Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue

June 18, 2025 updated by: İbrahim Yalçın, Dokuz Eylul University

Comparison of Two-Point and Four-Point Cervical Injection Techniques Using Methylene Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer

This clinical trial evaluates lymph node mapping in newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery. The standard technique uses a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection. The study aims to determine if increasing injection points improves mapping success.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In recent years, Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) mapping has become a key focus in improving surgical outcomes for endometrial cancer. While methylene blue is a cost-effective option for SLN mapping, its detection rates remain suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate whether increasing the injection points from the standard 2-point to a 4-point methylene blue injection improves SLN mapping success.

This randomized controlled trial will include patients with preoperative stage I endometrial carcinoma. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection, and the other group will receive a 4-point injection.

The primary endpoint is the difference in SLN detection rates between the two techniques. Findings from this study will provide detailed insights into whether the 4-point injection offers a significant advantage over the standard 2-point method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06230
        • Recruiting
        • Ankara University
        • Contact:
          • Salih Taskin, MD
          • Phone Number: +905064383629
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Salih Taskin, MD
      • İzmir, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Dokuz Eylul University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ali Hakan Kula, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer based on CT and PET-CT imaging.
  • Individuals with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical Conditions

  • Individuals diagnosed with dementia.
  • Individuals with allergies to methylene blue or iodine.
  • Individuals who have received active treatment for another malignancy within the past five years.
  • Inability to successfully perform PLD (pelvic lymphadenectomy) or history of prior PLD.
  • Women with multiple and confluent lymph nodes identified as positive on FDG-PET/CT (such cases are not considered stage I).

Cancer-Related Conditions

  • Individuals with clinically or radiologically identified positive lymph nodes or metastatic disease.
  • Individuals with a history of pelvic dissection and/or radiation therapy.
  • Individuals with advanced cervical or uterine cancer.
  • Individuals with T3/T4 lesions.
  • Individuals with cervical tumors larger than 2 cm.

Organ Dysfunction

• Individuals with hepatic dysfunction and a MELD score ≥ 10 and creatinine ≥ 2·0 mg/dl patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 2- Point Methylene Blue Injection

In the 2-point injection arm, participants will receive the standard sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping technique using methylene blue. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into two specific locations on the cervix:

At the 3 o'clock position At the 9 o'clock position
Procedure: Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection
Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) detection using cervical methylene blue injection is a surgical technique designed to identify the primary lymph nodes responsible for draining the uterus in patients with endometrial cancer. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into specific locations within the cervical stroma to enable lymphatic uptake. The dye subsequently travels through the lymphatic channels, allowing for intraoperative visual identification of the sentinel nodes. This targeted approach facilitates selective SLN excision for pathological evaluation, providing critical information about lymphatic involvement while minimizing the extent of surgical dissection. The effectiveness of SLN mapping is contingent upon the accuracy of the injection technique and the anatomical distribution of lymphatic drainage.
Active Comparator: 4- Point Methylene Blue Injection

In the 4-point injection arm, participants will receive the standard sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping technique using methylene blue. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into two specific locations on the cervix:

At the 2 o'clock position At the 4 o'clock position At the 8 o'clock position At the 10 o'clock position
Procedure: Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection
Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) detection using cervical methylene blue injection is a surgical technique designed to identify the primary lymph nodes responsible for draining the uterus in patients with endometrial cancer. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into specific locations within the cervical stroma to enable lymphatic uptake. The dye subsequently travels through the lymphatic channels, allowing for intraoperative visual identification of the sentinel nodes. This targeted approach facilitates selective SLN excision for pathological evaluation, providing critical information about lymphatic involvement while minimizing the extent of surgical dissection. The effectiveness of SLN mapping is contingent upon the accuracy of the injection technique and the anatomical distribution of lymphatic drainage.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Detection Rate
Time Frame: 1 day
The detection rate will be measured as the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified using methylene blue divided by the total number of lymph nodes excised during surgery. Comparison will be made between the two-point and four-point cervical injection techniques. (Unit of Measure: Proportion (%))
1 day
Sensitivity of SLN Biopsy for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases
Time Frame: 1 day

Sensitivity will be calculated as the proportion of true positive SLNs (confirmed by histopathology) over the total number of lymph nodes with metastases.

(Unit of Measure: Percentage (%))
1 day
Specificity of SLN Biopsy for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases
Time Frame: 1 day

Description: Specificity will be calculated as the proportion of true negative SLNs over all lymph nodes without metastasis.

(Unit of Measure: Percentage (%))
1 day
Rate of Positive SLNs Detected
Time Frame: 1 day
Proportion of SLNs identified as positive for metastasis in each injection technique group. (Unit of Measure: Proportion (%))
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure Duration
Time Frame: 1 day
Total time in minutes from injection to identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), recorded and compared between two-point and four-point cervical injection techniques. (Unit of Measure: Minutes)
1 day
Complications and Side Effects - Injection-Related Side Effects
Time Frame: 1 month
Incidence of side effects related to methylene blue injection (e.g., allergic reaction, local pain, or discoloration at the injection site), recorded during and after the procedure. (Unit of Measure: Number of events and proportion (%))
1 month
SLN Anatomical Distribution
Time Frame: 1 day
Number and proportion of detected SLNs located in specific anatomical regions (e.g., pelvic, para-aortic) for each injection technique. (Unit of Measure: Number and Proportion (%))
1 day
Surgical Complications
Time Frame: 1 month
Incidence of postoperative complications related to SLN mapping, including infection, hematoma, and lymphedema. (Unit of Measure: Number of events and proportion (%))
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dokuz Eylul University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 693-SBKAEK

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD related to the primary and secondary outcomes will be shared upon reasonable request. Access will be granted for academic and scientific research purposes, subject to approval by the study investigators and compliance with ethical and regulatory guidelines. A data-sharing agreement will be required to ensure proper use and confidentiality of the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings