Radiofrequency vs. Ultrasound Therapy for Shoulder Joint in Stroke Patients: A Comparative Clinical Trial (TECAR)
Comparison Between Radiofrequency and Ultrasound on Shoulder Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Stroke
The purpose of the current study is to:
Compare between radiofrequency (TECAR) therapy and ultrasound on Shoulder Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Outcome in Patients with stroke.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rewan M Aloush
- Phone Number: +201024232512
- Email: rewan.aloush@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Muhammed E Abulftouh
- Phone Number: +201023292028
- Email: ftoh1996@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Gamasa, Egypt
- Faculty of Physical Therapy Delta University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fourty-five hemiplegic patients with shoulder pain post- stroke from both sexes will participate in this study.
- The patients will be older than 18 years old (30-60 years old)
- The presence of sub-acute shoulder pain (more than 3 months).
- Sub-acute stroke survivors (3 months post-stroke).
- score of 1|1+ points on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) on shoulder joint.
- Stage 2 or above according to Brunnstrom function assessment of shoulder joint
- All conducted patients experienced a single stroke during the last 3 months with cognitive capacity that will enable them to comprehend and follow the instructions (Mini-Mental Scale score > 24).
Exclusion Criteria:
The following patients will be excluded from the study patients with:
- Bilateral adhesive capsulitis
- Systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, malignancies, heart diseases, infections, coagulation disorders, full rotator cuff tears
- A history of recent shoulder surgery, neurological problems involving the upper extremity, shoulder joint osteoarthritis
- Upper extremity fractures, cervical radiculopathy
- Impaired sensation, having a heart pacemaker, pregnancy
- Injuries in the upper limbs
- Other neurological diseases or cancer
- Osteosynthesis material or pacemaker
- Botulinum toxin or antispastic treatment 3 months prior to studying.
- Any contraindication to massage and Tecar as skin infections, inflammatory vascular diseases, or acute inflammation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group (GI)= 15 will be treated by Radiofrequency TECAR Therapy
Group (GI) will be treated by Radiofrequency TECAR Therapy on shoulder joint as well as Designed Physical Therapy Program
|
Radiofrequency (TECAR) therapy is a non-invasive, non-ablative treatment that uses electromagnetic energy to generate endogenous heat, promoting increased blood flow and tissue healing in both superficial and deep tissues.
With a long wavelength and low frequency (300 KHz to 1 MHz), it can penetrate deeply into muscles, tendons, and bones, making it suitable even in acute conditions.
TECAR operates in two modes: capacitive (targeting soft tissues rich in electrolytes) and resistive (targeting high-resistance tissues like bones and tendons).
The therapy stimulates natural repair processes by inducing ion flow and micro-hyperemia, leading to the release of endorphins and cortisone, which help reduce pain, inflammation, and edema, while enhancing immune response and tissue regeneration.
|
|
Experimental: Group (GII)= 15 will be treated by Ultrasound Therapy
Group (GII) will be treated by Ultrasound Therapy on shoulder joint as well as Designed Physical Therapy Program
|
The ultrasound waves accelerate healing, increasing local vascularity and improving several other characteristics, including energy absorption capacity and maximum rupture resistance tension, increased collagen synthesis, fibroblast proliferation, release of growth factors stimulated by mast cell degranulation and improved response of platelets and macrophages anticipating the proliferative and remodeling phase.
1-MHz continuous ultrasound, with a half-value depth of approximately 2.3 cm, is frequently used to treat deep tissues that are approximately 2.3 to 5 cm deep.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group (GIII)= 15 will be treated by Designed Physical Therapy Program,
Group (GIII) will be treated by Designed Physical Therapy Program, all outcomes' measures will be assessed pre and post treatment.
|
The designed physical therapy program focuses on improving upper limb mobility and stability through a structured set of exercises targeting the shoulder joint.
It includes prolonged stretching performed in a seated position to extend the thumb, fingers, wrist, elbow, and shoulder, along with scapular mobilization in side-lying and stretching of internal rotators in a supine position.
The stretching progression begins with external rotation at 45° abduction and advances to 90° abduction and full reach toward the ground if pain-free.
Joint stabilization exercises involve resistance band movements in various shoulder and elbow positions, including controlled abduction, flexion, scapular movements, and external rotation, all aimed at enhancing joint control and muscular coordination.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Digital Goniometer for shoulder range of motion
Time Frame: 4 Weeks
|
The digital goniometer (Baseline 12-1027 USA) will be used to assess range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint. The device consists of fixed arm, movable arm and screen. The device converts the angular displacement of the joint (represented in the degree of change of the angle between the two arms of the device) into an electric signal readout which is produced in a simple digital form. The device is the most accurate and objective method of ROM measurement with excellent inter-rater and intra-rater ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 |
4 Weeks
|
|
The pressure algometer
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The pressure algometer, specifically the hand-held Baseline® model, is a reliable and valid tool used to objectively measure pressure pain thresholds (PPT).
It features a pistol-style grip and a pressure-sensitive gauge with a 0.785 cm² rubber tip.
The device applies gradual, consistent manual force to determine the minimal pressure at which a sensation of pressure turns into pain.
This method is widely used in clinical settings due to its strong correlation with pain intensity and excellent inter-rater reliability, making it a dependable tool for assessing pain sensitivity.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS):
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): For pain Threshold will be assessed by Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11-point (0-10) Scale will be used to measure pain. Patients verbally will select value between (0-10) based on intensity of pain. (0) means No pain and (10) means maximum pain experienced at baseline |
4 weeks
|
|
Functional Outcome and disability / Shoulder pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a 13-item questionnaire used to assess the intensity of shoulder pain and the degree of functional disability.
It includes two subscales: five questions evaluating pain severity and eight questions assessing difficulty with daily activities involving upper limb use.
Patients mark their responses on a 10 cm visual analogue scale, with scores ranging up to 50 for pain, 80 for disability, and a total of 130, all expressed as percentages.
SPADI has demonstrated strong validity and reliability, including in its Arabic version, with an intra-rater reliability coefficient of 0.89, making it a dependable tool for clinical and research use.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Joint Diseases
- Arthralgia
- Paralysis
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Stroke
- Shoulder Pain
- Hemiplegia
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Ultrasonography
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RADIOFREQUENCY AND ULTRASOUND
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.