Implant for Walking After Incomplete SCI
Enhancing Walking and Independence After Incomplete SCI With a Fully Implanted Neuroprosthesis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Maura Malenchek, PTA
- Phone Number: 64989 216-791-3800
- Email: maura.malenchek@va.gov
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lisa Lombardo, MPT
- Phone Number: 64909 216-791-3800
- Email: lisa.lombardo2@va.gov
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- Recruiting
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Maura Malenchek, PTA
- Phone Number: 64989 216-791-3800
- Email: maura.malenchek@va.gov
-
Principal Investigator:
- Nathan Makowski, PhD
-
Contact:
- Lisa Lombardo, MPT
- Phone Number: 64909 216-791-3800
- Email: lisalombardo2@va.gov
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between the ages of 18-75
- Non-ventilator dependent paralysis resulting from injuries such as: cervical/thoracic spinal cord injuries affecting the trunk and/or lower limbs
- Impairment classification of AIS B, C, or D (preservation of sensation and/or some motor function) with weakness in trunk and/or lower extremity muscles
- Unable to walk faster than 0.8m/s during a 10m walk test
- Gait deviation such as reduced peak hip, knee, and/or ankle range of motion during stance or swing phases due to motor impairment
- Time post injury greater than six months
- Innervated and excitable lower extremity and trunk musculature
- Adequate social support and stability
- Willingness to comply with follow-up procedures
- Appropriate body habitus (height and weight within acceptable limits as determined by study physician)
- Neurologically stable as determined by a physician
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant fracture risk or history of spontaneous fractures
- History of heterotopic ossification at the hip, knee, or ankle
- Non-English speaking
- Insufficient upper extremity function to use an assistive device (e.g. walker or cane)
- Females who are pregnant
- Current pressure injury that would be exacerbated by study activities
- Uncontrolled spasticity that would interfere with study activities
- Significant range of motion limitations that would compromise study activities
- History of vestibular dysfunction, balance problems, or spontaneous falls
- Disorder or condition that require MRI monitoring
- Acute and/or untreated orthopedic issues that would prevent weight bearing or exercising implanted muscles such as a dislocation or fracture
- Acute and/or chronic medical problems left untreated or not controlled that would increase risk by using stimulation such as cardiac abnormalities, immunological/pulmonary/renal/circulatory compromise
- Uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension
- Presence of a demand pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, or neuroprosthesis system with components in the legs
- Any other medical or psychological condition that would be a contraindication
Implant eligibility criteria
• In addition to all of the above, the participant must be able to fully support their body weight in standing with an assistive device prior to implantation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Implantation, controller development and evaluation
This phase includes installing the device and setting the individual up for use of the system and evaluating the effect of the system on walking ability.
|
Networked NeuroProsthesis - Lower Extremity Configuration (NNP-LE) measuring physiologic command signals and delivering neural stimulation to intramuscular and nerve cuff electrodes for trunk and leg muscle assistance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in maximum walking distance
Time Frame: Immediately after the participant is fully trained to use their implanted system
|
The maximum walking distance is a measure of how far the participant can walk within a single bout over an unconstrained period of time.
The measure is used to assess whether endurance and walking capacity improve.
The difference between walking with and without the system turned on determines if the system improves walking capacity.
Users serve as their own concurrent controls.
|
Immediately after the participant is fully trained to use their implanted system
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in spinal cord injury - functional ambulation inventory (SCI-FAI)
Time Frame: Immediately after the participant is fully trained to use their implanted system
|
The SCI-FAI is an observational gait assessment that assesses three areas of walking: gait parameters, assistive device use, and walking mobility.
The difference between walking with and without the system turned on determines if the system improves walking ability.
Users serve as their own concurrent controls with and without device assistance.
|
Immediately after the participant is fully trained to use their implanted system
|
|
Difference in Home and community mobility
Time Frame: Baseline and Immediately after the participant is fully trained to use their implanted system
|
A body worn step counter measures the number of steps taken daily over the course of about a month prior to implantation and then after implantation and system use.
The difference between walking before and after having the system identifies if people walk more once they have the system.
Users serve as their own longitudinal controls.
|
Baseline and Immediately after the participant is fully trained to use their implanted system
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nathan Makowski, PhD, MetroHealth System, Ohio
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1802378
- CDMRP-SC230198 (Other Grant/Funding Number: DoD CDMRP)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.