Gastric Emptying in Healthy Volunteers and GLP-1 Agonist Users (aGLP1-GUS)

May 22, 2025 updated by: Javiera Vargas, Clinica Alemana de Santiago

Gastric Emptying Assessed by Gastric Ultrasound (US) in Healthy Volunteers and Semaglutide Users: Cohort Study

This observational study aims to determine the gastric emptying kinetics assessed by ultrasound in healthy volunteers after a standard breakfast and the state of the stomach after a clear liquid diet for 18 /24 hours in patients on GLP-1 agonist. The main questions it seeks to answer are:

  • Is the kinetic after a standard breakfast that includes ( avocado and eggs: high fat) as fast as a standard meal that does not involve this food?
  • Is a clear liquid diet of 18 to 24 hours enough to be an empty-stomach, assessed by Ultrasound in patients on GLP1 agonist?

Participants will be asked to do:

-A baseline Gastric US will be performed for healthy volunteers, and then they will have a standardized breakfast. An hourly or bihourly assessment will be done by the US.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

GLP-1 analogues enhance insulin secretion from β-cells, reduce glucagon secretion, have an appetite-suppressing effect, and delay gastric emptying. This last effect may make standard preoperative fasting inadequate, compromising airway safety during elective surgery and increasing aspiration risk.

The main goal is to gather evidence to determine the optimal fasting period and dietary regimen to ensure safe outpatient surgery without increasing the risk of aspiration.Ultrasound gastric content assessment is a highly accessible, bedside, cost-free, and low-risk tool for anesthesiologists. The increased use of these drugs in surgical patients and the lack of international consensus on their discontinuation and fasting protocols before surgery necessitate further study. Our hypothesis is that GLP-1 analogue users (for weight loss or diabetes) have significantly slower gastric emptying, but a 24-hour liquid regimen may be sufficient to ensure an empty stomach and safe elective surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
155

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy volunteers will be assessed for emptying the stomach after a standardized high-fat meal, by ultrasound.

Cohort of patients on a GLP-1 agonist after 18/24 hours of clear fluids.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old or older
  • Healthy volunteers or semaglutide users

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Hiatal hernia
  • Impairment to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Healthy volunteers after high fat standardized breakfast
GUS will be made
Diagnostic test: Gastric Ultrasound
A gastric ultrasound will be performed to determine the state of the stomach. Empty, clear fluids, solid, and in case of fluid, the amount of it ( using free tracing)
Other Names:
  • GUS
Patients on GLP-1 agonist
Patients on GLP-1 agonist after clear fluids diet of 18/24 hrs. GUS will be made.
Diagnostic test: Gastric Ultrasound
A gastric ultrasound will be performed to determine the state of the stomach. Empty, clear fluids, solid, and in case of fluid, the amount of it ( using free tracing)
Other Names:
  • GUS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with each Grade ( stomach content characteristics) according Perlas et al
Time Frame: 24 hours tops since the starting of the clear fluid diet
Grade 0 ( empty in supine and RLD), Grade 1 ( empty supine but liquid content on RDL), Grade 3 ( Solid content or fluid with an area of more than or equal to 10 cm2).
24 hours tops since the starting of the clear fluid diet

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area of the stomach in supine and in RLD assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame: 24 hours tops since the starting of the clear fluid diet
Grade 0 ( empty in supine and RLD), Grade 1 ( empty supine but liquid content on RDL), Grade 3 ( Solid content or fluid with an area of more than or equal to 10 cm2).
24 hours tops since the starting of the clear fluid diet

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Clinica Alemana de Santiago

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Cristian Arzola, MD, MSc, Universidad de Toronto
  • Study Director: Juan Pablo Ghiringelli, Universidad de Valparaiso
  • Study Director: Miguel vega, MD, Universidad del Desarrollo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ID1406
  • 2024-100 (Comité Etico Cientifico Facultad de Medicina Universidad del Desarrollo Clínica Alemana)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings