to the renal sinus and collecting system (N), ventral or dorsal renal location (A), location along the longitudinal axis of the kidney (L), and relationship to the renal hilum (h), and quantitatively evaluates each aspect based on the scores. Higher scores mean worse. |
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
operative time
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
The time it takes the doctor to make the cut and the time it takes to close the incision.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
estimated blood loss
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
By intraoperative blood loss, we actually mean loss of circulating blood volume
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
warm ischemia time
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
The length of time between blocking the blood supply to the kidneys, the state of persistent ischemia at room temperature, and the restoration of the blood supply.
|
From enrollment to the end of 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Postoperative length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of 8 weeks of treatment
|
Length of hospitalization of patients after surgery
|
From enrollment to the end of 8 weeks of treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY2025K002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Renal Tumors
-
NCT02061605WithdrawnBenign Renal Tumors | Malignant Renal Tumors
-
NCT06916910Active, not recruitingPartial Nephrectomy | Renal Hilum Tumors | Urinary Leakage
-
NCT01471002Completed
-
NCT01331941CompletedRenal Impairment | Advanced Solid Tumors | Kidney Disease
-
NCT01275612WithdrawnAcute Kidney Injury | Solid Tumors
-
NCT04072224Completed
-
NCT02685553CompletedClear Cell Renal Carcinoma | Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors | Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas
-
NCT02335827Completed
-
NCT01833728Completed
-
NCT02862288CompletedRenal Tumor | Bone Tumor | Lung Tumor